1
01:00:00,200 --> 01:00:04,200
Music
00:23.000 --> 00:27.000
Basically I've got, as Anthony said, following up on what Anthony said
00:27.000 --> 00:31.000
and I've called this presentation Secrets in the Soul System
00:31.000 --> 00:34.000
which I've put together about a year or so ago
00:34.000 --> 00:38.000
but it's developed from various of the presentations I've put together over the years
00:38.000 --> 00:42.000
and so I'm probably have to skip over quite a lot of stuff
00:42.000 --> 00:45.000
so I think we're going to run, what time are we going to finish Anthony?
00:45.000 --> 00:47.000
Anthony, now we've got to start
00:47.000 --> 00:48.000
Okay, so
00:48.000 --> 00:49.000
Yeah, okay
00:49.000 --> 00:52.000
So I'll probably skip over quite a bit
00:52.000 --> 00:54.000
but that's why I can't write up this slide up
00:54.000 --> 00:56.000
I've got a stool in the back room there
00:56.000 --> 00:58.000
it's off to the side, if you haven't found it yet
00:58.000 --> 01:01.000
and I've got this DVD, I've got a DVD of this presentation
01:01.000 --> 01:03.000
which runs for about two hours
01:03.000 --> 01:05.000
and that costs you £50
01:05.000 --> 01:07.000
along with all the other DVDs I've got
01:07.000 --> 01:09.000
some of you who are familiar with these DVDs
01:09.000 --> 01:12.000
I do sell them through the website, check theedvids.com, that's my website
01:12.000 --> 01:15.000
so please get them there if they're running out today
01:15.000 --> 01:17.000
I've got a few copies of Dr. G
01:17.000 --> 01:20.000
with where the tellers go, some of you know my name
01:20.000 --> 01:22.000
may know my name connected with that
01:22.000 --> 01:24.000
we're still dealing with that issue
01:24.000 --> 01:26.000
so come to my store, come and talk to me
01:26.000 --> 01:28.000
most of this stuff is online
01:28.000 --> 01:31.000
apart from the actual text of the where the tellers go
01:31.000 --> 01:32.000
that's not online
01:32.000 --> 01:34.000
so everything else is online, so you don't have to buy anything
01:34.000 --> 01:36.000
I'm not going to make you money from this
01:36.000 --> 01:38.000
and following on from that
01:38.000 --> 01:40.000
you shouldn't believe anything I say
01:40.000 --> 01:42.000
because my background is in software engineering
01:42.000 --> 01:44.000
and I don't know anything about astronomy
01:44.000 --> 01:46.000
I don't know anything about any of this
01:46.000 --> 01:49.000
and I now assess the same students for a living
01:49.000 --> 01:52.000
I'm a tutor at the University part-time
01:52.000 --> 01:55.000
on a third-party program called Technologies and Practice
01:55.000 --> 01:59.000
so make of this what you will
01:59.000 --> 02:02.000
we're going to look in this presentation
02:02.000 --> 02:04.000
and we've got time for
02:04.000 --> 02:08.000
we're going to look at NASA and the other scientific data
02:08.000 --> 02:12.000
about Mars, Phogos, Iapetus and the Sun
02:12.000 --> 02:14.000
from the SOHO Proprimary
02:14.000 --> 02:17.000
we can ask are most scientists deliberately ignoring
02:17.000 --> 02:19.000
the most intriguing data?
02:19.000 --> 02:22.000
does the data indicate life and intelligence
02:22.000 --> 02:25.000
past or present elsewhere in the solar system?
02:25.000 --> 02:27.000
I would say definitely
02:27.000 --> 02:30.000
so we're going to start off with a little bit about Mars
02:30.000 --> 02:32.000
and Anthony will talk a little bit about
02:32.000 --> 02:34.000
just a few brief facts and figures
02:34.000 --> 02:37.000
basically the mass is about tenth of the Earth
02:37.000 --> 02:40.000
the volume is about 15% of the Earth
02:40.000 --> 02:42.000
the equatorial radius is about half
02:42.000 --> 02:44.000
the polar radius is also about half
02:44.000 --> 02:47.000
the mean density is about 0.7
02:47.000 --> 02:50.000
and the surface gravity is about third of what it is on the Earth
02:50.000 --> 02:53.000
so it is a different world, it's a smaller world as you can see there
02:53.000 --> 02:56.000
but there's still a whole lot of land on there to look at
03:00.000 --> 03:04.000
and it's interesting to note there's been an enormous amount of interest in Mars over the years
03:04.000 --> 03:07.000
there's been a flotilla of 50 space probes
03:07.000 --> 03:11.000
the first attempt made in the Russian Marsnik program
03:11.000 --> 03:14.000
with Marsnik 1 in 1960 so we're going about over 50 years now
03:14.000 --> 03:17.000
most of those were unsuccessful
03:17.000 --> 03:20.000
Mars 4 was the first successful probe
03:20.000 --> 03:23.000
which took place in July 1965
03:23.000 --> 03:26.000
and that incident was covered by a certain fellow called Richard Holland
03:26.000 --> 03:29.000
and that was done in a radio broadcast at the time
03:29.000 --> 03:33.000
of course there wasn't quite as much television then as there is now
03:33.000 --> 03:36.000
and I'll say there's been over 50 mission attempts
03:36.000 --> 03:39.000
with a number of failed and reported missions both from the USA and Russia
03:39.000 --> 03:42.000
the most sophisticated to date is probably the Curiosity rover
03:42.000 --> 03:45.000
which is as big as a car
03:45.000 --> 03:48.000
so a very complex robotic probe
03:48.000 --> 03:51.000
which I'll mention a little bit about later on
03:51.000 --> 03:54.000
but I got interested in Mars
03:54.000 --> 03:57.000
particularly, I tell this story every time I show this slide
03:57.000 --> 04:00.000
in 1976 when I heard the Viking probe was going up
04:00.000 --> 04:03.000
I was interested in it
04:03.000 --> 04:06.000
so the Apollo missions
04:06.000 --> 04:09.000
which I'll mention as well
04:09.000 --> 04:12.000
I've got a DVD about that
04:12.000 --> 04:15.000
the Viking 1 and Viking 2 each consisted of an orbiter and a line there
04:15.000 --> 04:18.000
some that went around the planet and some that actually landed on the planet
04:18.000 --> 04:21.000
primary mission objectives were to obtain high resolution images
04:21.000 --> 04:24.000
of the Martian surface, characterize structure
04:24.000 --> 04:27.000
and composition of the atmosphere and note there
04:27.000 --> 04:30.000
to search for life
04:30.000 --> 04:33.000
Viking 1 was launched on August 20th, 1975
04:33.000 --> 04:36.000
and arrived at Mars on June 9th, 1976
04:36.000 --> 04:39.000
so it takes just under a year to get there
04:39.000 --> 04:42.000
Viking 2 was launched on September 9th, 1975
04:42.000 --> 04:45.000
arrived July 76
04:45.000 --> 04:48.000
the total cost of the Viking project was roughly
04:48.000 --> 04:51.000
$1 billion
04:51.000 --> 04:54.000
so about almost 40 years now, $1 billion
04:54.000 --> 04:57.000
now the thing that I've got a clip about
04:57.000 --> 05:00.000
I've got a clip about this
05:00.000 --> 05:03.000
I'm not going to tell you too much about this on this slide
05:03.000 --> 05:06.000
but they carried an experiment which was specifically designed
05:06.000 --> 05:09.000
to detect microorganisms
05:09.000 --> 05:12.000
that you call total wave on release
05:12.000 --> 05:15.000
I've got a clip I'm going to play about that in relation to that
05:15.000 --> 05:18.000
as soon as I'm in a few slides time
05:18.000 --> 05:21.000
so they definitely carried something which was looking for life
05:21.000 --> 05:24.000
now Herbland tells this story
05:24.000 --> 05:27.000
that what happened is when Viking landed
05:27.000 --> 05:30.000
that they were getting their first colour pictures through
05:30.000 --> 05:33.000
I think on the second day, you'll see that in a minute
05:33.000 --> 05:36.000
and somebody
05:36.000 --> 05:39.000
when they first had the pictures they looked
05:39.000 --> 05:42.000
basically like the one on the left there
05:42.000 --> 05:45.000
with this sort of bluish tinted sky
05:45.000 --> 05:48.000
but then somebody came around and started adjusting all the monitors
05:48.000 --> 05:51.000
to give it a red looking sky
05:51.000 --> 05:54.000
and why would they do that?
