1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:13,640
In the course of our research into online pedophile networks, a specific URL continued to

2
00:00:13,640 --> 00:00:16,400
re-emerge within deviant chat rooms.

3
00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:22,240
A site featuring over 230 gigs of sexually suggestive material involving children, specifically

4
00:00:22,240 --> 00:00:26,800
young girls, ranging from the age of 14 to 5 years old.

5
00:00:26,800 --> 00:00:33,160
In on one occasion, a user shared a link featuring the sexual torture of an infant.

6
00:00:33,160 --> 00:00:37,760
We immediately reported the link to cybertip.org.

7
00:00:37,760 --> 00:00:43,680
This website is arguably one of the largest surface web pedophile networks in the world, with

8
00:00:43,680 --> 00:00:56,040
new images uploaded every day, and it can all be accessed through Google.

9
00:00:56,040 --> 00:00:59,840
For obvious reasons, we cannot reveal too much of the site.

10
00:00:59,840 --> 00:01:04,240
We think it's important, however, to expose its name and how it functions.

11
00:01:04,240 --> 00:01:08,760
But first, it's crucial to understand why.

12
00:01:08,760 --> 00:01:13,440
Educating ourselves about the prominence of surface web-child sexual abuse material can help

13
00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:15,360
us protect our children.

14
00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:20,960
We can also work together and collectively flag the URL on cybertip.org.

15
00:01:20,960 --> 00:01:26,000
Unfortunately, our attempts to remove the site will be difficult, because the pedophiles

16
00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:36,160
who created it have made it nearly impossible to remove.

17
00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:41,800
Its opening page features a set of rules, which, when it's here to, are considered technically

18
00:01:41,800 --> 00:01:42,800
legal.

19
00:01:42,800 --> 00:01:46,800
Rules like, do not upload or request child pornography.

20
00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:52,440
No visible genitalia is allowed, both nipples and butts in a non-commercial non-sexual

21
00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:54,560
context are okay.

22
00:01:54,560 --> 00:01:59,960
Some images do adhere to these rules, even depicting children in a decent manner.

23
00:01:59,960 --> 00:02:03,920
But the implications of this fact are just as troubling.

24
00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:08,440
Because according to this website, it appears that even wholesome images of children can

25
00:02:08,440 --> 00:02:11,040
be sexually gratifying for pedophiles.

26
00:02:11,040 --> 00:02:17,760
I kind of freaked out after discovering this, and I scoured my Facebook asking myself,

27
00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:20,720
have I posted any images of my nephew?

28
00:02:20,720 --> 00:02:24,240
How devastating would it be if I saw an innocent picture of him?

29
00:02:24,480 --> 00:02:29,760
Being shared by these perverts, knowing the only person to blame is me.

30
00:02:29,760 --> 00:02:32,120
And perhaps most unsettling.

31
00:02:32,120 --> 00:02:36,120
What exactly would I be able to do about it?

32
00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:41,440
Many users on this website share YouTube links.

33
00:02:41,440 --> 00:02:47,680
One of which led to this rather disturbing channel called Piper Bines.

34
00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:55,520
I think I know why fluffy wants to eat anything else?

35
00:02:55,520 --> 00:02:57,800
Cause he is a stinker!

36
00:02:57,800 --> 00:02:58,800
I don't!

37
00:02:58,800 --> 00:03:01,800
Oh yeah, baby!

38
00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:03,800
It's here, baby!

39
00:03:03,800 --> 00:03:25,040
The long-awaited fan, what's my work on and subscribing here?

40
00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:30,080
Other users are literally stalking the social media accounts of young girls.

41
00:03:30,080 --> 00:03:46,400
This person says she is a hottie, but nothing secret and all freely accessible.

42
00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:51,760
How are we to respond, knowing that many of these images are harmless, but are being

43
00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:58,400
used in the most harmful ways?

44
00:03:58,400 --> 00:04:01,480
How can this website be quote technically legal?

45
00:04:01,480 --> 00:04:06,080
If we know its users are sexually exploiting children on it?

46
00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:08,320
And how are we supposed to protect our children?

47
00:04:08,320 --> 00:04:12,800
While this legal grey area exists?

48
00:04:12,800 --> 00:04:18,320
These apparent guidelines merely serve as a protection mechanism for the preservation of the

49
00:04:18,320 --> 00:04:19,320
site.

