Netanyahu on Iraq conflict, Sept 12 2002

Inversionism Photo

Inversionism
8 months 20 Views
Category:
Description:
You need to listen to this testimony from Netanyahu on the house floor in regards to the conflict in Iraq on Sept 12 2002. He said the quiet parts out loud that are HIGHLY relevant to what is going on today, and how none of what's happening is truly about peace, diplomacy, justice, or anything else they are purporting on the media right now. It's just imperialism and war with subversive unspoken motivations for world domination and an eventual new world order.
I want to remind everyone that at this time, he was not the PM of Israel, but that sure didn't stop him from warmongering to the US establishment and having discussions with the CIA on how they should proceed with invading Iraq for the "war on terror", which they eventually initiated 6 months later on a lie of weapons of mass destruction.
The war in Iraq started March 20th 2003, and went on for nearly 9 years, severely destabilizing the middle east, putting the US in immense amounts of debt, and creating terrorists that hated America and subsequently Israel because we invaded their damn country, completely destroyed their economies, and killed 1 million of their people, including women and children.
No one likes to talk about that though and how the US and it's western allies have continually been committing war crimes for decades with CIA orchestrated coups because that's perceived as being anti-American and a "terrorist sympathizer", or at least it was during the war. People are now doing the same with the conflict in Israel and Palestine.
I'm a people/civilian sympathizer. I sympathize with innocent people who are just like you and me, trying to survive and live their life, make an honest living, and be left alone. I don't sympathize with the corrupt governments, military industrial complex, corporate interests, and obscenely wealthy bankers on either side that are propagandizing and subjugating their people into wars over ideologies, resources, or perhaps something far more sinister.
So with that said, this clip of Netanyahu should give you important insight into how the war propagandists think and what their real intent is. It's not peace, it's not diplomacy, it's just war and destruction in pursuit of a New World Order in trying to topple every government in the middle east back to back, with CIA orchestrated coups and manufactured wars to eventually give them "democracy", which in reality is just a puppet president controlled by globalist interests and central bank controlled by the international cult of bankers.
Smedley D. Butler, War is a Racket
“I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.”
---------------------------------------------
Important Parts from Netanyahu Address: 
Mr. Netanyahu ->
Yes. Now the question you have is this: This is now a question of not of values. Obviously, we would like to see a regime change, at least I would like to, in Iran, just as I would like to see in Iraq. The question now is a practical question. What is the best place to proceed? It is not a question of whether Iraq's regime should be taken out, but when should it be taken out. It is not a question of whether you would like to see a regime change in Iran, but how to achieve it.
Iran has something that Iraq does not have. Iran has, for example, 250,000 satellite dishes. It has Internet use. I once said to the heads of the CIA when I was Prime Minister that if you want to advance regime change in Iran, you do not have to go through the CIA cloak-and-dagger stuff. What you want to do is take very large, very strong transponders and just beam Melrose Place and Beverly Hills 90210 into Teheran and Iran. That is subversive stuff. The young kids watch it, the young people. They want to have the same nice clothes and houses and swimming pools and so on. That is something that is available, and internal forces of dissention that are available in Iran--which is paradoxically probably the most open society in that part of the world. It is a lot more open than Iraq, which is probably the most closed society, and therefore you have no ability to foment this kind of dynamic inside Iraq.
So the question now is choose. You can beam Melrose Place, but it may take a long time. On the other hand, if you take out Saddam's regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region. And I think that people sitting right next door in Iran, young people and many others will say the time of such regimes of such despots is gone. There is a new age.
NEW. WORLD. ORDER. 
Now go read Project for a New American Century and understand that all the war in the middle east was premeditated in coordination with Israeli interests, and is why 9/11 was allowed by the US government to happen in the first place. 
Problem, reaction, solution.