05:54.000 --> 05:57.000
they were able to detect Mars the living planet by
05:57.000 --> 06:00.000
Gill Loving who designed the labelled release experiment
06:00.000 --> 06:03.000
I just mentioned and Barry E. Degregorio
06:03.000 --> 06:06.000
now what you find is that
06:06.000 --> 06:09.000
if you actually take the original NACS of data
06:09.000 --> 06:12.000
because these images that were taken by the Viking
06:12.000 --> 06:15.000
were actually taken with a micro main black and white camera
06:15.000 --> 06:18.000
and they were taken with a red, green and blue filter
06:18.000 --> 06:21.000
RGB, that's how you make a TV with RGB
06:21.000 --> 06:24.000
but if you go back and you download the original images
06:24.000 --> 06:27.000
the red, green and blue images from the Viking probe
06:27.000 --> 06:30.000
and you use the focus specifications that NACS used
06:30.000 --> 06:33.000
and you reprocess the image in Photoshop or another image in editing package
06:33.000 --> 06:36.000
the image at the top is what actually come out of it
06:39.000 --> 06:42.000
now
06:42.000 --> 06:45.000
when I found out that I was quite interested but I'm now going to play you a clip
06:45.000 --> 06:48.000
from a BBC document which was broadcast in 2009
06:48.000 --> 06:51.000
called Journey to Mars
06:51.000 --> 06:54.000
and you'll see it in a minute
06:54.000 --> 06:57.000
this particular clip was also reusing
06:57.000 --> 07:00.000
a 1976 documentary
07:00.000 --> 07:03.000
and there's the first piece of information coming in
07:08.000 --> 07:11.000
oh, oh
07:11.000 --> 07:14.000
say something to it
07:14.000 --> 07:17.000
yeah I'm supposed to say something at this point
07:17.000 --> 07:20.000
I don't like talking
07:20.000 --> 07:23.000
well there are rocks
07:23.000 --> 07:26.000
there's rocks and there's sentiment
07:26.000 --> 07:29.000
it's just incredible to see that the Mars
07:29.000 --> 07:32.000
is really there
07:32.000 --> 07:35.000
instant interpretation
07:35.000 --> 07:38.000
is always a little bit hazardous
07:38.000 --> 07:41.000
nonetheless many of these boulders do look
07:41.000 --> 07:44.000
very similar to the ones that we've seen in desert terrain
07:44.000 --> 07:47.000
some of these boulders may be
07:47.000 --> 07:50.000
fascicular, that is, basaltic rocks
07:50.000 --> 07:53.000
possibly volcanic rocks that have solidified
07:53.000 --> 07:56.000
in a gas-charged environment and these gases
07:56.000 --> 07:59.000
produce vesicles or holes
07:59.000 --> 08:02.000
just looks like a
08:02.000 --> 08:05.000
perfect set-down
08:05.000 --> 08:08.000
the first picture of the Martian panorama
08:09.000 --> 08:12.000
as you look at the field of view in general
08:12.000 --> 08:15.000
I think the most striking impression
08:15.000 --> 08:18.000
is one of a lot of rocks
08:18.000 --> 08:21.000
and this automatically brings to mind
08:21.000 --> 08:24.000
the fact that we had a good deal of luck
08:24.000 --> 08:27.000
because some of these rocks are about 2-3 metres across
08:27.000 --> 08:30.000
and had the spacecraft landed on those rocks
08:30.000 --> 08:33.000
it would have been disabled, probably permanently disabled
08:33.000 --> 08:36.000
later high-resolution pictures
08:36.000 --> 08:39.000
confirmed the rocks were volcanic
08:39.000 --> 08:42.000
but lying on dunes of fine sand
08:42.000 --> 08:45.000
on the second day
08:45.000 --> 08:48.000
the first pictures in colour
08:51.000 --> 08:54.000
Mars was indeed the red planet
08:54.000 --> 08:57.000
or at any rate, blue-red
08:57.000 --> 09:00.000
but the colours were false
09:00.000 --> 09:03.000
it was noticed that one of the cables on the spacecraft
09:03.000 --> 09:06.000
was not orange enough
09:06.000 --> 09:09.000
the colour was corrected
09:09.000 --> 09:12.000
and Mars turned even redder
09:12.000 --> 09:15.000
the reason for their mistake?
09:15.000 --> 09:18.000
the sky, everyone had assumed it would be blue
09:18.000 --> 09:21.000
like on Earth, but on Mars
09:21.000 --> 09:24.000
scattered dust turns the sky pink
09:24.000 --> 09:27.000
and makes sunsets purple
09:27.000 --> 09:30.000
oh really, well you may recognise the
09:30.000 --> 09:33.000
very famous actor, William Franklin
09:33.000 --> 09:36.000
he was claiming in his narration
09:36.000 --> 09:39.000
that they had a red cable
09:39.000 --> 09:42.000
so they judged the colour of the image
09:42.000 --> 09:45.000
based on the colour of the cable
09:45.000 --> 09:48.000
that's what he said
09:48.000 --> 09:51.000
this is false, basic research proves it is false
09:51.000 --> 09:54.000
you'll see here, I've got this right
09:54.000 --> 09:57.000
these colour calibration charts
09:57.000 --> 10:00.000
and guess what? calibrating the colour of the image
10:00.000 --> 10:03.000
so why is William Franklin in his narration
10:03.000 --> 10:06.000
going on about looking at the colour of a cable
10:06.000 --> 10:09.000
when they've got colour calibration charts
10:09.000 --> 10:12.000
and you can read a scientific paper about how those
10:12.000 --> 10:15.000
calibration charts were used
10:15.000 --> 10:18.000
so the BBC was putting out false information in its documentary in 1976
10:18.000 --> 10:21.000
and rebroadcasting the same false information in 2009
10:21.000 --> 10:24.000
why? now as I said I don't know anything about astronomy
10:24.000 --> 10:27.000
so if I can find that out, surely the BBC researches
10:27.000 --> 10:30.000
that make these horizon robes can find it out
10:30.000 --> 10:33.000
surely, the rest of my case
10:33.000 --> 10:36.000
and this happened over and over again
10:36.000 --> 10:39.000
this is from the Spirit Not The Juicy Robes
10:39.000 --> 10:42.000
they have this lightness joystick and what you see here is
10:42.000 --> 10:45.000
you see we've got a red panel on Mars
10:45.000 --> 10:48.000
but on Earth it was blue, this is impossible
10:48.000 --> 10:51.000
because this is reflective light
10:51.000 --> 10:54.000
it's blue because it absorbs all the light from the spectrum except the blue
10:54.000 --> 10:57.000
and it reflects the blue
10:57.000 --> 11:00.000
so if you've got red light coming from the sky of Mars
11:00.000 --> 11:03.000
shining red light on the blue paper doesn't make blue paper turn red
11:03.000 --> 11:06.000
it would sort of give a muddy grey colour
11:06.000 --> 11:09.000
so this happened over and over again
11:09.000 --> 11:12.000
I won't go through all the reasons, and then we have pictures like this for example
11:12.000 --> 11:15.000
this is an ESA picture from Mars Express
11:15.000 --> 11:18.000
28th July 2005
11:18.000 --> 11:21.000
this is a picture of a quantity of crater with water ice
11:21.000 --> 11:24.000
look today, 2005, we'll come back to this
11:24.000 --> 11:27.000
if this is some sort of ice, it's vaguely reflective
11:27.000 --> 11:30.000
so why is it blue?
11:30.000 --> 11:33.000
how can it be blue if it's reflecting colour of a red scar?
11:33.000 --> 11:36.000
and then similarly we have pictures like this
11:36.000 --> 11:39.000
this is from Mars Global Survey, it's very popular
11:39.000 --> 11:42.000
still very common that a lot of these pictures are still given in monochrome
11:42.000 --> 11:45.000
they don't give you the morning colour, they're still given in monochrome
11:45.000 --> 11:48.000
this is a green colouration
11:48.000 --> 11:51.000
this is from the Giuseppe crater
11:51.000 --> 11:54.000
which I think is where the Spirit rover landed
11:54.000 --> 11:57.000
these rovers landed in 2004
11:57.000 --> 12:00.000
it's claimed by some people
12:00.000 --> 12:03.000
that NASA has filtered some of the images
12:03.000 --> 12:06.000
to hide the presence of chloropon
12:06.000 --> 12:09.000
which is a green colour, that's what's in the rocks and it causes
12:09.000 --> 12:12.000
that's what allows for the synthesis
12:12.000 --> 12:15.000
now we'll get into some more data that's ignored
12:15.000 --> 12:18.000
and re-reported in fact
12:18.000 --> 12:21.000
we'll come onto that
12:21.000 --> 12:24.000
in July 2004 it was stated by Professor Vittorio Formisano
12:24.000 --> 12:27.000
that Mars Express implementation had detected
12:27.000 --> 12:30.000
ammonia, methane and even fluorine in the Martian atmosphere
12:30.000 --> 12:33.000
these are biomarker gases indicating ongoing life processes
12:33.000 --> 12:36.000
in February 2005 Formisano said
12:36.000 --> 12:39.000
my observations should not be taken as a statement
12:39.000 --> 12:42.000
there is a life on Mars today
12:42.000 --> 12:45.000
because we need to go there, to drill the soil, to take samples
12:45.000 --> 12:48.000
and analyse them before possibly concluding that life is there
12:48.000 --> 12:51.000
I'm sorry but that's what writing did in 1976
12:51.000 --> 12:54.000
over 20 years earlier
12:54.000 --> 12:57.000
and Gilbert Ludden's experiment worked to detect living microorganisms
12:57.000 --> 13:00.000
in the soil, again I'll come back to that
13:00.000 --> 13:03.000
Formisano, a space scientist, forgot about that
13:03.000 --> 13:06.000
seems very strange going on here
13:06.000 --> 13:09.000
and then again, 2009
13:09.000 --> 13:12.000
four years later
13:12.000 --> 13:15.000
NASA, methane clouds could be evidence of life on Mars
13:15.000 --> 13:18.000
2015, 2009
13:18.000 --> 13:21.000
it's in the Belfast Telegraph
13:21.000 --> 13:24.000
but it's also NASA's own website
13:24.000 --> 13:27.000
Mars and methane reveals that the red planet is not a dead planet
13:27.000 --> 13:30.000
2009, 15th of January
13:30.000 --> 13:33.000
why, I'm not going to say it here, we go again
13:33.000 --> 13:36.000
we have similar reports again
13:36.000 --> 13:39.000
on 4th of December 2012, less than a year ago
13:39.000 --> 13:42.000
curiosity rover detects water and organic compounds on Mars
13:42.000 --> 13:45.000
the rover also detected its first organic compounds
13:45.000 --> 13:48.000
in the form of chlorinated methane
13:48.000 --> 13:51.000
created during the analysis process
13:51.000 --> 13:54.000
within the sample analysis at Mars tool
13:54.000 --> 13:57.000
however, while the chlorine is definitely from Mars
13:57.000 --> 14:24.600
the carbon might be more earthy and more
14:24.600 --> 14:27.200
I believe that Viking found life
14:27.200 --> 14:30.200
and I think that maybe not intentionally
14:30.200 --> 14:33.200
but scientists painted the wrong picture
14:33.200 --> 14:36.200
of what happened in the past
14:36.200 --> 14:39.200
and I think that's a good point
14:39.200 --> 14:42.200
and I think that's a good point
