1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:04,320 George Soros is a legend in the world of investment management. When he moves money, the markets 2 00:00:04,320 --> 00:00:08,280 react. When he speaks, the world listens. He's also made an impact through a network 3 00:00:08,280 --> 00:00:12,820 of foundations dedicated to global economic and political improvements. He is the chairman 4 00:00:12,820 --> 00:00:18,240 of Soros Fund Management and the author of The Crisis of Global Capitalism, Open Society 5 00:00:18,240 --> 00:00:22,400 Endangered. I am pleased to have him on this program for a continuation of a series of 6 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:26,440 conferences we've had since I've been doing this program about the nature of the economy, 7 00:00:26,440 --> 00:00:30,640 capitalism, and how he sees the future. Welcome back. 8 00:00:30,640 --> 00:00:32,040 Nice to be here. 9 00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:38,200 Tell me about how, I mean, the origin of the book, because you have before laid out for 10 00:00:38,200 --> 00:00:42,480 me and others your own philosophical base in an open society. 11 00:00:42,480 --> 00:00:44,400 Right. 12 00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:49,280 Start with me by talking about the open society, in a sense, as a foundation, and where you have 13 00:00:49,280 --> 00:00:56,240 gone in your concerns about the economic crisis we face as we speak. 14 00:00:56,240 --> 00:01:01,440 Well, I started out with a framework that I really developed as a student when I was 15 00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:09,560 influenced by Karl Popper, Open Society and its Enemies, the totalitarian systems that impose 16 00:01:09,560 --> 00:01:19,240 themselves on the people by force in order to get their ideology accepted. And he counterposed 17 00:01:19,240 --> 00:01:29,760 to that the concept of an open society where it is recognized that nobody has a monopoly of 18 00:01:29,760 --> 00:01:38,440 the truth, that we are, that all views are, that we may be wrong. And therefore, we need 19 00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:48,960 a government that we are ready to replace, a democratic government, a market economy, critical thinking. 20 00:01:48,960 --> 00:01:57,680 So that was my concept of open and closed society. And of course, coming from Hungary, where I lived 21 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:06,160 through the Nazi regime and the communist regime, I was obviously in favor of open society. 22 00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:16,400 And I set up a foundation to foster open societies. Our goal was to help open up closed societies and make 23 00:02:16,400 --> 00:02:24,480 open societies more viable because open societies have deficiencies as well and foster a critical 24 00:02:24,480 --> 00:02:36,960 mood of thinking. Then, as the communist regime started to collapse, I got sucked into a revolutionary transition and 25 00:02:36,960 --> 00:02:49,280 I ended up setting up foundations in some 30 countries. And they did a lot of good, I think, just by allowing, 26 00:02:49,280 --> 00:03:02,480 empowering people who had a concept of an open society to move towards it. I don't have a definition of 27 00:03:02,480 --> 00:03:10,160 what an open society is. An open society has to define itself. So I let the people in the countries define themselves. 28 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:22,320 And then this framework didn't really work quite as I expected because the collapse of a closed society did 29 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:32,560 not lead to the creation of an open society. There was something missing. And I began to realize that 30 00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:42,400 that open society is threatened not only by a totalitarian regime, but also by an excessive reliance on 31 00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:51,200 market values. That there has to be something else to hold a society together. 