1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,160
Basically all age groups, with the exception of the very elderly, have seen marked rise in suicide

2
00:00:06,160 --> 00:00:11,820
in the last 20 to 25 years. It's very highly correlated with use of technology. The more

3
00:00:11,820 --> 00:00:17,080
technology used, the more lonely people feel in a country. Today, two of the world's leading

4
00:00:17,080 --> 00:00:23,820
thinkers on bioethics and group psychology join me together for the first time. Dr. Aaron Carriotti

5
00:00:23,820 --> 00:00:29,200
is a former psychiatry professor and director of the Medical Ethics Program at the University of

6
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:35,300
California, Irvine Medical School. He is the author of The New Abnormal. Matthias Desmet is professor

7
00:00:35,300 --> 00:00:40,480
of psychology at Ghent University and author of The Psychology of Totalitarianism.

8
00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:48,760
Totalitarian leaders can only seize control in a society where a lot of people feel lonely.

9
00:00:49,240 --> 00:00:51,760
This is American Thought Leaders, and I'm Jan Jekielek.

10
00:00:54,420 --> 00:00:58,320
Aaron Carriotti, Matthias Desmet, such a pleasure to have you back on American Thought Leaders,

11
00:00:58,320 --> 00:01:00,080
and together, amazingly.

12
00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:04,620
It's great to be with you, and it's great to be with my new friend, Matthias.

13
00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:08,720
Likewise. Happy to be here, together with you, Aaron, and thanks for having us on.

14
00:01:09,240 --> 00:01:14,200
Well, so you were together in a session here at this Brownstone conference this year,

15
00:01:14,420 --> 00:01:18,620
and you brought up the issue, and this is something we've both talked about in previous

16
00:01:18,620 --> 00:01:24,880
interviews, I've talked about with both of you, is this issue of loneliness. And as the years have

17
00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:30,440
gone on, I keep thinking about it as a foundational issue. So I want to start by discussing that. And

18
00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:37,000
of course, atomization is this concept that comes from that. So maybe let's start with you, Aaron. You

19
00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:43,800
actually mentioned that Vivek Murthy said himself that there was this, you know, crisis or huge

20
00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:47,200
epidemic of loneliness, which is very much the case.

21
00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:52,260
That's right. Yeah. Murthy, a man with whom I have many disagreements, but on this point, he was

22
00:01:52,260 --> 00:01:57,600
absolutely right, announced in 20, I believe it was 2018, somewhere around then, that there was this

23
00:01:57,600 --> 00:02:02,780
epidemic of loneliness in the United States. And he wasn't just using that word sort of metaphorically

24
00:02:02,780 --> 00:02:07,600
to describe a social phenomenon. He was looking at it as Surgeon General from a health-related

25
00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:16,400
phenomenon and looking at robust data that loneliness produces negative health outcomes on the same level

26
00:02:16,400 --> 00:02:22,780
as smoking two packs of cigarettes a day, that this epidemic of loneliness was as serious in terms of

27
00:02:22,780 --> 00:02:29,640
compromising Americans' physical and mental health as heart disease, cancer, other things that the

28
00:02:29,640 --> 00:02:35,820
Surgeon General sort of traditionally pays attention to. In connection with that, there was a couple of

29
00:02:35,820 --> 00:02:41,360
researchers at Princeton, Case and Deaton, who were doing a lot of work around that time on so-called deaths

30
00:02:41,360 --> 00:02:48,060
deaths of despair. And deaths of despair, deaths by suicide, alcohol-related illnesses, and drug overdose,

31
00:02:48,440 --> 00:02:55,520
which since 1990, 1999 had been on the rise. So about 20-year rise in deaths of despair. Drug overdose

32
00:02:55,520 --> 00:03:02,920
deaths in 1999 were at 20,000 a year, which is a tragic number, but that had ballooned to 70,000 a year

33
00:03:02,920 --> 00:03:12,660
by the year of 2019. And then with COVID lockdowns and our response to COVID, we basically threw gasoline

34
00:03:12,660 --> 00:03:21,100
on that fire. And so that 70,000 number jumped in 2021 after lockdowns to 100,000 a year. Same thing

35
00:03:21,100 --> 00:03:30,280
happened with alcohol-related deaths, 69,000 a year pre-pandemic to 99,000 a year post-pandemic.

36
00:03:30,280 --> 00:03:35,180
And that crisis has continued to worsen. The suicide numbers from the CDC have continued

37
00:03:35,180 --> 00:03:41,200
tragically to go up every year. So basically all age groups, with the exception of the very elderly,

38
00:03:41,420 --> 00:03:48,020
those over the age of 75, all age groups in both men and women have seen marked rise in suicide in

39
00:03:48,020 --> 00:03:56,080
the last 20 to 25 years. That's hit adolescent girls, especially hard, with a tripling of suicide

40
00:03:56,080 --> 00:04:03,560
rates among adolescent girls. And all of these tragic, horrifying numbers. And of course, there's

41
00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:10,000
a devastated family behind each and every one of those statistics and a ruined life.

42
00:04:10,800 --> 00:04:19,000
Is this epidemic of loneliness that is contributing the social fragmentation, isolation, being locked

43
00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:28,680
behind a screen, fewer face-to-face interactions? If you asked a polling questions from some Gallup data

44
00:04:28,680 --> 00:04:38,340
back in the 1980s, if you ask people, Americans, how many Americans have someone in their life with whom

45
00:04:38,340 --> 00:04:43,340
they can discuss important matters? A family member, a friend, a close colleague at work.

46
00:04:43,340 --> 00:04:52,120
A majority of Americans said that they had someone three out of five to four out of five. Today, that number

47
00:04:52,120 --> 00:04:59,080
is much lower. And, you know, this is a proxy. There's many ways of trying to measure loneliness

48
00:04:59,080 --> 00:05:07,320
and social isolation. That study was just one of them. But I think all of this suggests a profound

49
00:05:07,320 --> 00:05:16,340
crisis in society. The causes are complex. Technological developments have certainly played

50
00:05:16,340 --> 00:05:23,780
a role. But I would say certain social and ideological developments have also played a role.

51
00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:29,240
Like what's driving us to embrace this technology? It's not the technology itself is not necessarily

52
00:05:29,240 --> 00:05:36,280
alone leading to all of these changes. Why have we as a society pursued the use of technologies in

53
00:05:36,280 --> 00:05:39,280
certain ways that lead to these kinds of problems?

