1 00:00:23,339 --> 00:00:27,800 in principle, leaving any of the details to be filled in. 2 00:00:31,460 --> 00:00:35,640 It's the kind of belief system of people who say, "I don't believe in God, I believe 3 00:00:35,640 --> 00:00:37,159 in science." 4 00:00:37,159 --> 00:00:43,759 It's a belief system which has now been spread to the entire world. 5 00:00:43,759 --> 00:00:48,439 But there's a conflict in the heart of science between science as a method of 6 00:00:48,439 --> 00:00:56,079 on reason, evidence, hypothesis, and collective investigation, and science as a 7 00:00:58,219 --> 00:01:03,960 And unfortunately, the worldview aspect of science has come to inhibit and constrict 8 00:01:03,960 --> 00:01:09,920 the free inquiry which is the very lifeblood of the scientific endeavor. 9 00:01:09,920 --> 00:01:16,560 Since the late 19th century, science has been conducted under the aspect of a belief system 10 00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:23,079 or worldview which is essentially that of materialism, philosophical materialism. 11 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:36,459 I think that as we break out of it, the sciences will be regenerated. 12 00:01:36,459 --> 00:01:41,040 What I do in my book, The Science Delusion, which is called Science Set Free in the 13 00:01:41,040 --> 00:01:50,599 States, is take the 10 dogmas or assumptions of science and turn them into questions, 14 00:01:56,760 --> 00:01:59,760 None of them stand up very well. 15 00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:04,760 What I'm going to do is first run through what these 10 dogmas are and then I'll only 16 00:02:04,760 --> 00:02:09,080 have time to discuss one or two of them in a bit more detail. 17 00:02:09,080 --> 00:02:14,680 But essentially the 10 dogmas which are the default worldview of most educated people all 18 00:02:14,680 --> 00:02:19,919 over the world are first the nature's mechanical or machine-like. 19 00:02:22,199 --> 00:02:24,240 Animals and plants are like machines. 20 00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:25,240 We're like machines. 21 00:02:25,240 --> 00:02:27,120 In fact, we are machines. 22 00:02:27,120 --> 00:02:33,039 We're lumbering robots in Richard Dawkins' vivid phrase with brains that are genetically 23 00:02:33,039 --> 00:02:35,240 programmed computers. 24 00:02:35,240 --> 00:02:38,240 Second, matter is unconscious. 25 00:02:38,240 --> 00:02:42,599 The whole universe is made up of unconscious matter. 26 00:02:42,599 --> 00:02:48,439 There's no consciousness in stars, in galaxies, in planets, in animals, in plants. 27 00:02:52,360 --> 00:02:57,240 So a lot of the philosophy of mind over the last 100 years is being trying to prove that 28 00:02:57,240 --> 00:03:00,919 we're not really conscious at all. 29 00:03:00,919 --> 00:03:06,560 So the matter's unconscious, then the laws of nature are fixed. 30 00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:08,280 This is dogma three. 31 00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:12,520 The laws of nature are the same now as they were at the time of the Big Bang and they'll 32 00:03:12,520 --> 00:03:14,360 be the same forever. 33 00:03:14,360 --> 00:03:18,400 Not just the laws, but the constants of nature are fixed, which is why they are 34 00:03:26,240 --> 00:03:31,039 It never changes in total quantity except at the moment of the Big Bang when it all sprang 35 00:03:31,039 --> 00:03:35,439 into existence from nowhere in a single instant. 36 00:03:35,439 --> 00:03:38,379 The fifth dogma is that nature's purposeless. 37 00:03:38,379 --> 00:03:47,319 There are no purposes in all nature and the evolutionary process has no purpose or 38 00:03:55,560 --> 00:04:01,199 in epigenetic modifications of the genes or in cytoplasmic inheritance. 39 00:04:01,199 --> 00:04:03,319 It's material. 40 00:04:03,319 --> 00:04:08,360 Dogma seven, memories are stored inside your brain as material traces. 41 00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:13,360 Somehow, everything you remember is in your brain in modified nerve endings, 42 00:04:13,360 --> 00:04:14,360 proteins. 43 00:04:19,319 --> 00:04:22,279 it must be in the brain. 