1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:17,480 Julian Assange's return home was a long time coming those close to him wondered 2 00:00:17,480 --> 00:00:23,400 if he would ever make it out of prison can you describe the last 24 hours for 3 00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:29,520 us it's hard to describe we've been waiting for this for so long 4 00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:38,440 striking a deal between the US Department of Justice and the man they had been pursuing for 5 00:00:38,440 --> 00:00:46,480 years seemed at times impossible it was incredibly difficult logistically politically and legally 6 00:00:46,480 --> 00:00:53,520 for the first time two of the people closest to those negotiations reveal crucial details about 7 00:00:53,520 --> 00:01:01,960 how the deal was struck the sticking points the key players and how it nearly all fell over none of us 8 00:01:01,960 --> 00:01:06,960 when we started this case thought it was going to end in a courthouse in the Pacific 9 00:01:06,960 --> 00:01:22,920 in 2019 Julian Assange was arrested for breach of bail after Ecuador withdrew his asylum soon after he was 10 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:29,760 indicted under the US Espionage Act for publishing classified military and diplomatic documents as 11 00:01:29,760 --> 00:01:45,000 well as this infamous video showing journalists and civilians killed by US forces in 2019 the US under 12 00:01:45,000 --> 00:01:52,740 the Trump administration sought Assange's extradition from the UK Barry Pollock says the US Department of 13 00:01:52,740 --> 00:02:00,780 Justice was in no mood to negotiate after it became public that he had been charged their position was 14 00:02:00,780 --> 00:02:06,860 when he gets to the United States and has his initial appearance in the Eastern District Virginia we'll talk to 15 00:02:06,860 --> 00:02:15,000 you then after Joe Biden was elected president Barry Pollock saw an opportunity to negotiate the 16 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:21,980 Biden Department of Justice had issued new guidelines on prosecuting journalists and so I wanted to make a 17 00:02:21,980 --> 00:02:27,860 presentation to them why I thought under their new policy the prosecution should not proceed 18 00:02:27,860 --> 00:02:36,800 the department listened but didn't act but in 2022 another election result helped change the game 19 00:02:36,800 --> 00:02:47,120 just over a month after he was elected Anthony Albanese raised Assange's case with President Biden in Madrid 20 00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:54,000 around a year later in London the Prime Minister acknowledged that things were moving slowly 21 00:02:54,000 --> 00:03:03,260 I know it's frustrating I share the frustration I can't do more than make very clear what my position is and 22 00:03:03,260 --> 00:03:11,240 the US administration is certainly very aware of what the Australian government's position is but behind the 23 00:03:11,240 --> 00:03:19,940 scenes there was movement Jen Robinson says the Prime Minister gave her some important information he and I 24 00:03:19,940 --> 00:03:24,500 had a conversation where he said to me that they had been having conversations with the US administration and 25 00:03:24,500 --> 00:03:30,920 he felt that there was a deal to be done but it had to be done by us as his lawyers Anthony Albanese's new 26 00:03:30,920 --> 00:03:39,680 ambassador in Washington Kevin Rudd was about to become a key player in the push to release Assange I then flew to 27 00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:46,040 Washington to meet with Kevin Rudd our ambassador and my US co-counsel Barry Pollock where we briefed 28 00:03:46,040 --> 00:03:54,320 ambassador right about the case and talked about what this was going to take Kevin was very vested in 29 00:03:54,320 --> 00:04:03,680 this and he worked very doggedly with both the Department of Justice and myself trying to nudge each party to 30 00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:09,920 get to a resolution that was acceptable to both of us and I think a lot of times when you have a 31 00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:16,580 complex negotiation like that having a third party almost serving as a mediator to try to bring the 32 00:04:16,580 --> 00:04:22,320 two sides together is enormously helpful and Kevin played that role but despite their efforts the 33 00:04:22,320 --> 00:04:30,120 negotiations ground to a halt we worked on a deal for months that involved a series of misdemeanors 34 00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:36,180 about mishandling classified information that would have allowed us and him to enter that plea remotely 35 00:04:36,180 --> 00:04:44,880 and come home to Australia the DOJ then went quiet on that and we heard nothing for months on end but 36 00:04:44,880 --> 00:04:51,960 then a group of Australian politicians ramped up the pressure a cross-party delegation of MPs visited 37 00:04:51,960 --> 00:04:58,620 Washington to meet with members of Congress and the Department of Justice I think they made a 38 00:04:58,620 --> 00:05:06,780 difference I think the bipartisan support in Australia made a difference and I think Prime Minister 39 00:05:06,780 --> 00:05:12,960 Albany speaking out made a difference I think it was all of those things and the legal case unfolding 40 00:05:12,960 --> 00:05:22,560 in the UK increased the pressure on the US in February Julian Assange sought leave to appeal to 41 00:05:22,560 --> 00:05:30,120 the High Court in London it was seen as his last roll of the dice inside the UK legal system to avoid 42 00:05:30,120 --> 00:05:39,480 extradition but it was the last roll of the dice for the US as well and as internal emails published in 43 00:05:39,480 --> 00:05:45,840 the Washington Post show their own lawyers were worried one of their trial attorneys wrote the case 44 00:05:45,840 --> 00:05:53,940 