54
00:05:41,700 --> 00:05:45,500
So before we continue, I'd like to introduce you to today's sponsor.

55
00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:52,340
Like many of you, I was initially quite skeptical about investing in gold. But with rising inflation

56
00:05:52,340 --> 00:05:57,200
and a lot of economic uncertainty, I finally decided to give it a try at the beginning of this year.

57
00:05:57,200 --> 00:06:04,120
Since then, gold prices have skyrocketed, reaching a record high of nearly $2,800 an ounce in late October.

58
00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:08,480
So the two ounces that I purchased have already increased in value by over $1,100.

59
00:06:09,100 --> 00:06:13,880
You too can protect and grow your wealth with Patriot Gold Group. Mention American Thought Leaders

60
00:06:13,880 --> 00:06:19,220
and you'll receive top-tier service. One of Patriot Gold Group's great offerings is their

61
00:06:19,220 --> 00:06:25,780
No Fee for Life IRA. So you can convert your existing IRA or 401k into physical gold and silver.

62
00:06:26,340 --> 00:06:32,320
To see if you qualify for this exclusive offer, just call 888-857-0495.

63
00:06:32,320 --> 00:06:38,200
Patriot Gold Group is a great company. They've been named Consumer Affairs' top-rated gold IRA dealer

64
00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:45,780
for seven consecutive years. So call 888-857-0495 today and request your free investor guide

65
00:06:45,780 --> 00:06:51,660
or scan the QR code below. Now back to the interview.

66
00:06:51,660 --> 00:06:59,660
You know, Matthias, you're looking at this from a different vantage point. Perhaps I'll get you to build on that now.

67
00:06:59,660 --> 00:07:09,540
Yes. I think it's very interesting to see how loneliness, to a certain extent, is a spontaneously emerging phenomenon.

68
00:07:09,540 --> 00:07:17,540
As Aaron mentioned, the use of technology plays a role. It's very highly correlated with use of technology.

69
00:07:17,540 --> 00:07:30,420
The more technology used, the more lonely people feel in a country, which is surprising, of course, because we always believe that technology connects us to each other.

70
00:07:30,420 --> 00:07:41,420
That's true at the level of the exchange of information, but it disconnects us. It disconnects us at the level of the resonating bond between humans.

71
00:07:41,420 --> 00:07:53,300
So it destroys the resonating bond to a large extent. So that's one thing, like this spontaneously emerging phenomenon as a consequence of the increasing use of technology.

72
00:07:53,300 --> 00:08:14,460
What is also very interesting, I believe, is that sometimes, sometimes it is intentionally created, like that is what Hannah Arendt said, totalitarian leaders can only seize control in a society where a lot of people feel lonely.

73
00:08:14,460 --> 00:08:35,220
Okay. Okay. They need loneliness, loneliness, which spontaneously emerged and which was used or abused by totalitarian leaders because they probably didn't know, but they just noticed that their propaganda was very efficient because there was a lot of loneliness.

74
00:08:35,220 --> 00:08:58,300
Once people feel lonely, people are very vulnerable for propaganda, and a new type of mass emerged in the 30th century, which Jacques Ellul called the lonely mass, meaning that like in medieval times, there were also mass formations and masses, but there were physical masses.

75
00:08:58,300 --> 00:09:07,460
People had to meet, people had to meet physically in order to experience this kind of group dynamic that I refer to as mass formation.

76
00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:20,680
And so mass formation has always existed, but in the 20th century, it became stronger because of the emergence of mass media and propaganda, but also because much more people felt lonely.

77
00:09:20,680 --> 00:09:47,300
And in this way, the propaganda really kicked in, became very successful and led to a new kind of mass, a lonely mass where people did no longer have to meet physically to form a mass, but could form a mass while they were all sitting in a lonely state in their houses because they were all infused by the same narratives through the mass media.

78
00:09:47,300 --> 00:10:16,180
And the interesting thing is the following, as soon as a totalitarian leader or a totalitarian system can use loneliness to seize control of the population, the first thing it will always do, according to Hannah Arendt, is replace loneliness by isolation, physical isolation.

79
00:10:16,180 --> 00:10:38,120
Meaning that it will try to prevent people from meeting, like Stalin did with more than two persons, because they know if you can use loneliness and replace it by physical isolation, preventing people to meet physically, propaganda is extremely successful.

80
00:10:38,120 --> 00:10:39,120
You have perfect control.

81
00:10:39,120 --> 00:10:40,120
You have perfect control to propaganda.

82
00:10:40,120 --> 00:10:48,120
So we can see that this atomization of society, on the one hand, was a spontaneous process, and that's the most important thing, I believe.

83
00:10:48,120 --> 00:11:02,120
It was a spontaneously emerging process as a consequence of the industrialization of the world, the use of technology, but it was also sometimes intentionally and artificially created by totalitarian leaders.

84
00:11:02,120 --> 00:11:21,120
And then there is a last thing that I would want to add to that, and it is that we really have to try to understand the complex relationship between loneliness and narcissism, because they are related to each other.

85
00:11:21,120 --> 00:11:33,120
And that's the deepest psychological level, that's the root cause of the phenomenon of the emergence of loneliness in our society.

86
00:11:33,120 --> 00:11:58,980
Like, something that I will try to describe in a tangible way in my next book, our modern world view started to emerge somewhere 16th, 17th century, when the human being left the religious view on man and the world behind and replaced it by the rationalist, materialist view on man and the world.

87
00:11:58,980 --> 00:12:19,120
It's not so much God that reveals the truth, we have to construct the truth, we have to construct the truth ourselves by observing the world with our eyes, and trying to understand the rational connections between the facts that we establish with our eyes.

88
00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:30,400
So, that metaphysical revolution in which the religious view on man and the world was replaced by the materialist view on man and the world, basically boiled down to this.

89
00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:34,720
The human gaze, the eyes, the focus changed.

90
00:12:35,140 --> 00:12:40,300
It was no longer focused on our ethical awareness and ethical rules and stuff.

91
00:12:40,400 --> 00:12:42,620
No, it was focused outwards.

92
00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:47,800
We started to believe that the real world is the world that we could observe with our eyes.

93
00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:56,960
And that was a moment where we also started to believe, at the level of our own identity, that we could see who we are in the mirror.

