1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:10,280 Investigative reporting is being sort of squeezed out of the picture and I think intentionally 2 00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:11,800 because it tends to ruffle feathers. 3 00:00:11,800 --> 00:00:17,360 I mean, it's good investigative reporting does ruffle feathers and it draws lawsuits and 4 00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:18,880 it gets newspapers and trouble. 5 00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:35,320 My name's Gary Webb. 6 00:00:35,320 --> 00:00:36,920 I am an investigative journalist. 7 00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:42,400 I've been an investigative journalist for about 25 years for daily newspapers and in 8 00:00:42,400 --> 00:00:48,360 1996 I wrote a series of stories entitled Dark Alliance which is about CIA involvement 9 00:00:48,360 --> 00:00:56,880 in drug trafficking. 10 00:00:56,880 --> 00:01:02,160 What my story showed was that the cocaine that was being sold in those neighborhoods 11 00:01:02,160 --> 00:01:07,800 was coming from mainly one source and this one source was being used to finance a gorilla 12 00:01:07,800 --> 00:01:16,160 war in Central America. 13 00:01:16,160 --> 00:01:22,240 The general idea of the CIA dealing drugs was something that the American mainstream 14 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:28,420 press had never written about before and that's why it prompted outrage among blacks, 15 00:01:28,420 --> 00:01:36,360 among drug reform activists, among politicians, by the CIA, by every federal agency involved 16 00:01:36,360 --> 00:01:39,480 in the drug war because it showed they were doing their jobs. 17 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:40,280 There was a fraud. 18 00:01:47,120 --> 00:01:53,680 Right after we published the stories, the support we got from the media was very favorable. 19 00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:57,160 Newsweek magazine did a big piece in the story and said it was well documented and what 20 00:01:57,160 --> 00:01:58,160 researched. 21 00:01:58,160 --> 00:02:02,080 The website was getting like a million hits a day. 22 00:02:02,080 --> 00:02:05,680 There were marches and walks, there were marches and coffin and they were candlelight 23 00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:07,480 visuals. 24 00:02:07,480 --> 00:02:12,840 Every California senator, the NANDID and official investigation. 25 00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:18,720 So the story itself was really building momentum. 26 00:02:18,720 --> 00:02:24,760 The government reaction was no reaction and this I believe was a very careful strategy 27 00:02:24,760 --> 00:02:29,200 because nobody was going to believe the government if they came out and said we didn't 28 00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:30,200 do it. 29 00:02:30,200 --> 00:02:34,080 The proof was fairly overwhelming since we had all these government documents showing 30 00:02:34,080 --> 00:02:36,200 that it had happened. 31 00:02:36,200 --> 00:02:45,080 So what happened was they let the so-called liberal press speak for them and they had 32 00:02:45,080 --> 00:02:49,680 the National Security Reporters at the Washington Post who coincidentally used to work 33 00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:51,680 for the CIA. 34 00:02:51,680 --> 00:02:55,040 Right story is saying it doesn't mean anything. 35 00:02:55,040 --> 00:03:09,440 It was a distraction from what the story said and it became sort of a media war between 36 00:03:09,440 --> 00:03:14,320 the Mercury News which stood behind the story at that point and the rest of these 37 00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:18,040 established with media who wanted us to back away from it. 38 00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:23,880 And part of that reason was because these major newspapers have written about this issue 39 00:03:23,880 --> 00:03:29,160 back in the 1980s but had written about it very dismissively as if this is nonsense. 40 00:03:29,160 --> 00:03:30,160 It doesn't happen. 41 00:03:30,160 --> 00:03:32,160 It never happened. 42 00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:35,920 And then 10 years later we came back with documentation showing that it was absolutely 43 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:40,880 true and that it was worse than it was. 44 00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:46,600 We had gotten the story out around them and we had gotten it out in a big way that they 45 00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:49,240 couldn't control and that was the internet. 46 00:03:49,240 --> 00:03:54,240 And I think a lot of this was directed to the Mercury News to say we don't care what 47 00:03:54,240 --> 00:03:55,240 gotten it. 48 00:03:55,240 --> 00:03:58,800 We don't care what kind of story we've got. 49 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:04,280 We set the National News agenda and if we don't like your story we will kill your story 50 00:04:04,280 --> 00:04:11,480 regardless of truth. 51 00:04:11,480 --> 00:04:16,200 The media rejoiced when this came out because it meant they had won. 52 00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:21,040 They had forced a newspaper to back away from a story that was true. 53 00:04:21,040 --> 00:04:29,160 Simply because of this barrage, of criticism, of mindless criticism essentially that really 54 00:04:29,160 --> 00:04:35,840 took its toll on the internet's vector and they were being seen as sort of outcasts from 55 00:04:35,840 --> 00:04:37,840 the club. 56 00:04:37,840 --> 00:04:42,240 And I think they made it political decision that it was better in the long run take 57 00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:52,360 a dive on this story and get back in the good races at the rest of the media. 58 00:04:52,360 --> 00:04:57,040 It was essentially a war between my editors and myself because I wouldn't apologize for 59 00:04:57,040 --> 00:05:02,080 the story or back away from the story and fought them on it publicly. 60 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:05,080 And so they transferred me to a bureau that was a hundred and forty miles from where I 61 00:05:05,080 --> 00:05:16,360 lived and I called in sick a lot. 62 00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:21,200 One of the things I'm proud of in regards to that story is the website that the Mercury 63 00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:29,720 News set up because it really was the first time that a newspaper brought its readers. 64 00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:35,840 Not only into the interior of paper but into the reporters' notebooks. 65 00:05:35,840 --> 00:05:40,520 This was a story that as I told my editors had a very high unbelievable ability factor 66 00:05:40,520 --> 00:05:41,520 built into them. 67 00:05:41,520 --> 00:05:45,160 A lot of people were going to say this can't be true. 68 00:05:45,160 --> 00:05:52,280 And this story became a sensation because of the website, not because of the story, but 69 00:05:52,280 --> 00:05:54,960 because people could get to it. 70 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:58,240 And they could never have gotten to it before because it's an American movie. 71 00:05:58,240 --> 00:06:05,000 There's a small regional newspaper in Northern California that you couldn't read if you 72 00:06:05,000 --> 00:06:08,240 lived in New York or you couldn't read if you lived in LA. 73 00:06:08,240 --> 00:06:12,800 But the story you could read anywhere in the world and see all of our documentation. 74 00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:19,680 So if you can and we did this on purpose to make it very hard to not down, to make it very difficult 75 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:21,840 for people to say this didn't happen. 76 00:06:21,840 --> 00:06:23,800 But they said it didn't happen at all. 77 00:06:28,240 --> 00:06:46,240 Old pirates, yes they are by, sold I do them a chance. 78 00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:52,960 Minutes after they took I from the bottom of the space. 79 00:06:52,960 --> 00:07:02,800 But my hat was made strong by the hand of the almighty. 80 00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:07,840 We followed in this generation. 81 00:07:07,840 --> 00:07:16,080 Try on firmly won't you help to sing? 82 00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:29,200 These songs of freedom, because all I ever had, redemption song. 83 00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:41,120 These songs of freedom, these songs of freedom. 84 00:07:41,120 --> 00:07:47,200 authentic journalism is telling people something that the government doesn't want them to know.