32 00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:57,200 What caused you to come to the conclusion that there was serious danger, I mean, in, quote, 33 00:03:57,200 --> 00:04:02,960 runaway capitalism. Was it the economic crisis that you saw spring out of Asia and then spread 34 00:04:02,960 --> 00:04:09,120 to Russia and then threaten Latin America? No, no, because, because I started writing about it. 35 00:04:09,120 --> 00:04:16,560 I wrote an article in Atlantic Monthly in the beginning of 97. And I started writing the book when I 36 00:04:17,280 --> 00:04:24,880 got a lot of reaction to that article. And a lot of, and the article was actually widely misunderstood 37 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:32,640 because of the title capitalist threat. So I'm, I'm not opposed to capitalism. I want to improve it to 38 00:04:32,640 --> 00:04:43,680 make it more viable. So open society is sort of a, a middle ground, which, which is not, uh, neither the, 39 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:53,360 this, uh, uh, what I call market fundamentalism, uh, nor, uh, uh, let's say communism or socialism 40 00:04:53,360 --> 00:05:01,200 or nationalism. It's, it's, it's the recognition that all our systems are, are, are flawed. All our 41 00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:10,000 concepts are flawed. Then we must remain open, uh, to improvement. So there is an excessive belief now 42 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:17,680 in, uh, uh, the role of markets. Uh, and this, it's been carried, uh, to an extreme, which I think 43 00:05:17,680 --> 00:05:24,080 endangers our society. It endangers it because, first of all, markets, particularly the financial 44 00:05:24,080 --> 00:05:31,440 markets are unstable. Uh, but if the central core of, of, of what you fear about markets is the 45 00:05:31,440 --> 00:05:36,880 instability of the financial market. Right. Well, that is something that I know about and I'm on pretty 46 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:41,440 firm ground. Right. So there I have a, I think a pretty strong. And used to your advantage. Yes. 47 00:05:41,440 --> 00:05:50,160 Uh, that, I mean, that's my profession. Exactly. Uh, so, uh, so I think there I feel on firm grounds. Uh, 48 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:56,800 then I, uh, but I'm also concerned about the relationship between market values and let's say 49 00:05:56,800 --> 00:06:06,000 human values or intrinsic values. And there's something, uh, I think wrong if you allow market 50 00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:11,200 values to enter into spheres of our society where it doesn't properly belong. 51 00:06:11,200 --> 00:06:16,080 Well, you once said you'd rather be known as someone who's contributed something to philosophy 52 00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:21,680 than someone who had contributed, uh, nothing but the making of a lot of money. Right. And building 53 00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:27,520 up your own economic resources. Yes. Yes. Uh, staying with this idea of where you began to realize 54 00:06:28,240 --> 00:06:36,560 that capitalism had peril within it. Yes. Uh, in stable, unstable markets and the like. That came before 55 00:06:37,280 --> 00:06:42,880 the global economic crisis that we still witness. Very much so. Yes. Why, why then though? I mean, 56 00:06:42,880 --> 00:06:49,680 what was it that said to you before everybody else thought things could go wrong? Because I have a 57 00:06:49,680 --> 00:06:55,680 theory of markets, which is, let's say, different from the prevailing, uh, wisdom. Because prevailing 58 00:06:55,680 --> 00:07:02,880 wisdom is that markets tend towards equilibrium, which is true when markets deal with known quantities. 59 00:07:02,880 --> 00:07:11,200 But financial markets deal with not only unknown quantities, but actually unknowable quantities. 60 00:07:11,200 --> 00:07:19,520 Because the quantities that it deals with, uh, namely the future values, depend on how financial markets 61 00:07:19,520 --> 00:07:29,360 appraise them at, at present. So, uh, what financial markets do today has an impact on the economy, uh, tomorrow. 62 00:07:29,360 --> 00:07:37,760 So, so, so the concept of equilibrium is really not appropriate. Uh, I, I, I use the concept of 63 00:07:37,760 --> 00:07:44,640 reflexivity, which recognizes that there is this two-way connection, that markets don't just reflect, 64 00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:52,000 they also affect. And that doesn't necessarily lead to equilibrium. In fact, it can lead you quite 65 00:07:52,000 --> 00:07:57,840 far from equilibrium. Let me talk about the ideas that you raised here, and you began to think about, 66 00:07:57,840 --> 00:08:05,280 uh, before the economic crisis, but, but move ahead to the economic crisis. What, how did capitalism and 67 00:08:05,280 --> 00:08:12,000 unstable