44 00:04:22,279 --> 00:04:25,600 Dogma eight, your mind is inside your head. 45 00:04:25,600 --> 00:04:30,959 All your consciousness is the activity of your brain and nothing more. 46 00:04:30,959 --> 00:04:36,939 Dogma nine, which follows from dogma eight, psychic phenomena like telepathy are 47 00:04:36,939 --> 00:04:41,699 Your thoughts and intentions cannot have any effect at a distance because your mind's 48 00:04:41,699 --> 00:04:42,699 your head. 49 00:04:49,720 --> 00:04:52,920 People believe these things happen, but it's just because they don't know enough about 50 00:04:52,920 --> 00:05:00,040 statistics or they're deceived by coincidences or it's wishful thinking. 51 00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:04,720 And dogma ten, mechanistic medicine is the only kind that really works. 52 00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:10,759 That's why governments only fund research into mechanistic medicine and ignore 53 00:05:13,019 --> 00:05:16,699 Those can't possibly really work because they're not mechanistic. 54 00:05:16,699 --> 00:05:21,860 They may appear to work because people would have got better anyway or because of the 55 00:05:21,860 --> 00:05:23,660 effect. 56 00:05:23,660 --> 00:05:27,500 But the only kind that really works is mechanistic medicine. 57 00:05:27,500 --> 00:05:33,420 Well, this is the default world view, which is held by almost all educated people all 58 00:05:33,420 --> 00:05:34,660 over the world. 59 00:05:34,660 --> 00:05:40,300 It's the basis of the educational system, the National Health Service, the medical 60 00:05:49,300 --> 00:05:53,980 But I think every one of these dogmas is very, very questionable. 61 00:05:53,980 --> 00:05:59,279 And when you look at it, they fall apart. 62 00:05:59,279 --> 00:06:03,800 I'm going to take first the idea that the laws of nature are fixed. 63 00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:08,680 This is a hangover from an older world view before the 1960s when the Big Bang Theory 64 00:06:10,019 --> 00:06:16,899 People thought that the whole universe was eternal governed by eternal mathematical 65 00:06:16,899 --> 00:06:22,500 When the Big Bang came in, then that assumption continued, even though the Big 66 00:06:22,500 --> 00:06:28,860 a universe that's radically evolutionary, about 14 billion years old, growing and 67 00:06:28,860 --> 00:06:34,819 and evolving for 14 billion years, growing and cooling and more structures and patterns 68 00:06:34,819 --> 00:06:36,500 appear within it. 69 00:06:40,759 --> 00:06:44,439 Bang like a cosmic Napoleonic Code. 70 00:06:44,439 --> 00:06:49,199 As my friend Terence McKenna used to say, modern science is based on the principle, 71 00:06:49,199 --> 00:06:52,639 us one free miracle and we'll explain the rest." 72 00:06:52,639 --> 00:06:56,360 And the one free miracle is the appearance of all the matter and energy in the universe 73 00:06:56,360 --> 00:07:01,079 and all the laws that govern it from nothing in a single instant. 74 00:07:08,220 --> 00:07:13,100 After all, human laws do, and the idea of laws of nature is based on a metaphor with 75 00:07:13,100 --> 00:07:14,100 human laws. 76 00:07:14,100 --> 00:07:16,339 It's a very anthropocentric metaphor. 77 00:07:16,339 --> 00:07:21,180 Only humans have laws, in fact, only civilized societies have laws. 78 00:07:21,180 --> 00:07:25,980 As C.S. Lewis once said, "To say that a stone falls to earth because it's obeying a law 79 00:07:25,980 --> 00:07:29,660 makes it a man and even a citizen." 80 00:07:34,060 --> 00:07:38,480 In an evolving universe, I think a much better idea is the idea of habits. 81 00:07:38,480 --> 00:07:40,779 I think the habits of nature evolve. 82 00:07:40,779 --> 00:07:45,279 The regularities of nature are essentially habitual. 83 00:07:45,279 --> 00:07:49,959 This was an idea put forward at the beginning of the 20th century by the American 84 00:07:49,959 --> 00:07:50,959 C.S. 85 00:07:50,959 --> 00:07:52,519 Purse. 86 00:07:52,519 --> 00:07:57,800 And it's an idea which various other philosophers have entertained, and it's on... 87 00:08:03,240 --> 00:08:07,199 is the basis of these evolving habits. 