50
00:04:19,320 --> 00:04:25,240
In minutes, we found images portraying naked children forcing to pose inside of cheap

51
00:04:25,240 --> 00:04:30,160
photoshoots and videos displaying actual child pornography.

52
00:04:30,160 --> 00:04:34,440
All of which was reported to cybertip.org.

53
00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:41,040
Now, everything that you've just seen is merely the contextual setup for what regrettably

54
00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:46,480
is next.

55
00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:53,520
As seen in Pitogate 2020 part 2, when typing SRC into Russia's Yandex search engine, countless

56
00:04:53,520 --> 00:04:56,520
and decent images of children pulled up.

57
00:04:56,520 --> 00:05:01,240
Almost all of which feature disturbing tags and comments.

58
00:05:01,240 --> 00:05:07,040
But if you were to type SRC into Yandex right now, literally nothing pulls up.

59
00:05:07,040 --> 00:05:08,840
This is a very good thing.

60
00:05:08,840 --> 00:05:13,440
And if our video played a role which we think it did, we're encouraged.

61
00:05:13,440 --> 00:05:19,640
What is shocking however, is that new findings point to another flaw in Yandex, one which

62
00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:25,720
might shine a light onto the name of this website and potentially bring new context

63
00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:27,560
to a controversial new film.

64
00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:30,160
It's really sparked outrage and calls for a boycott.

65
00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:34,400
Social media erupted in outrage with the hashtag, cancelled Netflix.

66
00:05:34,400 --> 00:05:39,360
I thought the movie poster was simply a film of core marketing on the behalf of Netflix.

67
00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:40,880
Boy, was I fucking wrong?

68
00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:44,480
There is literally no reason why there should be any close-ups.

69
00:05:44,480 --> 00:05:45,880
It's literally awful.

70
00:05:45,880 --> 00:05:47,640
It is beyond repulsive.

71
00:05:47,640 --> 00:05:49,440
We are currently living in clown world.

72
00:05:49,440 --> 00:05:53,440
However well-intentioned, I think it falls far short of the mark.

73
00:05:53,440 --> 00:05:58,080
After cuties was published on Netflix, a kind of social battle ensued, with one side

74
00:05:58,080 --> 00:06:05,400
praising the film for what they viewed as a fearless critique of religious traditionalisms.

75
00:06:05,400 --> 00:06:10,680
And the other instance, what they perceived as the sexual exploitation of children, a societal

76
00:06:10,680 --> 00:06:13,520
defect both sides are against.

77
00:06:13,520 --> 00:06:19,080
After watching the film myself, I see cuties as either an intentional or unintentional pedophilia

78
00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:20,680
aologist film.

79
00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:26,320
For example, in one scene, the children sneak into laser tag and are caught by security.

80
00:06:26,320 --> 00:06:28,480
Moments later, another guard arrives.

81
00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:33,760
And after the children plead to be let go, the protagonist Amy decides to twerk for the

82
00:06:33,760 --> 00:06:44,960
older man.

83
00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:49,920
The film reserves judgment toward the security guard, seemingly unbothered by his apparent

84
00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:52,000
attraction to twerking 11-year-olds.

85
00:06:52,000 --> 00:06:57,600
While simultaneously judging, rightly so, the moral pitfalls of his lomic fundamentalism.

86
00:06:57,600 --> 00:07:00,240
But aren't both worthy of critique?

87
00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:02,040
Why reprimand one?

88
00:07:02,040 --> 00:07:03,760
But give the other a pass?

89
00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:08,880
This blind spot occurs again and again, making the final scene where Amy independently

90
00:07:08,880 --> 00:07:12,960
decides to dress decently, feel unarmed, and tone deaf.

91
00:07:12,960 --> 00:07:16,560
Are we supposed to forget about the sexualized dance routines?

92
00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:20,880
Do the creators of cuties even see anything wrong with those routines?

93
00:07:20,880 --> 00:07:25,840
That I cannot confidently answer that question is to acknowledge the problem.

94
00:07:25,840 --> 00:07:30,120
And it's because of this problem, that I think it's worth asking, what if the intent of

95
00:07:30,120 --> 00:07:37,040
cuties actually was to condone pedophilia, to normalize it in some sense?

96
00:07:37,040 --> 00:07:38,400
What's wrong with you?

97
00:07:38,400 --> 00:07:44,600
Well perhaps now it's time to go back to the aforementioned website.