94
00:12:57,460 --> 00:12:57,600
Yeah.

95
00:12:57,840 --> 00:13:03,140
We are our outer mirror image, our ideal image.

96
00:13:03,140 --> 00:13:24,760
And that, at the same time, immediately, on the one hand, isolated the human being from other human beings, because in all human interactions, we were like a few percentages, which was enough to have a substantial impact, more focused on our own ideal image.

97
00:13:24,760 --> 00:13:37,880
Meaning that we couldn't see the image of the other image of the other, because we were more focused on our own outer ideal image and our own ego.

98
00:13:37,880 --> 00:14:02,880
So, and that the ego is literally like a superficial shell of your own being, and if you invest a lot of psychological energy, if you focus your attention on your outer ideal image, you get disconnected from the other, because you do not mirror the other's image anymore.

99
00:14:02,880 --> 00:14:07,000
And there is no spontaneous emergence of empathy anymore.

100
00:14:07,220 --> 00:14:10,460
So, the human bond gets weaker, the real human bond.

101
00:14:11,140 --> 00:14:19,700
And that, at the same time, explains like it's this rationalist fuel man in the world, at the same time, led to isolation and narcissism.

102
00:14:19,700 --> 00:14:30,880
And, I mean, you could see that in living color, as young people are curating and airbrushing their ideal image and projecting it literally onto Instagram.

103
00:14:31,720 --> 00:14:40,340
And they can't experience the real being together with other people in spontaneous, convivial friendship and relationship.

104
00:14:40,480 --> 00:14:42,020
You know, young people going to a dance.

105
00:14:42,020 --> 00:14:46,100
And the whole purpose of the dance is to take pictures and post them.

106
00:14:46,160 --> 00:14:48,820
Otherwise, it's like it didn't happen, right?

107
00:14:50,480 --> 00:14:56,660
And another thing that happens in that context is that one's own interior life disappears.

108
00:14:56,660 --> 00:15:13,280
And so, the possibility for real human friendship, intimacy, and connection that Matthias is describing also disappears, because it's one person's character armor, which is a psychoanalytic term that, you know, the analysts 100 years ago used to describe the narcissistic personality.

109
00:15:13,280 --> 00:15:30,100
It was characterized by this hardening, one person's character armor bumping up against another person's character armor, and society increasingly isolated and then characterized by conflict when people are together or are trying to connect.

110
00:15:30,100 --> 00:15:50,000
The other thing I'll say just to riff on Matthias' comments about the rise of a kind of rationalism over really the last 500 years is that the endpoint of that hyper-rationalist program or process can be seen, for example, in the philosophy of Karl Marx.

111
00:15:50,680 --> 00:15:52,680
And I'm not talking about his economic theories.

112
00:15:52,780 --> 00:15:59,580
I'm talking about Marx's metaphysics, his view of ultimately the world and how we know things and what human beings are.

113
00:15:59,580 --> 00:16:03,140
I mean, the first thing he said is basically, there is no such thing as human nature.

114
00:16:03,300 --> 00:16:05,760
We are what we make.

115
00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:25,840
And the whole project of rationalism and its kind of apotheosis in the 19th century was that we can recreate ourselves, we can recreate the world, we can recreate ourselves by recreating the world.

116
00:16:25,840 --> 00:16:29,000
That was basically the Marxist revolutionary program.

117
00:16:29,580 --> 00:16:43,800
And there is no already given elements in the world or in human nature that need to be respected and regarded or treated with a kind of contemplative gaze.

118
00:16:44,160 --> 00:16:48,160
Everything needs to be subjected to our rationalist control.

119
00:16:48,160 --> 00:16:55,160
This leads to a top-down managerialist society of total control and totalizing surveillance.

120
00:16:56,380 --> 00:17:04,820
It leads to sort of extreme ideologies like transhumanism that begin from the premise that there is no such thing as human nature.

121
00:17:04,820 --> 00:17:18,940
So we can just recreate ourselves and become demigods or bigger, faster, stronger through the use of, let's say, biotechnology or nanotechnology or other technological enhancements.

122
00:17:18,940 --> 00:17:28,760
And this program, I would argue, and Matthias, you could say if you disagree, ends up not being enhancing.

123
00:17:29,180 --> 00:17:30,940
It doesn't actually make us better.

124
00:17:31,940 --> 00:17:36,940
It certainly doesn't make us happier as the deaths of despair are suggesting.

125
00:17:36,940 --> 00:17:48,540
It ends up being dehumanizing because we aren't disembodied ghosts in a machine.

126
00:17:49,220 --> 00:17:54,200
We are not sort of reprogrammable software.

127
00:17:54,200 --> 00:17:55,400
We're human beings.

128
00:17:55,520 --> 00:18:21,080
We're embodied in fleshed spirits, if you will, that need to attend to all those different levels of our humanity and that need to connect with one another in real face-to-face bodily encounters where all of my senses are engaged in and my memory and my imagination are engaged in a real encounter with another person.

129
00:18:21,080 --> 00:18:42,460
And these things are stripped away and we're left with one of our senses, the sense of sight or the sense of sound that's kind of denuded by technology when we're just interacting over Zoom and we don't have the physical presence of the other person, all the subtleties that go along with that.

130
00:18:42,460 --> 00:18:54,920
So we're in the process of creating this unreal world and then trying to conform ourselves to a kind of virtual unreality that we were never built for.

131
00:18:54,980 --> 00:19:03,320
And that can only lead to unhappiness and misery and all kinds of downstream social problems.

132
00:19:04,160 --> 00:19:08,620
I definitely want to talk more about this relationship between narcissism and loneliness.

133
00:19:08,620 --> 00:19:14,200
I had never, frankly, thought about that and all would make a lot of sense given what you're just saying.

134
00:19:14,260 --> 00:19:15,740
But there's two things that just struck me.

135
00:19:15,800 --> 00:19:19,900
One of them is this, you know, this spontaneous rise of loneliness through technology.

136
00:19:20,020 --> 00:19:27,860
It's curious that a lot of that, these masses, it's all mediated, I don't know if ironically or just obviously through technology, right?

137
00:19:27,860 --> 00:19:37,840
So it's almost like the connection gets, to use the word, denuded through the fact that it's all seems to be, a lot of it seems to be mediated through technology.