88 00:08:07,199 --> 00:08:12,519 According to this hypothesis, everything in nature has a kind of collective memory. 89 00:08:12,519 --> 00:08:15,459 Resonance occurs on the basis of similarity. 90 00:08:15,459 --> 00:08:22,759 As a young giraffe, embryo grows in its mother's womb, it tunes in to the morphic 91 00:08:22,759 --> 00:08:24,360 of previous giraffes. 92 00:08:29,319 --> 00:08:31,920 because it's drawing on this collective memory. 93 00:08:31,920 --> 00:08:37,039 It has to have the right genes to make the right proteins, but genes in my view are 94 00:08:37,039 --> 00:08:38,039 overrated. 95 00:08:38,039 --> 00:08:42,840 They only account for the proteins that the organism can make, not the shape or the form 96 00:08:42,840 --> 00:08:45,799 or the behavior. 97 00:08:45,799 --> 00:08:50,279 Every species has a kind of collective memory, even crystals do. 98 00:08:55,679 --> 00:09:02,279 first time you make it, it won't have an existing habit, but once it crystallizes, 99 00:09:02,279 --> 00:09:06,279 next time you make it, there'll be an influence from the first crystals to the 100 00:09:06,279 --> 00:09:09,080 all over the world by morphic resonance. 101 00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:11,080 It'll crystallize a bit easier. 102 00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:15,399 The third time, there'll be an influence from the first and second crystals. 103 00:09:20,360 --> 00:09:23,639 the world, just as this theory would predict. 104 00:09:23,639 --> 00:09:29,200 It also predicts that if you train animals to learn a new trick, for example, rats learn 105 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:33,559 a new trick in London, then all around the world, rats of the same breed should learn 106 00:09:33,559 --> 00:09:37,399 the same trick quicker just because the rats have landed here. 107 00:09:37,399 --> 00:09:42,360 And surprisingly, there's already evidence that this actually happens. 108 00:09:47,799 --> 00:09:51,679 Everything depends on evolving habits, not on fixed laws. 109 00:09:51,679 --> 00:09:57,679 But I want to spend a few moments on the constants of nature, too, because these, 110 00:09:57,679 --> 00:09:59,639 to be constant. 111 00:09:59,639 --> 00:10:03,960 Things like the gravitational constant, the speed of light, are called the fundamental 112 00:10:03,960 --> 00:10:04,960 constants. 113 00:10:04,960 --> 00:10:07,039 Are they really constant? 114 00:10:11,200 --> 00:10:14,919 They're given in physics handbooks. 115 00:10:14,919 --> 00:10:19,159 Handbooks of physics list the existing fundamental constants to tell you their 116 00:10:19,159 --> 00:10:21,360 But I wanted to see if they'd change. 117 00:10:21,360 --> 00:10:24,759 So I got the old volumes of physical handbooks. 118 00:10:24,759 --> 00:10:29,320 I went to the Patent Office Library here in London, and they're the only place I could 119 00:10:29,320 --> 00:10:31,759 find that kept the old volumes. 120 00:10:31,759 --> 00:10:34,919 Normally people throw them away when the new values come out. 121 00:10:34,919 --> 00:10:36,759 They throw away the old ones. 122 00:10:43,120 --> 00:10:44,639 20 kilometers per second. 123 00:10:44,639 --> 00:10:51,000 It's a huge drop, because they're given with errors of any fractions, decimal points of 124 00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:52,240 error. 125 00:10:52,240 --> 00:10:54,919 And yet, all over the world, it dropped. 126 00:10:54,919 --> 00:10:58,879 And they were all getting values very similar to each other with tiny errors. 127 00:10:58,879 --> 00:11:03,320 Then in 1945, it went up, '48, it went up again. 128 00:11:08,080 --> 00:11:11,080 I was very intrigued by this, and I couldn't make sense of it. 129 00:11:11,080 --> 00:11:18,000 So I went to see the head of metrology at the National Physical Laboratory in Teddington. 130 00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:21,960 Metrology is the science in which people measure constants. 131 00:11:21,960 --> 00:11:23,159 And I asked him about this. 132 00:11:23,159 --> 00:11:29,960 I said, 'What do you make of this drop in the speed of light between 1928 and 1945?' 