14:42.200 --> 14:45.200
and I think that's a good point
14:45.200 --> 14:48.200
and I think that's a good point
14:48.200 --> 14:51.200
and I think that's a good point
14:51.200 --> 14:54.200
and I think that's a good point
14:54.200 --> 14:57.200
and I think that's a good point
14:57.200 --> 15:00.200
and I think that's a good point
15:00.200 --> 15:03.200
and I think that's a good point
15:03.200 --> 15:06.200
and I think that's a good point
15:06.200 --> 15:09.200
and I think that's a good point
15:09.200 --> 15:12.200
and I think that's a good point
15:12.200 --> 15:15.200
and I think that's a good point
15:15.200 --> 15:18.200
and I think that's a good point
15:18.200 --> 15:21.200
and I think that's a good point
15:21.200 --> 15:24.200
and I think that's a good point
15:24.200 --> 15:27.200
and I think that's a good point
15:27.200 --> 15:30.200
and I think that's a good point
15:30.200 --> 15:33.200
and I think that's a good point
15:33.200 --> 15:36.200
and I think that's a good point
15:36.200 --> 15:39.200
and I think that's a good point
15:39.200 --> 15:42.200
and I think that's a good point
15:42.200 --> 15:45.200
and I think that's a good point
15:45.200 --> 15:48.200
and I think that's a good point
15:48.200 --> 15:51.200
and I think that's a good point
15:51.200 --> 15:54.200
and I think that's a good point
15:54.200 --> 15:57.200
and I think that's a good point
15:57.200 --> 16:00.200
and I think that's a good point
16:00.200 --> 16:03.200
and I think that's a good point
16:03.200 --> 16:06.200
and I think that's a good point
16:06.200 --> 16:09.200
and I think that's a good point
16:09.200 --> 16:12.200
and I think that's a good point
16:12.200 --> 16:15.200
and I think that's a good point
16:15.200 --> 16:18.200
and I think that's a good point
16:18.200 --> 16:21.200
and I think that's a good point
16:21.200 --> 16:24.200
and I think that's a good point
16:24.200 --> 16:27.200
and I think that's a good point
16:27.200 --> 16:30.200
and I think that's a good point
16:30.200 --> 16:33.200
and I think that's a good point
16:33.200 --> 16:36.200
and I think that's a good point
16:36.200 --> 16:39.200
and I think that's a good point
16:39.200 --> 16:42.200
and I think that's a good point
16:42.200 --> 16:45.200
and I think that's a good point
16:45.200 --> 16:48.200
and I think that's a good point
16:48.200 --> 16:51.200
and I think that's a good point
16:51.200 --> 16:54.200
and I think that's a good point
16:54.200 --> 16:57.200
and I think that's a good point
16:57.200 --> 17:00.200
and I think that's a good point
17:00.200 --> 17:03.200
and I think that's a good point
17:03.200 --> 17:06.200
and I think that's a good point
17:06.200 --> 17:09.200
and I think that's a good point
17:09.200 --> 17:12.200
and I think that's a good point
17:12.200 --> 17:15.200
and I think that's a good point
17:15.200 --> 17:18.200
and I think that's a good point
17:18.200 --> 17:21.200
and I think that's a good point
17:21.200 --> 17:24.200
and I think that's a good point
17:24.200 --> 17:27.200
and I think that's a good point
17:27.200 --> 17:30.200
and I think that's a good point
17:30.200 --> 17:33.200
and I think that's a good point
17:33.200 --> 17:36.200
and I think that's a good point
17:36.200 --> 17:39.200
and I think that's a good point
17:39.200 --> 17:42.200
and I think that's a good point
17:42.200 --> 17:45.200
and I think that's a good point
17:45.200 --> 17:48.200
and I think that's a good point
17:48.200 --> 17:51.200
and I think that's a good point
17:51.200 --> 17:54.200
and I think that's a good point
17:54.200 --> 17:57.200
and I think that's a good point
17:57.200 --> 18:00.200
and I think that's a good point
18:00.200 --> 18:03.200
and I think that's a good point
18:03.200 --> 18:06.200
and I think that's a good point
18:06.200 --> 18:09.200
and I think that's a good point
18:09.200 --> 18:12.200
and I think that's a good point
18:12.200 --> 18:15.200
and I think that's a good point
18:15.200 --> 18:18.200
and I think that's a good point
18:18.200 --> 18:21.200
and I think that's a good point
18:21.200 --> 18:24.200
and I think that's a good point
18:24.200 --> 18:27.200
and I think that's a good point
18:27.200 --> 18:30.200
and I think that's a good point
18:30.200 --> 18:33.200
and I think that's a good point
18:33.200 --> 18:36.200
and I think that's a good point
18:36.200 --> 18:39.200
and I think that's a good point
18:39.200 --> 18:42.200
and I think that's a good point
18:42.200 --> 18:45.200
and I think that's a good point
18:45.200 --> 18:48.200
and I think that's a good point
18:48.200 --> 18:51.200
and I think that's a good point
18:51.200 --> 18:54.200
and I think that's a good point
18:54.200 --> 18:57.200
and I think that's a good point
18:57.200 --> 19:00.200
and I think that's a good point
19:00.200 --> 19:03.200
and I think that's a good point
19:03.200 --> 19:06.200
and I think that's a good point
19:06.200 --> 19:09.200
and I think that's a good point
19:09.200 --> 19:12.200
and I think that's a good point
19:12.200 --> 19:15.200
and I think that's a good point
19:15.200 --> 19:18.200
and I think that's a good point
19:18.200 --> 19:21.200
and I think that's a good point
19:21.200 --> 19:24.200
and I think that's a good point
19:24.200 --> 19:27.200
and I think that's a good point
19:27.200 --> 19:30.200
and I think that's a good point
19:30.200 --> 19:33.200
and I think that's a good point
19:33.200 --> 19:36.200
and I think that's a good point
19:36.200 --> 19:39.200
and I think that's a good point
19:39.200 --> 19:42.200
and I think that's a good point
19:42.200 --> 19:45.200
and I think that's a good point
19:45.200 --> 19:48.200
and I think that's a good point
19:48.200 --> 19:51.200
and I think that's a good point
19:51.200 --> 19:55.200
He's been around the world when he said he discovered evidence of alien life.
19:55.200 --> 19:59.200
His claim was based on fossil remains he supposedly found in a meteorite.
19:59.200 --> 20:04.200
The next day, however, NASA said their researchers' work was flawed and unreliable.
20:04.200 --> 20:08.200
However, claims of alien life and fossils are nothing new for NASA.
20:08.200 --> 20:12.200
For the past seven years, they've been dealing with a Winsboro man and his research.
20:12.200 --> 20:16.200
And his work may very well change our way of thinking forever.
20:21.200 --> 20:24.200
Music
20:24.200 --> 20:27.200
Music
20:27.200 --> 20:30.200
Music
20:30.200 --> 20:33.200
Music
20:33.200 --> 20:36.200
Music
20:36.200 --> 20:40.200
Ever since the Viking probe landed on Mars in 1976,
20:40.200 --> 20:44.200
NASA has been trying to find out if life once existed
20:44.200 --> 20:47.200
or if it still exists there today.
20:47.200 --> 20:50.200
30 years later, in December of 2006,
20:50.200 --> 20:55.200
Today you will hear what many are saying may be the most significant discoveries to date.
20:55.200 --> 21:00.200
NASA scientists released photographs that suggest there is life.
21:00.200 --> 21:03.200
Pictures that show water on Mars.
21:03.200 --> 21:07.200
We can honestly talk about liquid water on the surface of Mars today.
21:07.200 --> 21:12.200
The news was reported in the national media and was hailed as a major discovery.
21:12.200 --> 21:18.200
The only problem, another man says he made the very same discovery nearly three years earlier.
21:18.200 --> 21:23.200
You came to the conclusion that there was water and life on Mars when?
21:23.200 --> 21:27.200
The date when I was first certain of it was February 15, 2004.
21:27.200 --> 21:32.200
Charles Schulz looks and sounds like a modern-day Einstein.
21:32.200 --> 21:38.200
Using the Freedom of Information Act, he obtained more than 200,000 Mars images from NASA.
21:38.200 --> 21:43.200
And after thousands of hours of research, he came to some startling conclusions.
21:43.200 --> 21:48.200
Many of the things that I've seen look very clearly like the recent erosion or presence of water,
21:48.200 --> 21:55.200
liquid water on the surface, and many of the images show what appear to be fossil organisms, marine fossils.
21:55.200 --> 21:59.200
Right, fossils on Mars, and not just a few.
21:59.200 --> 22:02.200
Schulz says the planet is littered with them.
22:02.200 --> 22:06.200
Right now the planet has extremely thin air, very tough living conditions,
22:06.200 --> 22:12.200
but it is wet on the surface in many areas and it is covered with fossil remains from marine organisms.
22:12.200 --> 22:18.200
Some of the fossils we found are seashells, and very clearly they are identical to the things we'd find on the Earth.
22:18.200 --> 22:22.200
This is a conch shell apparently found on the planet Mars, and this is one on the Earth.
22:22.200 --> 22:26.200
And you can see there's an absolute identical appearance to both of them.
22:26.200 --> 22:29.200
Schulz shelled me picture after picture.
22:29.200 --> 22:30.200
This is a trilobite fossil.
22:30.200 --> 22:32.200
All NASA images.
22:32.200 --> 22:36.200
This is Opportunity, the rover found on the 158th day of its imaging.
22:36.200 --> 22:38.200
And all of them compelling.
22:38.200 --> 22:43.200
This clearly looks like water flow to me and mud.
22:43.200 --> 22:44.200
It is.
22:44.200 --> 22:51.200
The rover, the Opportunity, these Mars crafts that have gone up there and literally have gotten stuck.
22:51.200 --> 22:52.200
Stuck in the mud?
22:52.200 --> 22:54.200
In many cases, yes.
22:54.200 --> 22:58.200
Schulz's research has the potential to change the way we think about the universe.
22:58.200 --> 23:03.200
He's written numerous articles for scientific magazines and books on the subject.
23:03.200 --> 23:06.200
The latest is a fossil hunter's guide to Mars.
23:06.200 --> 23:11.200
In it, he carefully lays out his research and conclusions.
23:11.200 --> 23:13.200
NASA explained your findings.
23:13.200 --> 23:15.200
Actually, they've ignored it.
23:15.200 --> 23:21.200
In the beginning when I began posting a lot of my information and sending it to them as well, there was some interest.
23:21.200 --> 23:28.200
And my website had hits from 40 to 90% from Mars researchers, NASA particularly, and other.
23:28.200 --> 23:32.200
But over time, the news died off and there was no response.
23:32.200 --> 23:35.200
So they actually pretty much ignored what I posted.
23:35.200 --> 23:46.200
NASA director Charlie Bolden won't speculate on the potential for water or fossils on Mars, but he's hoping the next rover mission, Curiosity, will answer those questions once and for all.
23:46.200 --> 23:48.200
It takes off this November.