138
00:19:38,040 --> 00:19:42,900
So it makes sense you would, you know, prevent physical contact at some level.

139
00:19:43,140 --> 00:19:45,680
The other thing that struck me is this cause and effect question.

140
00:19:45,680 --> 00:20:03,960
You know, is it with this, the totalitarians taking advantage of the spontaneous rise of loneliness, could it be the cause and effect is reversed, in fact, that the technology itself gives rise to more totalitarian tendencies because of these kinds of behaviors?

141
00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:06,680
I'd like to get you, either of you, to comment.

142
00:20:06,680 --> 00:20:08,180
I think it runs in both directions.

143
00:20:08,180 --> 00:20:18,400
So the technological developments obviously have an impact, but also the ideologies drive the technological developments and the widespread embrace of those technological developments.

144
00:20:18,500 --> 00:20:25,100
So you think about lockdowns during COVID, which is the most extreme example of what Matias was describing before.

145
00:20:25,200 --> 00:20:35,380
I mean, the 20th century totalitarian dictators from Stalin to Hitler never dreamed of such rigid controls on, I mean, they never told people to stay six feet apart.

146
00:20:35,380 --> 00:20:40,740
They never told people that they couldn't go to, you know, couldn't go outside or go to work.

147
00:20:40,800 --> 00:20:52,420
So the world globally and supposedly free Western democratic societies embraced a level of control and organized loneliness that had never been seen before.

148
00:20:52,520 --> 00:20:53,580
And the question is why?

149
00:20:53,640 --> 00:21:04,580
And some people have pointed out, well, if the laptop class had not, you know, already had available Zoom technology, then lockdowns never would have been possible.

150
00:21:04,580 --> 00:21:07,060
And there's certainly truth to that.

151
00:21:07,060 --> 00:21:27,700
But I think also we had been conditioned for decades into thinking that it's possible to live a human and humane life staying in my room and, you know, ordering my food from people that I will never actually see and actually never encountering a real person face to face.

152
00:21:27,700 --> 00:21:40,580
And somehow human beings globally had developed the belief that it was actually possible and in some cases even desirable to do that.

153
00:21:40,580 --> 00:21:43,280
And I think it's a very complex question to ask.

154
00:21:43,280 --> 00:21:59,860
How did we get to that point where something that would have sounded insane to people 50 years ago was something that was embraced with very few examples of dissent and pushback, at least at the level of cultural elites?

155
00:21:59,860 --> 00:22:03,440
Of course, how did we get to that point?

156
00:22:03,440 --> 00:22:13,680
Maybe first this, like if you look at it through the lens of just a medical emergency situation necessary to save people's lives, then the lockdowns have nothing to do with totalitarianism.

157
00:22:13,680 --> 00:22:31,200
But I think it's clear that you have to look at it through a different lens as well, at least, and see it in a wider project where they want to introduce 15-minute cities, a digital cosmos where people don't have to leave their house anymore and where they can travel to China or no matter where.

158
00:22:31,200 --> 00:23:01,180
In the virtual reality, yeah.

159
00:23:01,200 --> 00:23:06,960
Which almost always is part of a social problem, a problem in connection with other people.

160
00:23:06,960 --> 00:23:22,560
So many people actually, like many young people in Japan don't have sex anymore, many young people just prefer virtual reality over in-person contacts and conversations.

161
00:23:22,560 --> 00:23:37,600
And I feel it as well, something that is very enticing in the use of your mobile phone, mobile phones are our major addiction, I think, and the most dangerous one definitely in our era.

162
00:23:37,600 --> 00:23:58,780
And in that way, as soon as you start to see how throughout the last two, maybe three centuries, the social fabric deteriorated step after step how, for instance, the introduction of television, radio reduced the number of in-person contacts we had maybe with 50% or more.

163
00:23:58,780 --> 00:24:15,780
And then the introduction of the introduction of the internet with another 30%, how the disappearance of the physically labor, physical labor working together in a physical way also destroyed the direct contact between human beings and so on and so on.

164
00:24:15,780 --> 00:24:39,660
Then you start to understand how suddenly people who just because of their blind belief in this rational system and this rationalist worldview and their blind striving towards rational control and manipulation of nature in general and society in particular.

165
00:24:39,660 --> 00:24:53,780
How these people started to understand how these people started to understand how these people started to feel that maybe the next step could be taken and that we slowly could get people used to the fact that maybe it was better for everyone, that people stayed in their houses from now on.

166
00:24:54,700 --> 00:25:02,680
Better for nature, better for climate change, better for it will protect you from dangerous viruses and so on and so on.

167
00:25:03,120 --> 00:25:07,000
So that's indeed the situation we find ourselves in now.

168
00:25:07,000 --> 00:25:18,980
And if we do not start to really think about how we can escape it, I believe humanity might end up in a very well-organized prison.

169
00:25:22,680 --> 00:25:29,780
It's a kind of bizarre thing to think about and kind of it's a funny image.

170
00:25:29,900 --> 00:25:35,940
You have to laugh, but it's kind of a very dark future, right?

171
00:25:35,940 --> 00:25:40,700
Well, there's a real lack of intellectual humility.

172
00:25:41,020 --> 00:25:51,180
There's behind these converging ideologies, if you will, and converging uses of technologies.

173
00:25:51,180 --> 00:26:03,440
I think there is a lack of self-awareness and understanding, first of all, that the world is enormously and beautifully complex and complicated.

174
00:26:03,440 --> 00:26:14,380
And this sort of hyper-rationalist ideology says, no, we can figure everything out and then we can put the really smart people into positions of permanent power.

175
00:26:14,600 --> 00:26:26,200
And they can, in a top-down sort of managerialist control, organized fashion, tell everyone what to do and figure out all the dangers and minimize them.

176
00:26:26,200 --> 00:26:40,520
And it's a very naive view of the cosmos and of the world that we live in and the immediate lived environment,

177
00:26:40,520 --> 00:26:52,220
which is enormously complex beyond our reckoning and beautifully beyond our ability to fully comprehend it.

178
00:26:52,280 --> 00:27:02,820
So science, and I should say, and I'm sure Matias would say the same thing, both of us are a fan of science as a process for discovering more and learning more about the natural world.

179
00:27:02,820 --> 00:27:10,240
And I'm not opposed to technology as a way of managing our lives and the environment.