133 00:11:30,960 --> 00:11:36,279 He said, 'You've uncovered the most embarrassing episode in the history of our 134 00:11:36,279 --> 00:11:40,840 So I said, 'Well, could the speed of light have actually dropped?' 135 00:11:40,840 --> 00:11:42,960 And that would have amazing implications if so. 136 00:11:42,960 --> 00:11:46,080 He said, 'No, no, of course it couldn't have actually dropped. 137 00:11:46,080 --> 00:11:47,080 It's a constant.' 138 00:11:47,080 --> 00:11:53,000 So, 'Oh, well then, how do you explain the fact everyone was finding it going much 139 00:11:53,000 --> 00:11:54,679 during that period? 140 00:11:54,679 --> 00:11:59,039 Is it because they were fudging their results to get what they thought other people should 141 00:12:00,039 --> 00:12:05,039 And the whole thing was just produced by, in the minds of physicists. 142 00:12:05,039 --> 00:12:07,200 We don't like to use the word 'fudge.' 143 00:12:07,200 --> 00:12:09,120 I said, 'Well, what do you prefer?' 144 00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:13,080 He said, 'Well, we prefer to call it intellectual phase locking.' 145 00:12:13,080 --> 00:12:24,440 So I said, 'Well, if it was going on then, how can we be so sure it's not going on 146 00:12:28,960 --> 00:12:30,600 And he said, 'Oh, we know that's not the case.' 147 00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:31,919 I said, 'How do we know?' 148 00:12:31,919 --> 00:12:34,840 He said, 'Well, we've solved the problem.' 149 00:12:34,840 --> 00:12:35,840 I said, 'Well, how?' 150 00:12:35,840 --> 00:12:41,600 He said, 'Well, we fixed the speed of light by definition in 1972.' 151 00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:43,480 So I said, 'But it might still change.' 152 00:12:43,480 --> 00:12:47,159 He said, 'Yes, but we'd never know it because we've defined the meter in terms of the speed 153 00:12:47,159 --> 00:12:48,159 of light.' 154 00:12:48,159 --> 00:12:50,519 So the units had changed with it. 155 00:12:52,159 --> 00:12:57,080 They'd fixed that problem. 156 00:12:57,080 --> 00:13:01,519 But I said, 'Well, then what about big G, the gravitational constant known in the trade 157 00:13:01,519 --> 00:13:07,360 as big G, as written with a capital G, Newton's universal gravitational constant?' 158 00:13:07,360 --> 00:13:13,279 That's varied by more than 1.3% in recent years. 159 00:13:13,279 --> 00:13:17,519 And it seems to vary from place to place and from time to time. 160 00:13:17,519 --> 00:13:20,000 And he said, 'Oh, well, those are just errors.' 161 00:13:24,840 --> 00:13:26,759 So I said, 'Well, what if it's really changing?' 162 00:13:26,759 --> 00:13:29,440 I mean, perhaps it is really changing. 163 00:13:29,440 --> 00:13:31,320 And then I looked at how they do it. 164 00:13:31,320 --> 00:13:33,799 What happens is they measure it in different labs. 165 00:13:33,799 --> 00:13:38,039 They get different values on different days, and then they average them. 166 00:13:38,039 --> 00:13:41,440 And then other labs around the world do the same, and they come out usually with a rather 167 00:13:41,440 --> 00:13:42,559 different average. 168 00:13:42,559 --> 00:13:44,279 And then the International Committee on Metronomy. 169 00:13:38,520 --> 00:13:41,460 labs around the world do the same and they come out usually with a rather 170 00:13:41,460 --> 00:13:44,640 different average and then the International Committee on Metrology 171 00:13:44,640 --> 00:13:49,200 meets every 10 years or so and average the ones from labs around the world to 172 00:13:49,200 --> 00:13:55,920 come up with the value of big G. But what if G were actually fluctuating? What if 173 00:13:55,920 --> 00:14:00,320 it changed? It does already evidence actually that it changes throughout the 174 00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:09,320 environment went through patches of dark matter or other environmental factors 175 00:14:09,320 --> 00:14:14,240 that could alter it? Maybe they all change together. What if these errors are 176 00:14:14,240 --> 00:14:18,040 going up together and down together? For more than 10 years I've been trying to 177 00:14:18,040 --> 00:14:22,240 