23:48.200 --> 23:52.200
The first data is expected by the fall of next year.
23:52.200 --> 23:55.200
We expect to make discoveries with Curiosity.
23:55.200 --> 23:58.200
I don't want to set great expectations.
23:58.200 --> 24:01.200
What we find will be different from what we found before.
24:01.200 --> 24:03.200
It will look at the soil of Mars.
24:03.200 --> 24:07.200
It's looking for any signs of microbes or microbial life there.
24:07.200 --> 24:10.200
It's absolutely incredible what it's going to do.
24:10.200 --> 24:14.200
And when I pressed him on Schulz's claims of fossils on Mars...
24:14.200 --> 24:15.200
I don't know.
24:15.200 --> 24:19.200
I wish I could say yes, I do, but I don't know. I really don't.
24:19.200 --> 24:24.200
Bolden referred me to a NASA scientist who's been working on the very same subject.
24:24.200 --> 24:35.200
This activity, especially the fact that it's going on today, to me says that the mid-latitudes of Mars are one of the more remarkable places in the solar system.
24:35.200 --> 24:38.200
Phil Christensen is well known for his work on Mars.
24:38.200 --> 24:41.200
Remember that December 06 announcement of water on Mars?
24:41.200 --> 24:46.200
Well, Christensen was there, and NASA's conclusions were supported by his research.
24:46.200 --> 24:52.200
NASA's goal, long-term goal, is to land on Mars, collect rocks, and bring them back to Earth...
24:52.200 --> 25:02.200
so that we can examine them in laboratories here under microscopes and look for any evidence of fossils or any other evidence of ancient life on Mars.
25:02.200 --> 25:08.200
I'm very confident that that rover will make discoveries that will really change our thinking.
25:08.200 --> 25:11.200
Again, every time we look, we find an interesting place.
25:11.200 --> 25:21.200
There were clearly environments on Mars billions of years ago that were very much like the Earth, and it's very possible that life may have started there.
25:21.200 --> 25:26.200
Again, that would be a fantastic discovery, and that could be coming in the next year or so.
25:26.200 --> 25:29.200
I think that they have been ready with this for a very long time.
25:30.200 --> 25:38.200
The first researchers on the rover teams included an oceanographer, a marine biologist, who was looking at the images.
25:38.200 --> 25:40.200
And that's very telling in its own right.
25:40.200 --> 25:46.200
Schulz believes disclosure will happen next year once the rover sends images back to Earth.
25:46.200 --> 25:50.200
It's something he says could have happened sooner, but didn't because of religious beliefs.
25:50.200 --> 25:54.200
Many people allow their beliefs to dominate regardless of the facts.
25:54.200 --> 25:56.200
And it's not a stab at religion.
25:56.200 --> 25:58.200
This is just a presentation of the facts.
25:58.200 --> 26:01.200
People who have faith find a way to live with the facts.
26:01.200 --> 26:03.200
You're dealing with science.
26:03.200 --> 26:04.200
That's absolutely correct.
26:04.200 --> 26:06.200
You have to work with science and facts.
26:06.200 --> 26:08.200
Is there life on Mars right now?
26:08.200 --> 26:12.200
I do believe so because nothing we know of would have sterilized the entire planet.
26:12.200 --> 26:17.200
Funguses, spores, bacteria could very easily still be in the soil today.
26:17.200 --> 26:22.200
Well, despite his research, Schulz says he's not the person who first discovered life on Mars.
26:23.200 --> 26:30.200
He said that honor belongs to Viking mission scientist and current Arizona State University professor Dr. Gary Levin.
26:30.200 --> 26:37.200
Levin believes he discovered microbial life from the soil samples taken from the two Viking missions from the 1970s.
26:37.200 --> 26:41.200
But NASA has never embraced those findings.
26:41.200 --> 26:43.200
Well, a huge announcement from NASA today.
26:43.200 --> 26:47.200
Their scientists believe water is flowing on the surface of Mars.
26:47.200 --> 26:52.200
And it's believed to be salt water, which could still theoretically sustain life.
26:52.200 --> 26:59.200
NASA says striking new images from the mountains of Mars may be their best evidence yet of flowing liquid water.
26:59.200 --> 27:03.200
Those images appear to show some sort of water flow on the Mars surface.
27:03.200 --> 27:10.200
Now, if true, NASA says this has profound implications in the search for extraterrestrial life.
27:10.200 --> 27:14.200
But today's NASA announcement is nothing new for a Winsboro man.
27:14.200 --> 27:17.200
Charles Schulz has been studying the so-called red planet for years.
27:17.200 --> 27:23.200
And back in April, he told News 19 viewers that there's microbial life and water on Mars.
27:23.200 --> 27:29.200
He believes NASA has known this for years and is releasing the information a little at a time.
27:29.200 --> 27:35.200
Little by little, the information is being given to the public to sort of prepare them for what's to come.
27:35.200 --> 27:39.200
The flow of water and the creation of mud is very common on the planet Mars, even today.
27:39.200 --> 27:41.200
And this mud flow is terraced.
27:42.200 --> 27:45.200
It's in layers, just as you'd expect in any place where the water's flowing.
27:45.200 --> 27:47.200
You can see how it's moved around here.
27:47.200 --> 27:50.200
And this is actually the geyser that probably was the source of that water.
27:50.200 --> 27:54.200
For 45 years, we believed Mars to be as dry as the moon.
27:54.200 --> 27:57.200
And yet constantly we're given information that tells us that's not so.
27:57.200 --> 28:00.200
It's loaded with water and mineral resources.
28:00.200 --> 28:02.200
It's another planet just like the Earth.
28:02.200 --> 28:09.200
If you remember our story back in April, Charles tried to give NASA his findings, and they basically wouldn't listen to him.
28:11.200 --> 28:13.200
So hopefully you're seeing a pattern here.
28:13.200 --> 28:15.200
And the pattern goes on.
28:15.200 --> 28:20.200
Well, other amateur researchers, for example, have spotted other fossils of what appear to be fossils.
28:20.200 --> 28:25.200
The picture on the lower half of this slide here is from Earth.
28:25.200 --> 28:32.200
It's the spine of, let's see, some fossilized dinosaur, fossilized reptilian spine.
28:32.200 --> 28:35.200
And I've got the link at the bottom there.
28:35.200 --> 28:41.200
On the top, that top image is from Curiosity, sorry, from Curiosity rover.
28:41.200 --> 28:45.200
And you can see these pieces, particularly here, they're not like pieces of rock.
28:45.200 --> 28:49.200
You don't get pieces of rock that do that and stand up in the soil.
28:49.200 --> 28:55.200
So there's a lot of evidence of fossilized life forms in the pictures that have come back from Mars.
28:55.200 --> 29:02.200
If indeed, as some people have suggested to me, the rovers are in fact on Mars.
29:02.200 --> 29:06.200
Some people, of course, I talk about the Apollo missions being hosted as well.
29:06.200 --> 29:07.200
I've got other people about that.
29:07.200 --> 29:11.200
Mark Simon, of course, will be giving his take on that later on today.
29:11.200 --> 29:16.200
So if they fake the Apollo missions, which I think they did, to a large extent, not completely,
29:16.200 --> 29:18.200
then why not fake the rovers?
29:18.200 --> 29:19.200
It's a possibility.
29:19.200 --> 29:22.200
I do happen to think they are on Mars, but...
29:22.200 --> 29:25.200
Okay, so that's just some side by side information.
29:27.200 --> 29:31.200
But yeah, I've come back from the live thing, but yeah.
29:31.200 --> 29:36.200
I've got a clip here from some Godless Climber giving me, and this is from the Daily Mail,
29:36.200 --> 29:40.200
21st of September, 2013, one week ago.
29:40.200 --> 29:43.200
The headline is, Life on Mars? Question that.
29:43.200 --> 29:46.200
No, says NASA. No.
29:49.200 --> 29:53.200
Now, people probably know this fellow, very interesting chap.
29:53.200 --> 29:55.200
He's been linked to all kinds of things.
29:55.200 --> 30:00.200
I believe he had certain court knowledge that most of us are not party to.
30:00.200 --> 30:04.200
He spoke out in 2001 when the Mars Global Surveyor images came out.
30:04.200 --> 30:08.200
He was speaking about these images, which he thought were trees.
30:08.200 --> 30:11.200
And again, you can go onto the NASA website, or the USGS website,
30:11.200 --> 30:14.200
and you can download these images for yourself and look at what these are.
30:14.200 --> 30:16.200
These don't look like rocks or dunes.
30:16.200 --> 30:20.200
These seem to have some kind of tree-like or fungal structure or something,
30:20.200 --> 30:22.200
of course, on a much larger scale.
30:22.200 --> 30:26.200
These look like banyan trees, according to Arthur C. Clarke.
30:26.200 --> 30:31.200
But James Rice, a planetary geologist at Arizona State University said,
30:31.200 --> 30:36.200
Most of the images in question that I looked at are of dunes in the polar regions.
30:36.200 --> 30:38.200
He says, most of the images.
30:38.200 --> 30:41.200
They are beginning to defrost as winter draws to a close.
30:41.200 --> 30:44.200
The sand is composing the dunes is dark and the frost is bright,
30:44.200 --> 30:47.200
thereby causing the spotted pattern as the dune defrosts.
30:47.200 --> 30:52.200
This is not vegetation, but rather the natural defrosting of dunes and sand sheets.
30:52.200 --> 30:56.200
Oh, really? Well, thank you for that very expert explanation.
30:56.200 --> 31:00.200
Of course, we plugs have to bow to your superior mothers.
31:01.200 --> 31:04.200
Now then, another interesting image that I came across on the website,
31:04.200 --> 31:06.200
and I've got a comparison for you now.
31:06.200 --> 31:09.200
This is from the Mars Express probe from the high-rise,
31:09.200 --> 31:12.200
not the high-rise, perhaps on the Mars Constitutum, is that?
31:12.200 --> 31:16.200
This is from the high-resolution camera on the Mars Express probe,
31:16.200 --> 31:18.200
that went to be in 2003.
31:18.200 --> 31:23.200
And on the right, we have Calgoole Goldmine in Australia.
31:23.200 --> 31:26.200
Anyone seen any Stenitis today at all?
31:26.200 --> 31:28.200
Or is it just me?
