1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,700 Stephen Hawking faked this observation. 2 00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:03,960 How do we know? 3 00:00:04,280 --> 00:00:08,520 When I show you, you cannot make a claim that it was accidental. 4 00:00:08,980 --> 00:00:11,860 You can't make a claim that they didn't know. 5 00:00:12,520 --> 00:00:17,840 The only possible thing that could have happened here is deliberate fraud. 6 00:00:18,980 --> 00:00:19,860 Catch me again. 7 00:00:19,860 --> 00:00:27,080 The only possibility is deliberate fraud by PBS, by Stephen Hawking, by all three of 8 00:00:27,080 --> 00:00:29,520 these jokers, by the cameraman, by the editing team. 9 00:00:30,320 --> 00:00:33,120 By the helicopter pilot, they're all in on it. 10 00:00:33,760 --> 00:00:35,940 Because it's the only possibility for what we're about to see. 11 00:00:37,780 --> 00:00:39,420 Now watch the fakery here. 12 00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:46,060 What about the telescope height? 13 00:00:46,900 --> 00:00:48,040 Yeah, what is going on here? 14 00:00:48,880 --> 00:00:49,680 Freaking liars. 15 00:00:53,620 --> 00:00:54,380 Oh, does it? 16 00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:03,380 How the data points form the beginning of the curve? 17 00:01:03,620 --> 00:01:03,940 Mm-hmm. 18 00:01:04,160 --> 00:01:07,820 So that means this lake isn't flat. 19 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:08,900 No, it's not even close. 20 00:01:08,900 --> 00:01:10,060 It's not even close, no. 21 00:01:10,900 --> 00:01:11,640 It's crazy. 22 00:01:11,920 --> 00:01:13,220 This is from the official film. 23 00:01:13,320 --> 00:01:15,960 This is not edited or anything. 24 00:01:15,960 --> 00:01:22,380 You'll notice these are two different timestamps because this is two different portions of 25 00:01:22,380 --> 00:01:22,780 the film. 26 00:01:23,420 --> 00:01:27,120 One of them proclaims to be showing the helicopter going down. 27 00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:29,680 One of them portrays the helicopter going up. 28 00:01:30,100 --> 00:01:30,900 But we've got a problem. 29 00:01:30,900 --> 00:01:36,240 How would it be that the water is identical in both scenes? 30 00:01:36,780 --> 00:01:43,400 Ladies and gentlemen, it can mean nothing else than they have used chroma keying. 31 00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:50,240 They have used layering somehow to fake a helicopter behind this body of water. 32 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:52,180 This is not an editing mistake. 33 00:01:52,820 --> 00:01:54,860 This is nothing but all-out fraud. 34 00:01:56,320 --> 00:01:57,220 Look at the water. 35 00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:01,960 The helicopter here is about to descend below the horizon. 36 00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:05,860 How is it possible that we're looking at the same water, yet there's a helicopter in 37 00:02:05,860 --> 00:02:07,180 this scene, but not in this scene? 38 00:02:08,080 --> 00:02:10,460 It means that it's faked. 39 00:02:11,260 --> 00:02:12,200 Not accidental. 40 00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:17,720 And the helicopter here is about to crest the horizon and enter our line of sight. 41 00:02:18,220 --> 00:02:25,200 The waves of the lake in both scenes are identical, and the helicopter is not... 42 00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:29,780 The waves are identical. 43 00:02:29,900 --> 00:02:30,840 There is no arguing that. 44 00:02:31,080 --> 00:02:34,760 Go ahead and debate me that this was not faked by Stephen Hawking. 45 00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:37,160 And genius. 46 00:02:37,160 --> 00:02:40,480 The same bird applies the same path in both scenes. 47 00:02:40,480 --> 00:02:42,080 We've got a bird here. 48 00:02:42,120 --> 00:02:43,240 This is our trick photography. 