persuade metrologists to look at the raw data. In fact I'm now trying to 178 00:14:22,240 --> 00:14:26,360 persuade them to put it online on the internet with the dates and the actual 179 00:14:30,200 --> 00:14:34,560 one time all down at another. If so they might be fluctuating together and that 180 00:14:34,560 --> 00:14:37,920 would tell us something very very interesting. But no one has done this 181 00:14:37,920 --> 00:14:42,160 they haven't done it because G is a constant. There's no point looking for 182 00:14:42,160 --> 00:14:47,640 changes. You see here's a very simple example of where a dogmatic assumption 183 00:14:47,640 --> 00:14:53,320 actually inhibits inquiry. I myself think that the constants may vary quite 184 00:14:58,040 --> 00:15:02,080 the day will come when scientific journals like Nature have a weekly report 185 00:15:02,080 --> 00:15:06,000 on the constants like stock market reports and newspapers you know. This week 186 00:15:06,000 --> 00:15:10,640 Big G was slightly up the speed on the charge on the electron was down the 187 00:15:10,640 --> 00:15:21,200 speed of light held steady and so on. So that's one area just one of one area 188 00:15:25,680 --> 00:15:29,680 biggest areas is the nature of the mind. This is the most unsolved problem as 189 00:15:29,680 --> 00:15:34,920 Graham just said that science simply can't deal with the fact we're 190 00:15:34,920 --> 00:15:40,160 conscious and it can't deal with the fact that our thoughts don't seem to be 191 00:15:40,160 --> 00:15:46,680 inside our brains. Our experiences don't all seem to be inside our brain. Your 192 00:15:51,600 --> 00:15:55,360 there's a little rupert somewhere inside your head and everything else in this 193 00:15:55,360 --> 00:16:01,160 room is inside your head. Your experience is inside your brain. I'm suggesting 194 00:16:01,160 --> 00:16:04,720 actually that vision involves an outward projection of images what you're 195 00:16:04,720 --> 00:16:09,480 seeing is in your mind but not inside your head. Our minds are extended beyond 196 00:16:09,480 --> 00:16:14,400 our brains in the simplest act of perception. I think that we project out 197 00:16:20,280 --> 00:16:24,600 look at you from behind you don't know I'm there could I affect you? Could you 198 00:16:24,600 --> 00:16:29,360 feel my gaze? There's a great deal of evidence that people can. The sense of 199 00:16:29,360 --> 00:16:34,040 being stared at is an extremely common experience and recent experimental 200 00:16:34,040 --> 00:16:39,240 research suggests it's real. Animals seem to have it too. I think it probably 201 00:16:39,240 --> 00:16:43,600 evolved in the context of predator-prey relationships. Prey animals that could 202 00:16:47,960 --> 00:16:51,600 would lead to a whole new way of thinking about ecological relationships 203 00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:56,640 between predators and prey also about the extent of our minds. If we look at 204 00:16:56,640 --> 00:17:01,400 distant stars I think our minds reach out in a sense to touch those stars and 205 00:17:01,400 --> 00:17:06,200 literally extend out over astronomical different distances. They're not just 206 00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:11,360 inside our heads. Now it may seem astonishing that this is a topic of 207 00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:22,079 images are is a hot topic of debate within consciousness studies right now. I 208 00:17:22,079 --> 00:17:27,200 don't have time to deal with any more of these dogmas but every single one of 209 00:17:27,200 --> 00:17:32,160 them is questionable. If one questions it new forms of research, new possibilities 210 00:17:32,160 --> 00:17:37,279 open up and I think as we question these dogmas that have held back science so 211 00:17:43,480 --> 00:17:47,559 believer in the importance of science. I've spent my whole life as a research 212 00:17:47,559 --> 00:17:53,820 scientist, my whole career. But I think by moving beyond these dogmas it can be 213 00:17:53,820 --> 00:17:59,000 regenerated once again and become interesting and I hope life affirming. 214 00:17:59,000 --> 00:18:02,000 Thank you.