31:28.200 --> 31:31.200
Another interesting structure I came across, quite a few years ago,
31:31.200 --> 31:34.200
almost ten years ago, I came across this on the website,
31:34.200 --> 31:38.200
and verified that, yes indeed, this does appear in our pictures.
31:38.200 --> 31:42.200
Excuse me, it's three miles long from, as I've marked there,
31:42.200 --> 31:45.200
three miles, straight line.
31:45.200 --> 31:47.200
What is it? I don't know what it is.
31:47.200 --> 31:50.200
Geologists won't talk about this.
31:50.200 --> 31:53.200
Now, this is my favorite.
31:53.200 --> 31:57.200
This is from M1501228, a Mars Global Subair image,
31:57.200 --> 32:00.200
which I think was taken in 1998.
32:00.200 --> 32:03.200
I measured the size of it, it's within the crater.
32:03.200 --> 32:07.200
You can see this tube going up the top there.
32:07.200 --> 32:10.200
I think it's a G-d, as you've heard me,
32:10.200 --> 32:12.200
but I don't know anything, I'm just black,
32:12.200 --> 32:14.200
so you're not allowed to agree,
32:14.200 --> 32:17.200
because I don't have a degree in planetary science.
32:17.200 --> 32:19.200
And somebody on there, I don't know,
32:19.200 --> 32:23.200
posted a link to this comparison, which looks quite interesting.
32:23.200 --> 32:27.200
This is the geodesic element, the murder station at the South Pole,
32:27.200 --> 32:30.200
and then we've got the, there we are.
32:30.200 --> 32:32.200
No one will discuss the image.
32:32.200 --> 32:34.200
A lot of people talk about Cyanian stuff,
32:34.200 --> 32:36.200
more geometric ratio, so to speak.
32:36.200 --> 32:38.200
Hardly anybody talks about this.
32:38.200 --> 32:41.200
I think I discovered it on Jason Martell's website.
32:41.200 --> 32:44.200
And a little bit further down, we have this structure.
32:44.200 --> 32:47.200
This is, well, I don't know if you've seen it,
32:47.200 --> 32:49.200
but this is the structure.
32:49.200 --> 32:52.200
This is, well, that length there is 1.3 miles.
32:52.200 --> 32:54.200
What the hell are these ribs here?
32:54.200 --> 32:55.200
What the hell is this?
32:55.200 --> 32:57.200
Natural rock formation?
32:57.200 --> 32:59.200
Really? How's it formed?
32:59.200 --> 33:01.200
Could be natural, I don't know.
33:01.200 --> 33:03.200
But it's sure as hell weird.
33:03.200 --> 33:06.200
Now, that whole area where there's two objects are,
33:06.200 --> 33:09.200
the dome and the funny spiny object,
33:09.200 --> 33:12.200
whatever it is in the caterpillar, as I've come to call it,
33:12.200 --> 33:14.200
it's in the whole region, one strip, it's hollow,
33:14.200 --> 33:16.200
and it's a giant video.
34:44.200 --> 35:12.200
MUSIC
35:12.200 --> 35:15.200
So that data is all publicly available for you to explore.
35:15.200 --> 35:16.200
Most of it is.
35:16.200 --> 35:19.200
Now, I learned that what the Mars Global Survey had,
35:19.200 --> 35:21.200
they had what's called a radar altimeter,
35:21.200 --> 35:26.200
MOA, Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter and Range Rover, I guess.
35:26.200 --> 35:29.200
And if you go and try and access the altitude data
35:29.200 --> 35:32.200
for that whole strip, you can't access it.
35:32.200 --> 35:34.200
It's the only strip that's not publicly available
35:34.200 --> 35:36.200
to the peer review department.
35:36.200 --> 35:39.200
You can see all those images on two different websites.
35:40.200 --> 35:46.200
I've got details about that image in an article I wrote in 2005.
35:46.200 --> 35:48.200
I've got a book that's written in here.
35:48.200 --> 35:50.200
It's on my website, so all that information is there
35:50.200 --> 35:52.200
for you to go and explore in your own time.
35:52.200 --> 35:55.200
But yes, I discovered that accident again.
35:55.200 --> 35:57.200
So I didn't follow this very closely.
35:57.200 --> 36:00.200
I tend not to watch the news because I hate it.
36:00.200 --> 36:02.200
So I miss out when the new discoveries come out,
36:02.200 --> 36:04.200
and I tend to find it a bit late.
36:04.200 --> 36:07.200
So I found that this dome, or whatever it is,
36:07.200 --> 36:10.200
was re-imaged in 2008 with another new probe
36:10.200 --> 36:13.200
with Marge Econos and Thorbetton in the high-rise camera.
36:13.200 --> 36:16.200
And you could find this image at that time
36:16.200 --> 36:19.200
on the University of Arizona website.
36:19.200 --> 36:22.200
So, you know, it's all publicly available.
36:22.200 --> 36:26.200
And I use this image here as my sky avatar,
36:26.200 --> 36:30.200
you know, my various avatars and forums I've posted on this,
36:30.200 --> 36:31.200
but like that.
36:31.200 --> 36:33.200
Notice the description.
36:33.200 --> 36:36.200
This is the University of Arizona's description here.
36:36.200 --> 36:37.200
Sorry.
36:37.200 --> 36:42.200
Created with textured mound in central Assyria-Plamydia.
36:42.200 --> 36:44.200
Well, that's a little bit of a description,
36:44.200 --> 36:46.200
but not very exciting.
36:46.200 --> 36:48.200
And so, yes, I was telling my brother about this
36:48.200 --> 36:49.200
because he looked at it.
36:49.200 --> 36:50.200
I was filming it on Skype.
36:50.200 --> 36:52.200
I said, Andre, what's this image you've got on Skype?
36:52.200 --> 36:53.200
What the hell is it?
36:53.200 --> 36:54.200
He said, oh, that's on Mars.
36:54.200 --> 36:55.200
That's going on, going on.
36:55.200 --> 36:58.200
I gave him the link to this website.
36:58.200 --> 37:01.200
And this is what I'd previously seen when I looked at it.
37:01.200 --> 37:04.200
Then, in 2009, I think, more than 2010,
37:04.200 --> 37:07.200
I was filming my brother.
37:07.200 --> 37:08.200
I kept giving him the link.
37:08.200 --> 37:13.200
And notice, look, it says,
37:13.200 --> 37:15.200
Created with textured mound.
37:15.200 --> 37:17.200
The caption is exactly the same.
37:17.200 --> 37:18.200
What?
37:18.200 --> 37:19.200
Where?
37:19.200 --> 37:20.200
Where's the Created with textured mound?
37:20.200 --> 37:21.200
Sorry.
37:21.200 --> 37:23.200
Now, if you go to the links down here,
37:23.200 --> 37:24.200
sure enough, you could download that image,
37:24.200 --> 37:26.200
the bluecast that I showed you.
37:26.200 --> 37:30.200
Yeah, that image is there, but it's not on the headline.
37:30.200 --> 37:32.200
Anyone say cover up?
37:32.200 --> 37:34.200
No, no, no, it's not that.
37:34.200 --> 37:36.200
We decided it wasn't very interesting after all.
37:36.200 --> 37:37.200
It's very long.
37:37.200 --> 37:38.200
It's a very long ice.
37:38.200 --> 37:39.200
It is, isn't it?
37:39.200 --> 37:42.200
Now, so this is the high resolution version again,
37:42.200 --> 37:44.200
close up, and you can see that it looks like it's,
37:44.200 --> 37:46.200
you know, admittedly, when you look close to it,
37:46.200 --> 37:49.200
it looks less like a geodesic dome.
37:49.200 --> 37:51.200
It looks like you've got some crystalline formation
37:51.200 --> 37:53.200
or something, because these are about seven times
37:53.200 --> 37:55.200
the resolution of the previous one.
37:55.200 --> 37:57.200
But you can still see this linear sort of tube effect
37:57.200 --> 37:59.200
going up into the crater.
37:59.200 --> 38:01.200
It's still circuiting, it's slap bang in the middle of the crater.
38:01.200 --> 38:03.200
None of that has changed.
38:03.200 --> 38:05.200
That to me is one of the most extraordinary
38:05.200 --> 38:07.200
and arresting images in the solar system,
38:07.200 --> 38:09.200
and I've never heard anyone talking about it.
38:09.200 --> 38:13.200
Yet it is publicly available, if you go and look for it.
38:13.200 --> 38:15.200
Just another close up.
38:15.200 --> 38:18.200
And this is this caterpillar object again,
38:18.200 --> 38:20.200
which again, you can just see more detail.
38:20.200 --> 38:22.200
They've got these regularly spaced plates.
38:22.200 --> 38:24.200
No explanation, I've not found any official explanation
38:24.200 --> 38:27.200
as to what this is.
38:27.200 --> 38:29.200
Close up again.
38:29.200 --> 38:31.200
Various structures there, but I don't know what they are.
38:31.200 --> 38:33.200
That's all on that image strip.
38:33.200 --> 38:35.200
Q. Are they trying to put you down to win that low share on that?
38:35.200 --> 38:37.200
Yeah, I think they'll generally say it's wind erosion
38:37.200 --> 38:39.200
or possibly water erosion,
38:39.200 --> 38:43.200
but they'll just hand-wave it away, you know, in what they do.
38:43.200 --> 38:45.200
So what do scientists say about some of these?
38:45.200 --> 38:47.200
Well, I haven't sent the new images to geologists,
38:47.200 --> 38:50.200
but back in 2004 when I discovered this one on the left here
38:50.200 --> 38:52.200
and this one on the right,
38:52.200 --> 38:55.200
I sent those images, just those two little images,
38:55.200 --> 38:57.200
without any reference, no description.
38:57.200 --> 39:00.200
I sent them to 42 geologists picked at random
39:00.200 --> 39:02.200
from university websites, emailed them.
39:02.200 --> 39:05.200
I said, you know, what are they?
39:05.200 --> 39:07.200
And they kept telling me it was longitudinal dunes
39:07.200 --> 39:09.200
and all kinds of things.
39:09.200 --> 39:11.200
They wouldn't tell me how it had formed.
39:11.200 --> 39:13.200
No one could say how those things had formed.