markets contribute to play a part in the economic crisis that we've seen sweep, as I said, 68 00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:20,480 from Asia to Russia to Latin America? Well, you had a, a, a variety of factors at play, uh, and different 69 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:28,240 factors affected different countries. But none of the factors was present in all the countries. What 70 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:38,400 was present was the free flow of, of, of capital, which is inherently unstable, uh, and tends towards 71 00:08:38,400 --> 00:08:50,400 boom bust. So that the, the bust was preceded by a tremendous boom. And the, since markets are unstable, 72 00:08:50,480 --> 00:08:58,880 we do have, uh, uh, monetary authorities, uh, that try to preserve stability. And we have, uh, you know, 73 00:08:58,880 --> 00:09:05,440 central banks in each country, and so on. We also have the International Monetary Fund, uh, and the 74 00:09:05,440 --> 00:09:13,920 regulatory system that, uh, that applies actually, uh, exacerbated the, uh, the, the problem. 75 00:09:13,920 --> 00:09:19,280 The regulatory system? The, the, uh, intervention by the International Monetary Fund and the Monetary 76 00:09:19,280 --> 00:09:22,320 authorities. Sure. What does this crisis say to you 77 00:09:23,840 --> 00:09:31,840 needs to be done? What does the threat that you saw from capitalism cause to be done? In other words, 78 00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:39,920 said better, what's, should we do and what's your solution? Uh, uh, we need to, uh, to recognize how the 79 00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:49,040 system works and, uh, and re, uh, reshape the, uh, mechanism for controlling the excesses. I think 80 00:09:49,040 --> 00:09:55,680 that the mission of the, of the International Monetary Fund, uh, has to be reconsidered. We need 81 00:09:55,680 --> 00:10:03,600 something like a, a new Bretton Woods for a, a world which is characterized by the free flow of capital, 82 00:10:03,600 --> 00:10:10,480 because the Bretton Woods was designed for a very different, uh, world. Now, before we have such a new 83 00:10:10,480 --> 00:10:19,600 Bretton Woods, we actually have to, uh, come to terms and, and, and, uh, with the situation and, uh, develop 84 00:10:19,600 --> 00:10:26,720 a, a, uh, some concept as to what the new system should work, uh, should look like. And that's what I 85 00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:34,720 try to do, uh, uh, in the book. But, uh, I will be the first one to admit that, uh, that, uh, I would 86 00:10:34,720 --> 00:10:40,480 say that, uh, I'm stronger on the analysis than I am on the solution. Okay, but how do you dampen the 87 00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:49,360 flow of capital that rushes crazily towards economic opportunity? Well, uh, what I have in mind is that 88 00:10:49,360 --> 00:10:56,800 when the flow of capital is turned off, then there is not enough. If you then provide, uh, some of, 89 00:10:56,800 --> 00:11:05,920 some official, uh, guarantees which allow the countries in need to, to access the market, then 90 00:11:05,920 --> 00:11:14,240 by withdrawing that support, you give a signal to the market that it is getting overheated. So it's by 91 00:11:14,240 --> 00:11:20,080 injecting money when, when it's not available, then you can, you have something to withdraw, 92 00:11:20,720 --> 00:11:29,200 which then gives a signal that, uh, uh, things are getting overheated. And then when, if there is a, 93 00:11:29,200 --> 00:11:38,880 uh, uh, a bust, you then, uh, uh, demand, uh, or, or, or allow the countries concerned to impose 94 00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:47,600 conditions on the lenders as well as, uh, uh, having to, uh, undergo some, uh, severe restrictions 95 00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:54,640 themselves. So you, you, you, you, you spread the, uh, the burden of the adjustment between lenders 96 00:11:54,640 --> 00:12:02,560 and borrowers. Uh, this is, this is incidentally what really should have been done in this crisis, 97 00:12:02,560 --> 00:12:09,600 because some countries have over borrowed. They had too much debt, uh, and not enough equity, 98 00:12:09,600 --> 00:12:17,520 for instance, Korea or Thailand. Now, actually lending them more money, uh, uh, uh, can't get 99 00:12:17,520 --> 00:12:24,240 you out of the trouble. You need to, uh, you need to, uh, change the relationship of equity and debt. 100 00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:33,760 So, uh, you really would have had to have some kind of a moratorium and some debt equity reorganization. 