180
00:27:11,280 --> 00:27:27,800
But to put those things at the service of human beings and put those things at the service of the actual complex world in which we live in is going to require a very, very different approach than the one that we're, that the path that we seem to be going down now.

181
00:27:27,800 --> 00:27:48,800
Well, yes, the strangest thing is that I know no major scientists who, or rationalists, or major scientists, that's exactly what they conclude, that the essence of everything you study always transcends a rational understanding.

182
00:27:48,800 --> 00:28:06,800
That's the strangest thing, but in a strange way, while in the beginning, I believe scientific discourse initially, 16th century for instance, I believe that scientific discourse initially was a fine example of truth telling, truth telling.

183
00:28:06,800 --> 00:28:18,480
It was a small minority of people who went against a dominant discourse, which hadn't become, in many respects, a dogmatic religious discourse.

184
00:28:18,620 --> 00:28:21,420
So this small group of people went against it.

185
00:28:21,500 --> 00:28:23,180
And that's exactly what truth speech does.

186
00:28:23,320 --> 00:28:25,840
It destroys a common illusion.

187
00:28:25,840 --> 00:28:46,320
But as science, as a consequence of the first scientific discoveries, became dominant in society, as scientific discourse slowly became dominant, and that's what always happens with discourses that become dominant, it got perverted.

188
00:28:46,320 --> 00:28:57,820
Of course, because people started to use scientific discourse to make a career, to earn money, and the discourse got perverted.

189
00:28:57,900 --> 00:28:58,700
That's what always happens.

190
00:28:59,700 --> 00:29:05,680
Most discourses start as truth speech, and they turn into the opposite, into a fake discourse.

191
00:29:05,680 --> 00:29:20,440
And then, that's one important thing, that is something that happened in science, and somewhere along the road, science, and now, I think, now the academic world, what the academic world produces now, for me, has nothing to do anymore with truth speech.

192
00:29:20,540 --> 00:29:20,640
Right.

193
00:29:20,640 --> 00:29:22,560
Most sometimes, it happens, exceptionally.

194
00:29:22,880 --> 00:29:22,980
Right.

195
00:29:22,980 --> 00:29:23,080
Right.

196
00:29:23,080 --> 00:29:51,980
And let me add one more thing to that, something, another very important phenomenon, is the following, like, as soon as science emerged, and in its wake, the rationalist, materialist who owned the world emerged, people started to believe that rational understanding should be the guiding principle in life, that we should not think in the first place about whether

197
00:29:53,080 --> 00:30:23,060
something we did, something we did, something we did, was good or wrong, and a moral and ethical context, no, we started to think, what was the smartest way to do, and, so, as rational knowledge accumulated, our ethical awareness, awareness declined, and the combination of the two is extremely dangerous, because rational knowledge, accumulation of natural, natural, rational knowledge, makes you more

198
00:30:23,060 --> 00:30:48,060
It's more powerful, it gives you more powerful, it gives you more power, and if your ethical awareness, at the same time, declines, you have the recipe for evil honor, and that's what happens, but the first thing you could see was that these Western countries who had this scientific knowledge at their disposal, they started to colonize the world, for instance, started to use it to oppress others, and so on, and so on, and so on, and so on.

199
00:30:48,060 --> 00:31:13,360
Auschwitz itself was a hyper-rationalized environment of hyper-efficient death, as were the atomic bombs that we built during World War II, as maybe premier examples of what you're describing there, and I think we've moved now, especially in the context of institutionalized science and higher education,

200
00:31:13,360 --> 00:31:27,040
moved away from authentic science, moved away from authentic science and the ideal of science as the disinterested and self-skeptical pursuit of knowledge and hypothesis and testing and refutation.

201
00:31:27,040 --> 00:31:44,020
We've moved away from science into ideology that I call scientism, which is different than science, and scientism is the non-scientific claim smuggled through the back door that science is the only valid form of knowledge.

202
00:31:44,020 --> 00:31:54,100
And that claim contradicts itself, and that claim contradicts itself, and that claim contradicts itself, because science is the only valid form of knowledge, is itself not a scientific claim, it's a metaphysical claim that attempts to hide itself.

203
00:31:54,100 --> 00:32:21,460
But the exclusion of moral knowledge, but the exclusion of religious, spiritual, moral, metaphysical perspectives, the diminution of the humanities, of the arts and of literature and so forth in the context of what's really important in our education system, all of this points to a kind of totalitarian conception of science,

204
00:32:21,460 --> 00:32:39,100
where science attempts or people attempt to monopolize what counts as knowledge and rationality in the name of science, and of course, when you do this, you can anoint whoever you want to be the spokesperson for science, bringing, you know, the unassailable conclusions down from on high.

205
00:32:39,100 --> 00:32:54,980
And you get people saying, people in positions of authority in our society saying absurd things like, I am the science and he who questions me questions the science, which no real credible scientist would ever dream of saying such an absurdity.

206
00:32:54,980 --> 00:33:10,860
And so I think it's important, so as not to throw out the baby with the bathwater, that we draw this distinction between science as a method, and as a way of life almost, as a mindset, and a particular pursuit that is good,

207
00:33:10,860 --> 00:33:25,620
and scientism, which is hardened into an exclusionary monopolistic ideology that has actually nothing to do with the disinterested pursuit of truth, and everything to do with deploying power in a very authoritarian way.

208
00:33:25,620 --> 00:33:41,860
Is it a foregone conclusion that, you know, as the rational view of the human being, or perhaps the universe entirely grows, the moral view declines, or can there be a synergy?

209
00:33:41,860 --> 00:33:56,840
For me, for me, it's, you said, the rational view, that it's important to mention that for me, a rational view is completely opposite of a rationalist view.

210
00:33:57,620 --> 00:34:10,520
That's a strange thing, like, rationalism is the illusion that, ultimately, you can grasp the essence of the world, of nature, of everything around us,

211
00:34:10,520 --> 00:34:14,280
in rational categories, in rational categories, that's not true.

212
00:34:14,720 --> 00:34:16,420
Science rejected that idea.

213
00:34:17,060 --> 00:34:20,540
The essence of things always transcends rational understanding.

214
00:34:21,380 --> 00:34:27,960
But, so, the strange thing is, as soon as you fall prey to that illusion, as soon as you fall prey to the belief that,

215
00:34:28,160 --> 00:34:34,140
through your rational understanding, you will be capable of controlling and reparating everything, you will be capable of becoming God.