39:13.200 --> 39:16.200
But what interested me was I sent these two images,
39:16.200 --> 39:19.200
and I apologize for an unsolicited email and so on
39:19.200 --> 39:21.200
because people get a lot of spam.
39:21.200 --> 39:24.200
And then one guy, I forget which university was it,
39:24.200 --> 39:27.200
an associate professor of geology, he responded to me and said,
39:27.200 --> 39:29.200
initially he asked where the images were from,
39:29.200 --> 39:31.200
and I told him, you know, I gave him the links
39:31.200 --> 39:35.200
to the USGS website, USGS, US Geological Survey.
39:35.200 --> 39:37.200
I gave him the links to that site. No other.
39:37.200 --> 39:41.200
He responded, these two images from the surface of Mars
39:41.200 --> 39:43.200
are certainly puzzling and have been floating
39:43.200 --> 39:45.200
around UFO web pages for some time.
39:45.200 --> 39:46.200
Huh?
39:46.200 --> 39:49.200
I am sorry, but I do not believe in big conspiracy theories
39:49.200 --> 39:51.200
and that the government is trying to hide something from us
39:51.200 --> 39:54.200
concerning Mars or any other planet.
39:54.200 --> 39:56.200
That wasn't what I asked him.
39:56.200 --> 39:58.200
That wasn't what I asked him, and I sent him links
39:58.200 --> 40:01.200
to the USGS website, not to any UFO website.
40:01.200 --> 40:03.200
I said, I don't care what's on those.
40:03.200 --> 40:06.200
These are government-funded websites.
40:06.200 --> 40:09.200
This is the attitude you get in the academic community.
40:09.200 --> 40:15.200
It's career suicide to discuss these with any real honesty.
40:15.200 --> 40:17.200
Any re-arbitration?
40:17.200 --> 40:18.200
Yeah, exactly.
40:18.200 --> 40:20.200
Now, I'll just make a quick reference,
40:20.200 --> 40:23.200
hopefully to link it to Marcus Allen's presentation.
40:23.200 --> 40:25.200
I did a bit of Photoshopping here,
40:25.200 --> 40:27.200
because NASA does this all the time,
40:27.200 --> 40:30.200
as we can find out for ourselves if you look long enough.
40:30.200 --> 40:33.200
Now, we've got this famous story about Alan Shepard
40:33.200 --> 40:37.200
playing golf on the moon, and it went for miles and miles
40:37.200 --> 40:39.200
when he hit it, and you can look up this story.
40:39.200 --> 40:42.200
Apollo 14 it was.
40:42.200 --> 40:44.200
You know, another man not to walk on the moon.
40:44.200 --> 40:47.200
Well, I'm wondering if that's where it ended up.
40:47.200 --> 40:51.200
And I do just have to thank Neil Austin for this joke.
40:51.200 --> 40:54.200
I reworked the image, but I got this from Neil Austin.
40:54.200 --> 40:56.200
Anyway, there you go.
40:56.200 --> 41:00.200
But the Freemasons, they do love their golf, don't they?
41:00.200 --> 41:03.200
Now, this, and this is David Percy's.
41:03.200 --> 41:05.200
I think it was David Percy that discovered this.
41:05.200 --> 41:07.200
I just sort of redid the image. I haven't discovered this.
41:07.200 --> 41:10.200
I don't claim any credit for this whatsoever.
41:10.200 --> 41:14.200
To me, David Percy's written a book about this called Two-Thirds.
41:14.200 --> 41:16.200
I haven't read it. I haven't read into this,
41:16.200 --> 41:19.200
but I'm just purely showing you this image, right,
41:19.200 --> 41:21.200
and how I did it.
41:21.200 --> 41:23.200
I got an image of Cydonia, which was from Viking.
41:23.200 --> 41:26.200
I took that, I think, off all this website,
41:26.200 --> 41:29.200
which is in turn taken off a NASA website.
41:29.200 --> 41:32.200
I got an image from Google Maps, saved it onto my computer.
41:32.200 --> 41:35.200
I resized it, such that it overlapped.
41:35.200 --> 41:40.200
And, well, I think that image speaks for itself, doesn't it?
41:40.200 --> 41:42.200
I've shown this image before.
41:42.200 --> 41:44.200
I showed it last year or the year before.
41:44.200 --> 41:48.200
It's such a... I mean, we've got three significant geological features
41:48.200 --> 41:50.200
in precise correspondence.
41:50.200 --> 41:55.200
We've got, like, some type of mound here corresponding here,
41:55.200 --> 41:58.200
and we've got, obviously, the stone circle at Avery
41:58.200 --> 42:00.200
and Silbury Hill here.
42:00.200 --> 42:02.200
The scale is 14 to 1.
42:02.200 --> 42:05.200
What is one mile on the Earth is 14 miles on Mars.
42:05.200 --> 42:08.200
I contend that there is a story here that somebody knows about
42:08.200 --> 42:10.200
that we're not being told.
42:10.200 --> 42:13.200
I don't know what that story is, but there is a story.
42:13.200 --> 42:16.200
Right, two-thirds. It's in the book, yeah.
42:16.200 --> 42:18.200
I did mention the book.
42:18.200 --> 42:20.200
Right, thank you.
42:20.200 --> 42:24.200
Oh, yeah, and so this is also a bit of humor, really,
42:24.200 --> 42:27.200
because I do get hits, as Sir Charles Shortz was saying,
42:27.200 --> 42:31.200
I get hits on my website from, you know, NASA and so forth.
42:31.200 --> 42:35.200
And they actually came to my website,
42:35.200 --> 42:38.200
and this was a few years ago, 2008,
42:38.200 --> 42:42.200
and they Googled for News Life on Mars.
42:42.200 --> 42:44.200
And they ended up on my website,
42:44.200 --> 42:46.200
somebody from Borough, Derbyshire,
42:46.200 --> 42:49.200
from NASA looking at my website for news about life on Mars.
42:49.200 --> 42:51.200
Is that funny or what?
42:51.200 --> 42:54.200
And they did it again.
42:54.200 --> 42:57.200
This is, Marshall Space Flight Center came to my website,
42:57.200 --> 43:02.200
and they clicked on that image of the T from my website.
43:02.200 --> 43:04.200
It's crazy stuff.
43:04.200 --> 43:07.200
I mean, a bit like Charles Shortz was saying in his fossil video,
43:07.200 --> 43:09.200
a lot of his hits were from NASA.
43:09.200 --> 43:11.200
Okay, and there's other anomalies as well.
43:11.200 --> 43:14.200
This is another one from Opportunity, I think, this image.
43:14.200 --> 43:16.200
And this is a panorama,
43:16.200 --> 43:18.200
which again, I've got the image reference at the bottom.
43:18.200 --> 43:20.200
But nice, you know, it's a nice black and white view,
43:20.200 --> 43:22.200
just what you want with all these expensive imaging systems.
43:22.200 --> 43:24.200
Still black and white, you know.
43:24.200 --> 43:27.200
You can just make do with that because of your plebs.
43:27.200 --> 43:29.200
What the hell is this?
43:32.200 --> 43:35.200
That is in a NASA image.
43:35.200 --> 43:37.200
You can download that.
43:37.200 --> 43:39.200
Yep.
43:39.200 --> 43:42.200
And again, we've done the water and mud.
43:44.200 --> 43:46.200
I've done the water before, which was reported.
43:46.200 --> 43:49.200
Scientists are intrigued by the marks on Spirits Airbags left on the surface.
43:49.200 --> 43:51.200
This is BBC News website.
43:51.200 --> 43:53.200
The soil shows an unusual caziness,
43:53.200 --> 43:56.200
almost as if the soil grains were stuck together like mud.
43:56.200 --> 43:59.200
The way in which the surface is responded is bizarre.
43:59.200 --> 44:01.200
It looks like mud, but it can't be mud.
44:01.200 --> 44:03.200
But it can't be mud.
44:04.200 --> 44:06.200
Oh, look!
44:06.200 --> 44:09.200
They reported water on Mars in 1979.
44:09.200 --> 44:12.200
That's 34 years ago.
44:12.200 --> 44:15.200
It was reported from the Viking lander.
44:15.200 --> 44:17.200
This is their capture.
44:17.200 --> 44:19.200
It's still on their website. It's still there.
44:19.200 --> 44:22.200
This colour image shows a thin layer of water-eye frost on Mars.
44:22.200 --> 44:24.200
That's their image.
44:24.200 --> 44:27.200
And of course, that's the corrected image from Holger Isenberg.
44:27.200 --> 44:29.200
That's what it should look like.
44:29.200 --> 44:31.200
Same, we've done all this.
44:31.200 --> 44:33.200
This is in the Charles Shultz video.
44:33.200 --> 44:36.200
More evidence from his pictures that he's picked up.
44:36.200 --> 44:38.200
Oh, look!
44:38.200 --> 44:41.200
Mars water discovered again.
44:41.200 --> 44:43.200
This was 7th of September.
44:43.200 --> 44:45.200
I discovered this. Somebody posted it on my Facebook yesterday,
44:45.200 --> 44:47.200
so I bunged it in here.
44:47.200 --> 44:49.200
CBS.
44:49.200 --> 44:51.200
Greatest title for a news service. CBS.
44:51.200 --> 44:54.200
Greatest title for a TV news service, eh?
44:54.200 --> 44:56.200
CBS. Get it?
44:56.200 --> 44:58.200
We don't use BS here.
44:58.200 --> 45:00.200
You know the other word, but you'll get it.
45:00.200 --> 45:02.200
So, quick summary for evidence of life on Mars.
45:02.200 --> 45:04.200
There are non-natural structures on Mars.
45:04.200 --> 45:06.200
Surface-sized water was photographed...
45:06.200 --> 45:08.200
Well, this is how old this slide is.
45:08.200 --> 45:10.200
...34 years ago.
45:10.200 --> 45:13.200
In some detail, Gilbert Levin, his experiment worked.
45:13.200 --> 45:16.200
Biomarker gases have been discovered more than once.
45:16.200 --> 45:18.200
Et cetera, et cetera.
45:18.200 --> 45:21.200
Recent rover pictures, so soil moisture.
45:21.200 --> 45:25.200
Yeah, and they don't really discuss these discoveries in any great detail.
45:25.200 --> 45:27.200
They'll announce it and then debunk it.
45:27.200 --> 45:29.200
So that it's a control...
