1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,000 Hi, Dr. Scott Jensen here. Over the last three years, we have together talked about a lot of 2 00:00:06,000 --> 00:00:13,900 issues. We have talked about masks and modeling. We have talked about lockdowns and social 3 00:00:13,900 --> 00:00:21,020 distancing. We have talked about vaccines and mandates. We have talked about parental rights 4 00:00:21,020 --> 00:00:26,100 and a whole lot of other things, including natural immunity, herd immunity, and what 5 00:00:26,100 --> 00:00:30,960 happened in nursing homes. Those issues will continue to be discussed as well they should, 6 00:00:31,720 --> 00:00:38,920 but I need to sound the alarm. I read medical journals all the time, and two articles that 7 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:48,400 had an odd connection over the last week came across my desk. First, Chris Mazzolini, editorial 8 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:55,020 director of medical economics, has an article about a book written by Wendy Dean, a physician, 9 00:00:55,020 --> 00:01:01,700 who talks about physician moral injury. You might ask yourself, what does that mean? 10 00:01:03,440 --> 00:01:11,200 Dr. Wendy Dean says that moral injury is this sense of feeling as if you're betrayed by somebody in a 11 00:01:11,200 --> 00:01:18,320 position of authority in a high stakes situation. And that situation causes you to transgress your 12 00:01:18,320 --> 00:01:24,940 deeply held moral beliefs and expectations. And in medicine, those beliefs and expectations are 13 00:01:24,940 --> 00:01:33,020 the oaths that we took to put our patients first. This is what's happening to physicians. When we feel 14 00:01:33,020 --> 00:01:39,820 that people in authority, who we thought had our back and were doing the right thing, that they 15 00:01:39,820 --> 00:01:48,700 controlled us and didn't perform. And that caused us to potentially compromise our commitment to our 16 00:01:48,700 --> 00:01:58,700 patients. That has happened across the land, across the globe. Let's turn to the second article. An 17 00:01:58,700 --> 00:02:11,700 article in Jazz Shaw called, The Medical Field is Erasing Its Own COVID Era History. Here's what it says. 18 00:02:11,700 --> 00:02:19,000 Pfizer and the rest of the big pharma companies assured the government that everything was just fine 19 00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:25,440 with the vaccines because they had been doing super serious testing. And the government dutifully 20 00:02:25,440 --> 00:02:32,480 reported the cheerful news to us while using all of that data to impose lockdowns, mask mandates and 21 00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:40,720 immunity passport systems. And now, according to one group that tracks publications in scientific 22 00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:49,760 journals, a lot of the original research and test results are mysteriously disappearing. More than 300 23 00:02:49,760 --> 00:02:58,480 papers and scientific articles have vanished in the past year. We have to be on red alert. What 24 00:02:58,480 --> 00:03:07,040 we're seeing is potentially substandard medical publications used to push forward, promote 25 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:13,920 a narrative and squash all other narratives. And now that some of the dust is settling, 26 00:03:15,040 --> 00:03:21,600 we're seeing these articles withdrawn, disappearing. You won't find them potentially on internet. 27 00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:31,840 This is problematic. We knew during the pandemic that several specific instances occurred where high 28 00:03:31,840 --> 00:03:39,280 quality journals, such as Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, published articles that a short time 29 00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:48,720 later required a retraction or a revision or a redaction. We're seeing this happen in spades now. We're 30 00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:57,280 seeing 300 plus articles disappearing. And I think you and I both know why. In many situations, 31 00:03:57,280 --> 00:04:06,000 it was shoddy research. It was shoddy analysis. It wasn't peer reviewed or the conclusions drawn from the 32 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:14,480 data were clearly spurious. And we asked the question, was this born of a nefarious agenda? 33 00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:22,960 My friends, I don't remember any time in my 40 years of medical history. We're in a short span of time. 34 00:04:24,720 --> 00:04:33,360 Journal articles in the hundreds and hundreds were disappearing. This feels like people are covering their tracks. 35 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:41,840 And we need to pay attention. When medical journals that were used at one time to push a narrative 36 00:04:41,840 --> 00:04:44,640 and squash another narrative are now disappearing. 37 00:04:44,640 --> 00:04:50,480 My profession has a big problem. 38 00:04:50,480 --> 00:05:20,460 Thank you.