216
00:34:34,720 --> 00:34:36,980
Read, for instance, Harari, his homo deus.

217
00:34:37,480 --> 00:34:38,520
That's rationalism.

218
00:34:38,520 --> 00:34:45,360
The belief that, in the end, you will be capable of understanding, controlling and manipulating the essence of life.

219
00:34:45,940 --> 00:34:55,960
And that's, strangely enough, this rationalist illusion always leads humanity into the complete absurdity, for instance, of totalitarian systems.

220
00:34:56,200 --> 00:34:58,280
It leads to complete irrationality.

221
00:34:58,280 --> 00:35:11,940
If you're really loyal to rational understanding and walk the path, the way of rationality, step by step, you will soon arrive at the end where you will see this is the limit of rational understanding.

222
00:35:12,120 --> 00:35:13,360
Here we have to move on.

223
00:35:14,000 --> 00:35:21,100
Here we have to find a new way of knowing, which is this Einfühling where Einstein talked about.

224
00:35:21,100 --> 00:35:24,140
It's this sixth sense where Samira culture talked about.

225
00:35:24,640 --> 00:35:30,140
It's everyone knows that the real knowledge transcends rational knowledge.

226
00:35:30,240 --> 00:35:31,620
So, that's something extremely important, I think.

227
00:35:32,080 --> 00:35:35,440
I consider myself to be very, very rational.

228
00:35:36,120 --> 00:35:37,580
But I'm not a rationalist.

229
00:35:37,640 --> 00:35:37,980
Not at all.

230
00:35:37,980 --> 00:35:43,380
So, I think that's one thing that is important to mention, I believe.

231
00:35:43,640 --> 00:35:46,320
Like, real science has nothing to do with rationalism.

232
00:35:46,520 --> 00:35:47,120
To the contrary.

233
00:35:47,400 --> 00:35:48,320
It's opposite to rationalism.

234
00:35:48,320 --> 00:35:54,240
It involves, there's an aesthetic dimension to science.

235
00:35:54,340 --> 00:36:09,120
I mean, Einstein himself talked about seeing the truth of his theory of relativity and his great contribution to science and embracing it, not because he had irrefutable experimental proof for it.

236
00:36:09,160 --> 00:36:11,060
That actually came later.

237
00:36:11,060 --> 00:36:20,620
That was some experiments done at the University of Washington that, having to do with light being bent by gravity, that confirmed his theory.

238
00:36:20,960 --> 00:36:24,460
But he embraced the theory initially because he said it was beautiful.

239
00:36:26,000 --> 00:36:29,200
Not because he had irrefutable experimental, because it was beautiful.

240
00:36:31,160 --> 00:36:32,880
Because it was intuitively elegant.

241
00:36:32,880 --> 00:36:41,980
Because, you know, as he liked to put it, God did not play dice with the universe because of his, I mean, it was almost a mystical intuition.

242
00:36:42,140 --> 00:36:49,680
And then you can ask, well, how do, you know, we have the scientific method, but how do good scientists generate good hypotheses?

243
00:36:50,540 --> 00:36:52,360
You stop and think about that for a moment, right?

244
00:36:52,360 --> 00:37:02,160
The process of generating a good hypothesis, something that hasn't yet been demonstrated by an experiment, that has to involve some, it's not irrational,

245
00:37:02,160 --> 00:37:14,380
but some non-rational or supra-rational, intuitive, feeling toward, empathetic, something with the subject that you've been studying,

246
00:37:14,600 --> 00:37:22,860
that most scientists probably couldn't put it into words and describe it to you, or it probably would be difficult to teach unless you've got a knack for this sort of thing.

247
00:37:23,120 --> 00:37:24,000
You need sincerity.

248
00:37:24,560 --> 00:37:24,860
Yes.

249
00:37:24,860 --> 00:37:30,380
That's something that Einstein literally said in a foreword of a book of Max Planck.

250
00:37:30,480 --> 00:37:34,820
He said, many people think that science is born from rational thinking.

251
00:37:34,960 --> 00:37:35,700
It's not, he said.

252
00:37:35,780 --> 00:37:45,020
It's born from a capacity for Einfühlung, which is a German term which means feeling one or feeling into what you observe.

253
00:37:45,020 --> 00:37:53,980
And in a talk, in a speech he gave at a certain American university, I forgot which one exactly, maybe it was Harvard, I'm not sure.

254
00:37:54,300 --> 00:38:01,660
He said, I believe he said, that the best starting point for science is cosmic religious awareness.

255
00:38:01,940 --> 00:38:02,080
Yeah.

256
00:38:02,460 --> 00:38:03,440
Yeah, that's right.

257
00:38:03,440 --> 00:38:03,840
Exactly.

258
00:38:04,160 --> 00:38:11,440
And as you said, like, he didn't, relativity theory was not born from experimenting or rational considerations.

259
00:38:11,840 --> 00:38:18,980
If they're born, it was born from a certain intuition, from a certain feeling for aesthetical, sublime.

260
00:38:19,240 --> 00:38:19,460
Yeah.

261
00:38:20,440 --> 00:38:20,900
Theory.

262
00:38:21,280 --> 00:38:21,500
Yes.

263
00:38:22,460 --> 00:38:22,600
Okay.

264
00:38:22,600 --> 00:38:34,660
So art and science are perhaps less, real science, not so much the fake nonsense that it's turned out in our so-called peer-reviewed journals today.

265
00:38:34,660 --> 00:38:51,460
But real science, real, very significant contributions to our understanding of things is perhaps not as far apart from art, let's say, or even religion as our contemporary ideologies might have us think.

266
00:38:51,460 --> 00:38:58,480
I want to build on, we have a few minutes left, I want to build on this concept of sincerity that you mentioned.

267
00:38:58,720 --> 00:39:15,200
It seems to me like a lot of things boil down to people acting with sincerity and figuring out what that means in this strange technology, lonely, mediated world that we live in.

268
00:39:15,280 --> 00:39:19,120
And there seems to be, at least to my eye, a significant lack of that.

269
00:39:19,120 --> 00:39:25,360
And you seek it, you know it when you see it, and you go after it because you're missing it.

270
00:39:25,720 --> 00:39:27,400
At least that's what it's like for me.