45:29.200 --> 45:32.200
Perception management has been heavily in operation.
45:32.200 --> 45:35.200
So we're going to move away from Mars now, but not far,
45:35.200 --> 45:37.200
to the moon Phobos,
45:37.200 --> 45:40.200
where there's been some interesting information about that,
45:40.200 --> 45:43.200
and the con man Buzz Aldrin has recently got involved in that as well.
45:45.200 --> 45:48.200
So Phobos, what is it, for those that are not familiar?
45:48.200 --> 45:51.200
Phobos, the unit and larger of Mars' two moons.
45:51.200 --> 45:54.200
It was discovered telescopically with its companion moon,
45:54.200 --> 45:58.200
Deimos, by the American astronomer Asaph Hall in 1877.
45:58.200 --> 46:00.200
So it's really not that long ago,
46:00.200 --> 46:02.200
considering how long ago some of the moons of Saturn
46:02.200 --> 46:06.200
were discovered, like in the 18th century rather than the 19th.
46:06.200 --> 46:11.200
It's roughly a little body, 16.5 miles across at its widest point,
46:11.200 --> 46:15.200
and it revolves around Mars every 7 hours, 39 minutes,
46:15.200 --> 46:18.200
and it's only 9,000 kilometres away.
46:18.200 --> 46:23.200
It's very unusual for a satellite to be that close at that distance.
46:23.200 --> 46:27.200
And what are these strange lines? Richard Hoagland has talked about these.
46:27.200 --> 46:30.200
I've stolen a few more of his pictures later on,
46:30.200 --> 46:32.200
which I'll mention as well.
46:32.200 --> 46:34.200
These intersect at right angles.
46:34.200 --> 46:37.200
If you get a close-up of these, I haven't really enlarged it on this side,
46:37.200 --> 46:40.200
and you've also got these strange lines on Vesta, but that's a lot bigger.
46:40.200 --> 46:43.200
This is like 526 kilometres, and that's only 26,
46:43.200 --> 46:46.200
so this is like 10 times bigger, 20 times bigger.
46:46.200 --> 46:51.200
But these lines are very strange, they're quite linear in nature,
46:52.200 --> 46:57.200
and these were only discovered from one of the probes a few years ago.
46:57.200 --> 47:00.200
But it was said many years ago, in the 60s,
47:00.200 --> 47:04.200
this Russian mathematician Slavsky calculated the orbital motion
47:04.200 --> 47:07.200
of Martian satellite Phobos and came to the jaw-dropping conclusion
47:07.200 --> 47:11.200
that the moon is artificial, hollow, and basically a titanic spaceship.
47:11.200 --> 47:14.200
He said that in 1963.
47:14.200 --> 47:17.200
This picture on the right is a little bit faint,
47:17.200 --> 47:21.200
but this is from the Curiosity Rover, this is a recent picture.
47:21.200 --> 47:24.200
This is what Phobos looks like from the surface,
47:24.200 --> 47:28.200
and they recently showed an eclipse as well taken from Opportunity.
47:28.200 --> 47:31.200
So I won't read all of that out.
47:31.200 --> 47:34.200
But a couple of people, there's another guy, let's see.
47:34.200 --> 47:37.200
Raymond H. Wilson, chief of applied mathematics at NASA,
47:37.200 --> 47:40.200
joined Slavsky and Dr. Singer in their Martian conclusions.
47:40.200 --> 47:44.200
Phobos might be a colossal base orbiting Mars, and that was in the 60s.
47:45.200 --> 47:48.200
Well, fast forward a little bit,
47:48.200 --> 47:53.200
and I was able to download this letter to the geophysical research letters,
47:53.200 --> 47:59.200
volume 37, L09202, 7th of May 2010, so we're going back about three years now.
47:59.200 --> 48:04.200
Precise mass determination and the nature of Phobos by T. P. Andert,
48:04.200 --> 48:07.200
P. Rose Blatt and those other guys.
48:07.200 --> 48:09.200
We conclude, this is in their letter,
48:09.200 --> 48:15.200
and the material of Phobos likely contains large voids, large empty spaces.
48:15.200 --> 48:20.200
When applied to various hypotheses bearing on the origin of Phobos,
48:20.200 --> 48:25.200
these results are inconsistent with the proposition that Phobos is a captured asteroid.
48:25.200 --> 48:28.200
It ain't a captured asteroid is what they're saying,
48:28.200 --> 48:32.200
because the measurements of the density and so forth don't support that.
48:32.200 --> 48:35.200
Why is it so close? Why is it nearly on the equator?
48:35.200 --> 48:39.200
Well, I'll leave you to draw your own conclusions.
48:39.200 --> 48:42.200
But again, it gets more interesting.
48:42.200 --> 48:47.200
Buzz Aldrin, Stoke's The Mystery of the Monolith on Mars.
49:05.200 --> 49:08.200
We can help. We can join with.
49:08.200 --> 49:13.200
Together we can explore the moon and develop the moon.
49:13.200 --> 49:18.200
We should go boldly where man has not gone before.
49:18.200 --> 49:23.200
Fly by the comets, visit asteroids, visit the moon of Mars.
49:23.200 --> 49:30.200
There's a monolith there, a very unusual structure on this little potato-shaped object
49:31.200 --> 49:36.200
that goes around Mars once in seven hours.
49:36.200 --> 49:40.200
When people find out about that, they're going to say, who put that there?
49:40.200 --> 49:47.200
Well, the universe put it there. If you choose, God put it there.
49:47.200 --> 49:53.200
What on earth is Buzz Aldrin on about? Why is he talking about this Phobos on Monolith?
49:53.200 --> 49:56.200
This is the guy that allegedly was the second man on the moon.
49:57.200 --> 50:01.200
Why would he put that out on the National Cable News a few years ago?
50:01.200 --> 50:06.200
In fact, when you read this Daily Mail story, which is very deeply embedded in the perception management
50:06.200 --> 50:12.200
operations going on with all these topics, which we like to explore around the UFO alien issue and 9-11 and stuff,
50:12.200 --> 50:16.200
the Daily Mail is right at the forefront of managing the psychological operation.
50:16.200 --> 50:19.200
I'll tell you that much, as it is my conclusion anyway.
50:19.200 --> 50:23.200
They messed up because there are a number of monoliths.
50:23.200 --> 50:26.200
There is one on Phobos and there is also one on the surface of Mars.
50:26.200 --> 50:31.200
What appears to be a monolith, I should be careful what I say, but that's what it appears to be.
50:31.200 --> 50:34.200
And the Daily Mail conflated the two.
50:34.200 --> 50:39.200
Now, the unusual monolith was actually imaged in 1998.
50:39.200 --> 50:44.200
So I think it was, when was this? 2009.
50:44.200 --> 50:47.200
So it's 11 years later they decided to cover it.
50:47.200 --> 50:51.200
Excuse me, why 11 years later is it brought up?
50:55.200 --> 51:01.200
And yeah, this one is on the surface, I've found where that one is, and this one is on Phobos.
51:01.200 --> 51:03.200
And I've got another little flyover video.
51:03.200 --> 51:07.200
I'm not sure about this particular one, there seems to be lots of monoliths that I've found.
51:07.200 --> 51:08.200
I'll show you this little video.
51:08.200 --> 51:11.200
So I decided to make a flyover, because again you can download an image strip,
51:11.200 --> 51:14.200
I made a one minute video here, you'll see this.
52:17.200 --> 52:43.200
And what you found there is that the camera is like at a certain angle,
52:43.200 --> 52:49.200
so the image gets sort of skewed out depending on where the probe is actually in relation to the moon.
52:49.200 --> 52:51.200
So it does get slightly distorted.
52:51.200 --> 52:55.200
So some of the images, you can't definitely say what the shape of the object is,
52:55.200 --> 52:58.200
because it has been distorted.
52:58.200 --> 53:04.200
But there does appear to be some very strange object sticking up on the surface of Phobos.
53:04.200 --> 53:08.200
Is it some kind of, I don't know, some type of ventilation shafts,
53:08.200 --> 53:12.200
a periscope of some kind, a sensor, were those little things all sensors?
53:12.200 --> 53:17.200
So, you know, taking the view that this is actually an artificial spaceship of some kind.
53:17.200 --> 53:22.200
But this is from the 2008 image from HiRISE.
53:22.200 --> 53:26.200
Not HiRISE, I keep saying HiRISE, from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter image.
53:26.200 --> 53:28.200
Yeah, it is HiRISE, sorry.
54:12.200 --> 54:35.200
So I think there's something going on on Phobos.
54:35.200 --> 54:38.200
Now there is a story which I didn't, I've got in the other DVD,
54:38.200 --> 54:45.200
I didn't have time to put it in here, about the Phobos 2 probe from Russia landing and getting shot by a missile.
54:45.200 --> 54:49.200
That story is disinformation, and that's in my other presentation.
54:49.200 --> 54:53.200
I've got to the bottom of that story.
54:53.200 --> 54:56.200
And so this was the monolith that's on the surface.
54:56.200 --> 54:58.200
And again, you can find this in a particular image.
54:58.200 --> 55:02.200
I've got all the image references at the bottom there.
55:02.200 --> 55:05.200
And this was, yeah, again, this was in the Daily Mail article.
55:05.200 --> 55:11.200
It was from HiRISE, again, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, and it was 24th of July 2008.
55:11.200 --> 55:19.200
And if you go into this area with the circle here, in fact, no, I think it's just here where it is, where this cross is actually.
55:19.200 --> 55:20.200
This is what you'll find.
55:20.200 --> 55:25.200
You'll find what looks like a triangle of three objects, you know, it may just be not.
55:25.200 --> 55:30.200
And then this thing here, if you zoom into it, it actually looks like that.
55:30.200 --> 55:32.200
Yeah, it really does look like a monolith.
55:32.200 --> 55:37.200
You know, it's oblong, it's got shadow, very strange.
55:37.200 --> 55:38.200
But why is it there?
55:38.200 --> 55:42.200
You know, there didn't seem to be any of the features near it that seemed to be part of it.
55:42.200 --> 55:46.200
People would just say, oh, it's just a rock that happened to be there and cast that sort of shadow.
55:46.200 --> 55:47.200
I don't know.
55:47.200 --> 55:49.200
I don't know what to make of it, but it's unusual.