101 00:12:33,760 --> 00:12:40,720 It is happening now. Uh, let's say Korea has, has just moved in that direction, but it's one year 102 00:12:40,720 --> 00:12:49,360 after the, uh, the crisis. And so the, in the meantime, the economy has, uh, plunged into, uh, uh, 103 00:12:49,360 --> 00:12:55,120 severe recession. Uh, I think an earlier move would have abated this, uh, problem. 104 00:12:55,120 --> 00:12:58,720 World Bank has been critical of the IMF. Do you share that criticism? 105 00:12:58,720 --> 00:13:07,280 Uh, uh, yes, I, I think, but I, I also have a lot of, first of all, a lot of respect for the IMF, 106 00:13:07,280 --> 00:13:14,320 and a lot of understanding for their position, because their mission is, for their first task, 107 00:13:14,320 --> 00:13:22,480 is to preserve the financial system. So they want to make sure that the debtor countries, 108 00:13:22,480 --> 00:13:29,920 or the, uh, can, uh, meet their obligations, because if they defaulted, as they, as in the end, 109 00:13:29,920 --> 00:13:36,080 Russia did, it can disrupt the whole system. So they, since that is their concern, 110 00:13:36,080 --> 00:13:41,200 they want to stabilize the currency, because if the currency falls too much, then the debt, 111 00:13:41,200 --> 00:13:48,320 denominated, denominated in dollars becomes overwhelming. And they want to actually have 112 00:13:48,320 --> 00:13:55,760 the country go into a recession, so that it gets a, it, uh, has a trade surplus, which allows it to, 113 00:13:55,760 --> 00:14:02,960 to pay the debt. So they are confined by their mission, they do the right thing. But the effect 114 00:14:02,960 --> 00:14:10,000 is they raise interest rates to a punitive level, which then has a very negative effect on the economy. 115 00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:16,240 Whereas what, for instance, the Federal Reserve has done, when the crisis looked like it was 116 00:14:16,240 --> 00:14:21,680 beginning to impinge on our markets, immediately lowered interest rates, and lo and behold, 117 00:14:22,400 --> 00:14:31,280 we seem to be breathing easier. Do you believe that today, as we speak, um, before Christmas 1998, 118 00:14:31,280 --> 00:14:35,120 that the crisis is under control, and the worst is behind us? 119 00:14:35,120 --> 00:14:41,360 I think that the panic phase is behind us. You know, there was the, this wrecking ball that, uh, 120 00:14:41,360 --> 00:14:46,240 traveled around the world. The notion that it would somehow overwhelm us like a tidal wave. 121 00:14:46,240 --> 00:14:51,680 Right. That has been calm. That, I think, has definitely been calm. What we are now, uh, 122 00:14:51,680 --> 00:14:59,760 suffering from is the after effects, uh, the, the effect of the financial markets on the real economies. 123 00:14:59,760 --> 00:15:09,360 So you have a third of the world in, in, uh, severe recession. You'll probably have some more, 124 00:15:09,360 --> 00:15:15,840 because Brazil has yet to enter into a recession. But it's certain to? 125 00:15:15,840 --> 00:15:22,800 Brazil. Yes, but it's likely to. It's, it's, it's, uh, destined to, because the program calls for it. 126 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:26,720 Right. What do you mean the program calls for it? The IMF program calls for it. Okay. 127 00:15:26,720 --> 00:15:31,920 I mean the, even the government, uh, because this is actually, uh, a program designed by the government, 128 00:15:31,920 --> 00:15:40,240 uh, the Brazilian government. Uh, so, uh, you, you have already the, uh, and you have a, generally, 129 00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:47,440 a deflationary environment in the world today, because there's overcapacity, uh, demand is, of course, 130 00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:57,520 at the, at, at the low, uh, level, uh, and companies, uh, have to sell in order to generate, uh, positive 131 00:15:57,520 --> 00:16:08,720 cashflow in order to pay their debt. So now there's very little pricing power, uh, profits are under, uh, pressure, uh, 132 00:16:10,800 --> 00:16:16,720 investment demand is liable to decline since there is overcapacity. Uh, so, 133 00:16:16,720 --> 00:16:26,640 uh, it is, it is possible, although less likely today than it was two months ago, that the whole 134 00:16:26,640 --> 00:16:32,960 world economy