will head to appeal and we will lose they knew the US couldn't guarantee Assange free speech protections 45 00:05:53,940 --> 00:06:02,080 under the First Amendment an assurance the UK judges were asking for I think they're under pressure on two 46 00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:07,680 fronts first was there was a very real chance that we were going to win the extradition case on this 47 00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:13,740 First Amendment ground because in our view the US could not provide a satisfactory assurance about 48 00:06:13,740 --> 00:06:20,040 protection under the First Amendment but the other point that people miss too is that the US was I 49 00:06:20,040 --> 00:06:26,880 think concerned about him being extradited and having a very public espionage act prosecution of 50 00:06:26,880 --> 00:06:32,940 a journalist in an election year at a time one of their journalists is in jail in Russia on espionage 51 00:06:32,940 --> 00:06:39,120 charges precisely you have a US journalist in prison in Russia Evan Gerskovich and the US is trying to 52 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:44,100 negotiate their release and what is the first thing the Russian government is going to say to them look 53 00:06:44,100 --> 00:06:50,120 at what you're doing to Julian Assange in the lead-up to the hearings Jen Robinson says she rang Australian 54 00:06:50,120 --> 00:06:56,180 Attorney General Mark Dreyfuss and alerted him about the weaknesses in the US case 55 00:06:56,180 --> 00:07:02,120 After my conversations with our Attorney General Mark Dreyfuss in January he went and met the Attorney General 56 00:07:02,120 --> 00:07:08,120 Merrick Garland in the United States and I think that was significant to make clear the Australian government's 57 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:18,120 position and also to set out the points that we had raised which is you may well lose this extradition case and this is the moment to get the deal done 58 00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:28,740 In May two High Court judges ruled that Julian Assange could appeal on First Amendment grounds putting even more pressure on the US to come up with a deal 59 00:07:28,740 --> 00:07:43,320 We really had two lines in the sand if you will one was that if we were going to reach some negotiated resolution that had to be the end of it Julian was 60 00:07:43,320 --> 00:07:49,320 not going to do any other any additional prison time the second was that Julian was very firm that he did not 61 00:07:49,320 --> 00:07:55,320 want to come to the United States for fear that if he did he would be detained on some other charges 62 00:07:55,320 --> 00:08:02,320 The US was insisting on a felony plea which meant Assange would have to appear in a US court 63 00:08:02,320 --> 00:08:08,320 The solution to hold proceedings in Saipan a US Commonwealth in the Pacific 64 00:08:08,320 --> 00:08:14,320 That was a proposal by the Department of Justice I think when it became apparent to them we were 65 00:08:14,320 --> 00:08:20,320 not going to move on those they came up with a very creative proposal that met our needs 66 00:08:20,320 --> 00:08:23,320 and that's what led to there being a resolution 67 00:08:23,320 --> 00:08:31,320 The negotiations over an agreed statement of facts took time as the parties argued over particular points 68 00:08:31,320 --> 00:08:39,320 I think it's really important to highlight for people what's not in the plea deal and that statement of facts and why it's important 69 00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:46,320 The first is no actual harm caused to any individual and the US government could not identify one individual 70 00:08:46,320 --> 00:08:50,320 who was entitled to restitution as a result of these publications 71 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:56,320 The second point that's really important is after years of accusing him of hacking of somehow doing something different to journalism 72 00:08:56,320 --> 00:09:03,320 If you read that statement of facts, it is about receiving and publishing information from a source 73 00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:07,320 That is absolutely journalistic activity 74 00:09:07,320 --> 00:09:11,320 Since the guilty plea, the Department of Justice released a statement saying 75 00:09:11,320 --> 00:09:16,320 Assange's decision to reveal the names of human sources illegally shared with him 76 00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:21,320 created a grave and imminent risk to human life 77 00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:27,320 Around a week before his release, the parties finally came to an agreement on a plea deal 78 00:09:27,320 --> 00:09:34,320 Until the final detail was negotiated and both sides were ready to sign a piece of paper 79 00:09:34,320 --> 00:09:37,320 You never knew 80 00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:40,320 How does it feel to be a free man, Mr Assange? 81 00:09:40,320 --> 00:09:44,320 It's still sinking in that we managed to pull it off and that he's home 82 00:09:44,320 --> 00:09:48,320 It's been a very long time coming 83 00:09:48,320 --> 00:09:59,320 How can we cybersecurity know that there's time 84 00:09:59,320 --> 00:10:01,320 You're the same, it's still going 85 00:10:01,320 --> 00:10:02,320 I think it's still going 86 00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:03,320 That's why it's still moving 87 00:10:03,320 --> 00:10:04,320 You're the same At that point 88 00:10:04,320 --> 00:10:05,320 It's still going 89 00:10:05,320 --> 00:10:06,320 I'm your scans 90 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:11,320 You're the same 91 00:10:11,320 --> 00:10:12,320 But it's still going 92 00:10:12,320 --> 00:10:13,320 I'm sure 93 00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:14,320 I'm your is 94 00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:16,320 It's still going