271
00:39:27,760 --> 00:39:34,120
Maybe we're going to build a bit more on this, what you mean by the sort of finding the sincerity that you...

272
00:39:34,120 --> 00:39:53,360
Yes, somewhere in the beginning of our conversation I referred to the fact that loneliness and narcissism are actually two branches of the same tree, that they are over-consequence of human rationalist hubris that automatically this rationalism leads to two things like interconnected things.

273
00:39:53,360 --> 00:40:05,120
Loneliness of loneliness and narcissism and narcissism and narcissism and narcissism like what we've seen throughout the last 200 years is a triumph of the ego, like the ego became more and more powerful in the world.

274
00:40:05,120 --> 00:40:20,800
That means this identification of the human being with its own outer socially rewarded ideal image so that ego emerged, became stronger and stronger throughout the last centuries.

275
00:40:20,800 --> 00:40:40,740
And sincerity is exactly the act through which you punch a hole in your ego, literally speaking sincerely means that you reveal something, that you show something that doesn't match the ideal image.

276
00:40:41,060 --> 00:40:47,940
Something people usually hide behind their outer ideal image and you can almost feel that physically.

277
00:40:47,940 --> 00:40:51,080
My next book is about that, you can almost feel it physically.

278
00:40:52,160 --> 00:40:59,140
Sometimes you are in a situation, social situation, you feel like, oh, everyone is buying into this, but I do not agree.

279
00:40:59,520 --> 00:41:01,260
And you feel it doesn't feel well.

280
00:41:01,760 --> 00:41:10,100
And if you take this courageous decision then to say, I will articulate what I feel, you know two things.

281
00:41:10,620 --> 00:41:13,040
You will destroy your ideal image in that group.

282
00:41:13,040 --> 00:41:21,160
You know that you will say something that destroys the socially shared ideal image.

283
00:41:21,260 --> 00:41:22,320
And that's really the act.

284
00:41:22,380 --> 00:41:29,780
You feel it almost physically in which you push something that resonates in your body through the outer ideal image.

285
00:41:29,860 --> 00:41:33,840
You literally punch a hole in your outer ideal image, in your ego.

286
00:41:33,840 --> 00:41:51,140
And then the effect is that there is usually, if the other people can open themselves a little bit, can put aside their own prejudices and clinging to social ideal images and stuff.

287
00:41:51,980 --> 00:42:02,760
If they can open a little bit, you will see how the words that you articulated from the resonating strings of your body go through the hole in father's ego and make him resonate.

288
00:42:02,760 --> 00:42:03,420
And that's connection.

289
00:42:03,420 --> 00:42:06,440
And that's why truth connects people.

290
00:42:06,860 --> 00:42:09,240
It creates true social bonds.

291
00:42:09,800 --> 00:42:20,480
And that's why sincerity is the only remedy for a society sick of lies, propaganda, manipulation, deception, and so on and so on.

292
00:42:20,480 --> 00:42:38,480
So, and the possibility for that relies on a more ancient philosophical doctrine that all of us participate in a shared, well, the Greek word was logos, which sometimes would be translated as a shared rationality.

293
00:42:38,480 --> 00:42:44,840
But it's sometimes translated as word, order, reason, intelligibility.

294
00:42:45,300 --> 00:42:58,440
All of us participate in a transcendent logos that allows us to communicate with one another, to engage in a shared, sincere pursuit of truth.

295
00:42:58,440 --> 00:43:05,700
And allows us to communicate that and to share that in a non-coercive way.

296
00:43:05,840 --> 00:43:14,720
That the authentic pursuit and finding of truth does not happen through coercion.

297
00:43:15,380 --> 00:43:18,920
It doesn't use the methods of, it doesn't need the methods of propaganda.

298
00:43:18,920 --> 00:43:31,100
When I see, when the light of my intellect sees that two plus two is four, or Matthias demonstrates for me the, the, a proof of the Pythagorean theorem and the light goes on and I see that it must be.

299
00:43:31,100 --> 00:43:40,940
So, that light of truth compels my intellect, but without forcing my will, right?

300
00:43:40,940 --> 00:43:45,120
It's, it's compelling, but in a way that respects my freedom.

301
00:43:45,120 --> 00:43:58,020
I think the contemporary crisis that we are currently facing in the world, aspects of which we sort of touched on in this interview, is also an opportunity.

302
00:43:58,020 --> 00:44:13,980
Because many people are hungry for that many people have grown kind of sick and nauseated by a steady diet of propaganda that somewhere deep inside intuitively they know is not right.

303
00:44:13,980 --> 00:44:27,180
Even if they feel that they have to parrot these, these falsehoods and that act that you described so beautifully of taking off the mask and sincerely speaking the truth,

304
00:44:27,180 --> 00:44:30,640
which may be very simple in, in, in a particular situation.

305
00:44:30,640 --> 00:44:35,380
It may, it may be just stepping out of a group and saying, no, we can't do that.

306
00:44:35,440 --> 00:44:36,060
That's wrong.

307
00:44:36,180 --> 00:44:37,060
That's not okay.

308
00:44:37,860 --> 00:44:48,660
Um, because that's, that's not what we do to people or, you know, just speaking some simple moral truth that everyone in the room ought to know, but no one is acknowledging for whatever reason.

309
00:44:48,660 --> 00:44:56,660
Um, because of institutional or social forces or ideological forces that are getting in the way, um, that's very attractive.

310
00:44:56,660 --> 00:44:57,380
People are hungry.

311
00:44:57,380 --> 00:45:05,700
And I think if courageous people begin trying to live in that way, um, it can, that will grow.

312
00:45:05,900 --> 00:45:07,300
People will find one another.

313
00:45:07,300 --> 00:45:18,300
And, um, and, and, and we can, we can then begin to create small communities of people who, um, who are trying to live differently.

314
00:45:20,140 --> 00:45:21,060
Yes, yes, yes, yes.

315
00:45:21,060 --> 00:45:21,380
I agree.

316
00:45:21,460 --> 00:45:21,800
I agree.

317
00:45:22,140 --> 00:45:29,760
We have to practice the art of sincere speech with the same perseverance as the Samurai practiced in martial arts.

318
00:45:29,760 --> 00:45:34,000
Step by step, step by step, growing, becoming stronger as Mahatma Gandhi did.