49 00:02:43,600 --> 00:02:44,280 Helicopter here. 50 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:45,180 No here. 51 00:02:45,900 --> 00:02:46,180 Recordings. 52 00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:47,940 They're not real. 53 00:02:50,700 --> 00:02:51,520 They're not real. 54 00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:55,840 Nobody's going to stand up and speak out against a so-called scientific enterprise teaching 55 00:02:55,840 --> 00:03:00,780 children, coming across with some air of respectability, some air of correctness. 56 00:03:00,780 --> 00:03:04,920 And yet, they have completely frauded. 57 00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:11,100 If a know-nothing flat-earther did this, who had 100 views and 100 subs on YouTube, the 58 00:03:11,100 --> 00:03:13,360 globe community would lose their frickin' mind. 59 00:03:14,460 --> 00:03:15,640 He's faking it! 60 00:03:15,740 --> 00:03:16,620 It's not real! 61 00:03:16,700 --> 00:03:17,260 It's fake! 62 00:03:17,260 --> 00:03:20,140 But when this happens, it's not a big deal. 63 00:03:20,300 --> 00:03:20,800 It's just PBS. 64 00:03:21,020 --> 00:03:21,980 Just Stephen Hawking cares. 65 00:03:23,080 --> 00:03:25,000 The volunteers don't know it. 66 00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:27,240 I've asked three ordinary people. 67 00:03:27,640 --> 00:03:30,500 So with the help of a few ordinary people. 68 00:03:31,540 --> 00:03:32,360 It worked. 69 00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:33,780 I'm not a scientist. 70 00:03:34,240 --> 00:03:40,120 And to be able to just do that off a whim, and it just came to me, that was incredible. 71 00:03:41,080 --> 00:03:43,860 My name is Kat Babineau, and I am a scientist. 72 00:03:43,860 --> 00:03:47,100 And just so people know, because I've had people write me, say, well, maybe she became 73 00:03:47,100 --> 00:03:48,000 a scientist after. 74 00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:48,540 No, no, no, no. 75 00:03:48,860 --> 00:03:53,380 This video is from several years before this video. 76 00:03:53,860 --> 00:03:55,220 And this was not filmed two years early. 77 00:03:55,260 --> 00:03:56,280 You can look up when it was filmed. 78 00:03:56,620 --> 00:03:57,840 And this was definitely before. 79 00:03:58,620 --> 00:04:03,600 I admire Bill Nye, the science guy, Carl Sagan, for the work he did with Cosmos, and 80 00:04:03,600 --> 00:04:08,960 Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson for his continual work with The Cosmos Show, Dr. Stephen Hawking's 81 00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:13,280 with his perseverance and teaching us physics and all about the universe. 82 00:04:13,860 --> 00:04:17,280 I'm Kat Babineau, and I am a scientist. 83 00:04:17,980 --> 00:04:19,620 I'm not a scientist. 84 00:04:21,100 --> 00:04:28,000 So if you're wondering why there's flat earthers, it's because you've had opportunities to actually 85 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:31,900 show things like real science would do. 86 00:04:32,580 --> 00:04:34,980 And instead, you chose to fake it. 87 00:04:35,800 --> 00:04:37,280 Can you imagine being PBS? 88 00:04:37,280 --> 00:04:42,100 We're going to put up a fucking television program about how we know the shape of the 89 00:04:42,100 --> 00:04:45,080 earth and to show people we are going to fake experiments. 90 00:04:45,080 --> 00:04:49,200 It's baffling to me. 91 00:04:57,540 --> 00:04:58,600 Different timestamps. 92 00:04:59,880 --> 00:05:00,580 Identical water. 93 00:05:00,800 --> 00:05:01,460 Identical birds. 94 00:05:02,460 --> 00:05:03,000 It's fake. 95 00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:03,720 Oh, God. 96 00:05:03,720 --> 00:05:04,240 Oh. 97 00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:04,840 100%. 98 00:05:04,840 --> 00:05:04,960 100%. 99 00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:23,340 100%. 100 00:05:24,340 --> 00:05:28,900 100%. 101 00:05:28,900 --> 00:05:58,880 Thank you.