98
00:07:44,600 --> 00:07:50,920
Now what word do you think the pedophiles on this website repeatedly use when referring

99
00:07:50,920 --> 00:07:52,320
to their fantasies?

100
00:08:08,400 --> 00:08:33,800
It's worth noting that this website was fully operational before the film cuties was seen

101
00:08:33,800 --> 00:08:42,280
by anyone.

102
00:08:42,280 --> 00:08:47,360
And according to IPaddress.com, this site was up and running for almost a year before

103
00:08:47,360 --> 00:08:50,960
cuties debuted in France.

104
00:08:50,960 --> 00:08:56,040
Cuties simply means a cute person, especially girl or young woman, so it makes sense

105
00:08:56,040 --> 00:08:58,080
why film about young girls.

106
00:08:58,080 --> 00:08:59,080
What used the name?

107
00:08:59,160 --> 00:09:04,360
A name that when translated into French, where the film was based, is Magnona's.

108
00:09:04,360 --> 00:09:09,880
Nonetheless, it remains a fact that before the French film was even released, a large

109
00:09:09,880 --> 00:09:14,920
network of pedophiles were using the word cuties as their foundational term with which

110
00:09:14,920 --> 00:09:16,840
to label young girls online.

111
00:09:16,840 --> 00:09:19,880
But how do I know it's called foundational?

112
00:09:19,880 --> 00:09:24,880
Surely there are other words this network uses to reference children, right?

113
00:09:24,880 --> 00:09:28,320
Isn't this just an example of a kind of confirmation bias?

114
00:09:28,320 --> 00:09:35,080
I saw the movie cuties and now I'm trying to maliciously link it to this pedophile website.

115
00:09:35,080 --> 00:09:37,840
Why am I so focused on the word cutie?

116
00:09:37,840 --> 00:09:48,200
Well, the answer lies in the website's domain name.

117
00:09:48,200 --> 00:09:52,360
CutieGarden.org

118
00:09:52,360 --> 00:10:00,880
As seen in part two, when using control searches on Yandex, such as kids, boy scouts, SRC

119
00:10:00,880 --> 00:10:09,000
USA, the term boy, or girl, all of which pull up nothing concerning, because similar to

120
00:10:09,000 --> 00:10:15,400
Google and Duck Duck Go, Yandex is designed to hide in decent imagery of children.

121
00:10:15,400 --> 00:10:18,000
But what about the term cuties?

122
00:10:18,080 --> 00:10:23,040
Fortunately, when typing it into Google, other than a few images of the film, it pulls

123
00:10:23,040 --> 00:10:26,520
up nothing but the popular brand of oranges.

124
00:10:26,520 --> 00:10:30,480
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for Google's cousin.

125
00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:23,720
The reality that the term cuties has had a gruesome and indefensible meaning among predators

126
00:11:23,720 --> 00:11:31,200
online and still does to this day should be considered when deciding the intentions of Netflix's film.

127
00:11:31,200 --> 00:11:36,360
And ask for cutieGarden.org, let's work in Unison, and even though our efforts might

128
00:11:36,360 --> 00:11:41,720
ultimately prove futile, we can still try to protect the children currently being exploited

129
00:11:41,720 --> 00:11:47,480
there and report the URL together.

130
00:11:47,480 --> 00:11:51,960
Let's hope it works.

131
00:11:51,960 --> 00:11:55,700
With my YouTube channel removed, you're helped toward the continuation of my content

132
00:11:55,700 --> 00:11:56,700
as essential.

133
00:11:56,700 --> 00:12:01,280
Please consider clicking this green icon next to the sub button on my bitchube channel,

134
00:12:01,280 --> 00:12:03,640
and giving a buck a month on my subscribe star.

135
00:12:03,640 --> 00:12:05,560
You can also support me on Patreon.

136
00:12:05,560 --> 00:12:10,200
My small team of research peers are continually gaining access to new information.

137
00:12:10,200 --> 00:12:14,400
As I see at the platform is less important than the impact and the message.

138
00:12:14,400 --> 00:12:18,120
So if you want to see our videos continue and you think they're important, you think

139
00:12:18,120 --> 00:12:22,160
they're worth a dollar, please support them on subscribe star or Patreon.

140
00:12:22,160 --> 00:12:25,680
And keep your eyes peeled on my Twitter, where I'll be announcing the next drop.