slips into a recession. Let me come to the, the issue of where is, is a recession coming 135 00:16:32,960 --> 00:16:40,400 to the United States in your judgment? Uh, uh, it, uh, it's, it's, it's, uh, there will be a slowdown 136 00:16:40,400 --> 00:16:46,320 in the growth. Whether we go into a recession, I think, depends a great deal on what the market does, 137 00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:53,120 actually. Uh, if you had a, uh, a significant decline in the market, the stock market, you, you, 138 00:16:53,120 --> 00:17:00,320 it's more likely, it's likely to create a recession because, uh, um, our consumption now has become 139 00:17:00,320 --> 00:17:08,400 very much dependent on the, the capital gains that people make in the stock market. So instead of markets 140 00:17:08,400 --> 00:17:16,240 reflecting, uh, you know, uh, economic conditions, they are causing it. So, uh, uh, having lowered 141 00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:22,640 interest rates, uh, uh, uh, uh, maybe the market won't go down very much, in which case we may have a 142 00:17:22,640 --> 00:17:28,000 slowdown without a recession. Can you have a slowdown in the economic growth of a country 143 00:17:28,800 --> 00:17:34,800 and at the same time have its markets keep going up? Yes. I think, I think, I think, 144 00:17:34,800 --> 00:17:40,720 because it is something healthy about keeping the economic growth under control, uh, or within, 145 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:47,280 or, or in a sense. Well, when you have less, less demand for money for investments, but you have, 146 00:17:47,280 --> 00:17:55,360 uh, uh, uh, an easing of the supply of money, then a lot of that money finds its way into the stock market, 147 00:17:55,360 --> 00:18:02,720 which, which leads to, uh, uh, to, um, the increase in, in, in, in, uh, uh, in the values of stocks, 148 00:18:03,280 --> 00:18:09,600 might be, uh, excessive speculation in certain areas, which then you'll have to pay for later. 149 00:18:09,600 --> 00:18:14,720 But in the meantime, I think it's more likely to push prices up than down. And so you think the 150 00:18:14,720 --> 00:18:19,840 market is going to do what? Well, I personally think, uh, this, but this is really just a, a, a, 151 00:18:19,840 --> 00:18:32,480 a sort of a, a balance judgment, which, which, uh, uh, uh, I'm ready to devise as, uh, as events unfold. 152 00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:40,080 Uh, I, I think we are in a bear market actually, because of the pressure on, on, uh, on margins, 153 00:18:40,080 --> 00:18:50,240 uh, and, and, uh, and, uh, let's say the, um, the decline in investments that I expect to come. 154 00:18:50,240 --> 00:18:54,720 So therefore, if you were an investor, large or small, you eat, you ought to either sell short or 155 00:18:54,720 --> 00:18:58,800 get out of the market and find other avenues to invest your money. I wouldn't, I wouldn't, 156 00:18:58,800 --> 00:19:05,840 I wouldn't like to, I wouldn't like to go that far because, uh, actually in the final phases of a, 157 00:19:05,840 --> 00:19:10,000 of a bull market, sometimes the biggest profits are made. The final phases of a bull market. 158 00:19:10,000 --> 00:19:16,400 Yeah. And people who leave too early find themselves, uh, in great remorse later. Right. 159 00:19:16,400 --> 00:19:23,600 Have you, final question, have you yet done what you most want to be remembered for? 160 00:19:25,280 --> 00:19:33,200 Uh, apart from family, have you done with your personal life, have you achieved yet what you most 161 00:19:33,200 --> 00:19:39,600 want to be remembered for? I think so. And I think, and I think the book has a lot to do with it, 162 00:19:39,600 --> 00:19:45,200 because I actually want, uh, this is the book I always wanted to write and, and, and, and have, 163 00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:54,560 have it actually read. So I, I think, uh, I got there. Now, it's not the end of the road, 164 00:19:54,560 --> 00:20:00,000 because as I said, I think I'm better on the analysis than I am on the solution. 165 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:06,960 So I think, uh, I'll have to keep on working on, on, uh, trying to refine, uh, the solution. 166 00:20:07,760 --> 00:20:10,800 The crisis of global capitalism, George Soros. It's a pleasure to have you, 167 00:20:11,440 --> 00:20:13,360 as always. Thank you, George. Thank you. 168 00:20:13,360 --> 00:20:23,680 Thank you for joining us. See you next time.