319
00:45:34,000 --> 00:45:39,860
Uh, step by step, every day again, try to become more sincere, try to practice the art of sincere speech.

320
00:45:40,400 --> 00:45:44,060
I was wondering, uh, Aaron, would there be something we disagree about, you think?

321
00:45:44,140 --> 00:45:44,920
Could we find something?

322
00:45:45,800 --> 00:45:46,660
Well, I don't know.

323
00:45:46,740 --> 00:45:50,520
Maybe we, if we started talking about God, we might find some disagreements.

324
00:45:50,680 --> 00:45:52,040
I, we haven't gone there yet.

325
00:45:53,260 --> 00:45:55,460
Yeah, we'll definitely have to do this again.

326
00:45:55,780 --> 00:45:58,160
By the way, we could, we could unpack what you said about logos.

327
00:45:58,160 --> 00:46:02,440
Uh, also very interesting is the, the Greek concept of, uh, Parisia.

328
00:46:02,980 --> 00:46:03,120
Yeah.

329
00:46:03,120 --> 00:46:05,340
A bold speech in public space.

330
00:46:05,460 --> 00:46:05,640
Yeah.

331
00:46:05,840 --> 00:46:07,360
Uh, which always is very risky.

332
00:46:07,440 --> 00:46:10,840
The ancient Greek said, uh, the one who speaks the truth will, might be hated.

333
00:46:10,960 --> 00:46:14,620
There is a good chance because he destroys the illusions people find their stability in.

334
00:46:14,700 --> 00:46:14,840
Right.

335
00:46:14,900 --> 00:46:16,040
So they will be angry with him.

336
00:46:16,440 --> 00:46:26,080
But if there is nobody anymore, the ancient Greek said, who live up, who lives up to the ethical duty of Parisia,

337
00:46:26,080 --> 00:46:32,860
of speaking out these painful truths in public space, the police or a society is ready for the plague.

338
00:46:32,860 --> 00:46:39,460
Should we give, uh, a homework assignment to the, to all of us here to what is the sincere?

339
00:46:40,080 --> 00:46:46,180
Well, I, I, um, I, I've been working a lot and we've talked to Jan about the issue of government censorship.

340
00:46:46,180 --> 00:47:00,080
And I, I've talked about it in relation to totalitarianism, that the starting point for all totalitarianism is the prohibition of questions and the prohibition of dissent and the monopolizing of what counts as knowledge by the ideology.

341
00:47:00,080 --> 00:47:04,240
And then excluding people who, uh, voice dissenting opinions.

342
00:47:04,460 --> 00:47:26,480
And at the end point of that process, the, the external concentration camps and mass surveillance and secret police are no longer necessary because people have so internalized the ideology that a perfected totalitarian system wouldn't require those external, uh, sort of forcible methods of conformity.

343
00:47:26,480 --> 00:47:30,060
Because everyone is informing on everyone else, everyone's surveilling everyone else.

344
00:47:30,660 --> 00:47:34,780
And, um, well, and everyone's kind of controlling themselves to not do that.

345
00:47:34,900 --> 00:47:35,100
Right.

346
00:47:35,680 --> 00:47:36,820
They're, they're self-censoring.

347
00:47:36,820 --> 00:47:44,620
So a practical homework assignment is to notice times when you don't say what you think.

348
00:47:45,680 --> 00:47:50,860
I'm not advocating that you say every thought that comes into your head all the time in every social situation.

349
00:47:50,980 --> 00:47:55,120
Obviously there's discretion, there's propriety, there's all, you know, uh,

350
00:47:55,120 --> 00:48:03,440
but I think we have gone very far down the path of, of getting to the point where in certain social situations,

351
00:48:03,440 --> 00:48:09,220
we almost never say what we think on really important matters and we restrict ourselves to trivialities.

352
00:48:09,560 --> 00:48:18,100
And so recognizing when there may be moments where, no, this is a time for me to actually say what I believe to be the case.

353
00:48:18,100 --> 00:48:22,860
Um, and it may feel a little bit risky and it may have negative social consequences actually.

354
00:48:23,440 --> 00:48:36,600
Um, but in a society where no one does that, we are ripe for, um, misery and we're ripe for, we're perfect fodder for, uh, authoritarian rulers to exercise totalitarian forms of control.

355
00:48:36,600 --> 00:48:52,480
So push back against self-censorship, notice when you're biting your tongue, simply to go along, to get along and find ways here and there strategically to try to push back against that and to engage in the kind of sincere speech that Matthias describes so beautifully.

356
00:48:53,080 --> 00:48:54,280
Matthias, the final thought?

357
00:48:55,460 --> 00:48:57,260
Well, it's, it's just simple as that.

358
00:48:57,380 --> 00:49:06,280
I think that every time you speak sincerely, you inevitably will go through the dark night of the soul to use a concept of, uh, uh, the great, uh,

359
00:49:06,840 --> 00:49:07,640
mysticist.

360
00:49:08,640 --> 00:49:09,540
John of the cross.

361
00:49:09,820 --> 00:49:10,180
Yes.

362
00:49:10,240 --> 00:49:10,740
John of the cross.

363
00:49:10,800 --> 00:49:11,000
Yes.

364
00:49:11,140 --> 00:49:11,480
Thank you.

365
00:49:11,520 --> 00:49:11,780
Thank you.

366
00:49:11,800 --> 00:49:11,900
St.

367
00:49:11,940 --> 00:49:12,440
John of the cross.

368
00:49:13,040 --> 00:49:24,400
And, uh, it means that you will always, if you speak sincerely, you will inevitably lose something in the world of appearances and you will win something in the real world.

369
00:49:24,400 --> 00:49:24,680
Right.

370
00:49:24,960 --> 00:49:27,900
You have to accept that and go for the real world.

371
00:49:28,840 --> 00:49:32,980
Well, Matthias Desmet, Aaron Cariotti, such a pleasure to have had you on together.

372
00:49:33,160 --> 00:49:33,540
Thank you.

373
00:49:33,600 --> 00:49:33,880
Likewise.

374
00:49:34,120 --> 00:49:34,720
Thanks for having me.

375
00:49:34,720 --> 00:49:39,740
Thank you all for joining Aaron Cariotti, Matthias Desmet, and me on this episode of American Thought Leaders.

376
00:49:39,960 --> 00:49:41,260
I'm your host, Janja Kellek.