55:49.200 --> 55:55.200
Yeah, I mean, yeah, maybe it was, but the way that these images are processed,
55:55.200 --> 56:00.200
I think it's sometimes difficult to tell because there is less light out at Mars, a bit less light from the sun.
56:00.200 --> 56:03.200
So, you know, they have to overexpose them more.
56:03.200 --> 56:06.200
And now this was also featured prominently in the article,
56:06.200 --> 56:09.200
which you can see is a different object to the other one.
56:09.200 --> 56:13.200
It looks like a thicker slab or, well, maybe it is the same, but it's just a different angle.
56:13.200 --> 56:14.200
I don't know.
56:14.200 --> 56:16.200
Maybe it's just a different angle where the probe was.
56:16.200 --> 56:18.200
Maybe it is the same.
56:18.200 --> 56:20.200
I forget how large it is.
56:20.200 --> 56:27.200
I think it's something like, I think it's only like probably five meters, something like that.
56:27.200 --> 56:34.200
Well, probably would be, but I couldn't find the source of this image.
56:34.200 --> 56:36.200
This was prominent in the Daily Mail article.
56:36.200 --> 56:38.200
I could find the other one, but not this one.
56:38.200 --> 56:40.200
So if anybody can find that, send it to me.
56:40.200 --> 56:42.200
I couldn't find where this came from.
56:42.200 --> 56:43.200
I couldn't find it.
56:43.200 --> 56:46.200
The image reference wasn't given in the Daily Mail article.
56:46.200 --> 56:52.200
So now we're going to move out further out into the solar system and see what we come across there.
56:52.200 --> 56:55.200
I'm going to just take a stop by Saturn here.
56:55.200 --> 57:01.200
And between 1980 and 1996, the speed of rotation for Saturn's clouds at the equator
57:01.200 --> 57:07.200
reduced by 58.2 percent, and it was described as an unexpected and dramatic change in the weather.
57:07.200 --> 57:10.200
NASA explained this as seasonal changes.
57:10.200 --> 57:16.200
And then these spokes here that we see in the Voyager 1 images from 1981, Voyager 2 images, sorry,
57:16.200 --> 57:22.200
they had disappeared when the Cassini probe got there in 2003.
57:22.200 --> 57:29.200
But then we were shown this, which apparently was first imaged in 1980 or 1981 from Voyager,
57:29.200 --> 57:32.200
but it was never really publicly talked about.
57:32.200 --> 57:38.200
And then we were shown this image of the hexagon, a persistent hexagon in the,
57:38.200 --> 57:43.200
I forget if it's a north or south pole, but it's, Richard Hoagland and others will claim
57:43.200 --> 57:45.200
that this is an imprint of hyperdimensional energy.
57:45.200 --> 57:47.200
I don't know. I don't know what it is.
57:47.200 --> 57:52.200
Scientists now claim to have explained it as some form of standing wave in the currents
57:52.200 --> 57:55.200
within the storm systems there and the winds going round.
57:55.200 --> 57:59.200
Very unusual, though, where this hexagon has appeared.
57:59.200 --> 58:03.200
Some people think it ties in to sacred geometry and the Star of David and so on.
58:03.200 --> 58:07.200
And this is fairly recently, in fact, November 2012.
58:07.200 --> 58:12.200
You can see a high resolution, which means it's still there, still there, this hexagonal structure.
58:12.200 --> 58:15.200
So, I don't know, something going on with that.
58:15.200 --> 58:17.200
And then we have this huge storm as well.
58:17.200 --> 58:20.200
I mean, there seems to be changes going on throughout the solar system.
58:20.200 --> 58:21.200
All the planets are changing.
58:21.200 --> 58:25.200
I mention this because, you know, this idea of global warming and climate change
58:25.200 --> 58:28.200
is just all complete rubbish, you know.
58:28.200 --> 58:30.200
They just don't know what they're talking about,
58:30.200 --> 58:32.200
because all these climatologists, they're not astronomers,
58:32.200 --> 58:34.200
so they don't look at this sort of data.
58:34.200 --> 58:37.200
So they don't see these patterns happening across the planets.
58:37.200 --> 58:40.200
And for other reasons as well, of course, to do with 9-11,
58:40.200 --> 58:42.200
if you've heard me talk about that.
58:43.200 --> 58:46.200
Yeah, and then this is proof that they do airbrush images.
58:46.200 --> 58:48.200
They do airbrush images.
58:48.200 --> 58:52.200
And this was picked up in a story a couple of years ago now.
58:52.200 --> 58:53.200
I forgot the date there.
58:53.200 --> 58:56.200
I think it was 2009 or 2010.
58:56.200 --> 58:58.200
This was a Cassini image.
58:58.200 --> 59:01.200
And when somebody tweaked up the contrast to see what was,
59:01.200 --> 59:04.200
they claimed that they were hiding a spaceship in the NASA image,
59:04.200 --> 59:08.200
you know, in this, sorry, in this, I keep pressing the wrong buttons,
59:08.200 --> 59:09.200
in this area here.
59:11.200 --> 59:13.200
Emilia Lacawala is just a prick.
59:13.200 --> 59:18.200
I mean, she's worked for the Planetary Society.
59:18.200 --> 59:21.200
Yeah, and I'm a really frequent person at the Planetary Society.
59:21.200 --> 59:25.200
So when Arthur C. Clarke went public about the computer piglars,
59:25.200 --> 59:27.200
he said to the Planetary Society,
59:27.200 --> 59:29.200
fast in the big conference, because one of the,
59:29.200 --> 59:31.200
what do you think about Arthur C. Clarke?
59:31.200 --> 59:33.200
I always just send him an email about that.
59:33.200 --> 59:36.200
Like, don't mention him even though he's a board member.
59:36.200 --> 59:39.200
But the excuse they gave for airbrushing this is that
59:39.200 --> 59:41.200
they took a red, green and blue image,
59:41.200 --> 59:43.200
and in the time they took each of those frames,
59:43.200 --> 59:46.200
the Dione in the foreground had moved
59:46.200 --> 59:48.200
because the spacecraft was travelling so fast.
59:48.200 --> 59:54.200
And so they had to edit it to, you know, get it back to what they wanted.
59:54.200 --> 59:56.200
Ten minutes.
59:56.200 --> 59:57.200
Okay.
59:57.200 --> 01:00:00.200
Okay, so we're going to go to our apptus now.
01:00:00.200 --> 01:00:04.200
This is mostly from Richard Hogan's website, if not all of it,
01:00:04.200 --> 01:00:05.200
except for a little video I made,
01:00:05.200 --> 01:00:07.200
but I won't have time to play the video, I don't think.
01:00:07.200 --> 01:00:10.200
So it's about ten minutes, a video of Arthur C. Clarke.
01:00:13.200 --> 01:00:20.200
Iapetus was discovered in 1671 by Giovanni Domenico at Cassini,
01:00:20.200 --> 01:00:24.200
and he observed Iapetus over 740 million miles distant
01:00:24.200 --> 01:00:26.200
using a 17th century refracting telescope,
01:00:26.200 --> 01:00:29.200
whose main lens was only two inches in diameter,
01:00:29.200 --> 01:00:33.200
so vastly inferior to a pair of cheap eBay binoculars, I'm sure.
01:00:33.200 --> 01:00:36.200
He discovered it all those years ago,
01:00:36.200 --> 01:00:39.200
which is why it's unusual that Phobos was discovered much later,
01:00:39.200 --> 01:00:43.200
you know, let's see, 100 years later, over 100 years later.
01:00:43.200 --> 01:00:45.200
When Cassini discovered Iapetus,
01:00:45.200 --> 01:00:48.200
over a period of time, observed Iapetus,
01:00:48.200 --> 01:00:51.200
he was puzzled that every 40 days or so it seemed to disappear from view,
01:00:51.200 --> 01:00:54.200
then reappear 40 days later.
01:00:54.200 --> 01:00:58.200
And the orbit of Iapetus around Saturn is unusual.
01:00:58.200 --> 01:01:02.200
It's inclined to Saturn's orbit of about 15 degrees,
01:01:02.200 --> 01:01:04.200
and it's thought that the object Iapetus, in this case,
01:01:04.200 --> 01:01:08.200
did not form out of the same clouded material as the rest of the system,
01:01:08.200 --> 01:01:10.200
and so that's what they say.
01:01:12.200 --> 01:01:16.200
But then we got this close-up image in 1981 from Voyager 2,
01:01:16.200 --> 01:01:19.200
still not a lot of detail.
01:01:19.200 --> 01:01:22.200
Dark half is about ten times darker than the light half,
01:01:22.200 --> 01:01:24.200
but they couldn't explain this,
01:01:24.200 --> 01:01:27.200
and it was just a sort of cratered rocky surface.
01:01:28.200 --> 01:01:30.200
It was less spherical than it should be,
01:01:30.200 --> 01:01:33.200
though that's one thing they found in 1981.
01:01:33.200 --> 01:01:37.200
And then in July 2004, Cassini got close, we've got that image,
01:01:37.200 --> 01:01:40.200
and you can see the dark region very clearly here,
01:01:40.200 --> 01:01:45.200
and it actually looks like a giant eye when you look at it in the right orientation,
01:01:45.200 --> 01:01:49.200
and then we have this, December 31st, 2004.
01:01:49.200 --> 01:01:52.200
This image again, you can download this image,
01:01:52.200 --> 01:01:58.200
and we've got this equatorial wall, it's 800 miles long,
01:01:58.200 --> 01:02:03.200
looks like two halves of these little plastic balls that you use for your dog
01:02:03.200 --> 01:02:06.200
when they have a seam in the middle, it looks like that.
01:02:07.200 --> 01:02:11.200
And it's 12 miles wide, 800 miles long.
01:02:11.200 --> 01:02:13.200
This is on apatous.
01:02:13.200 --> 01:02:16.200
I've never seen a structure like this elsewhere in the solar system.
01:02:16.200 --> 01:02:19.200
No one talks about it. There it is, there's a close-up of it.
01:02:19.200 --> 01:02:23.200
Richard Hogan talked about it in 2004, just after they'd imaged it.
01:02:24.200 --> 01:02:30.200
Yeah, that's 24 miles long there, straight line, 24 miles.
01:02:32.200 --> 01:02:36.200
Hexagonal craters, and there are more hexagonal craters as well,
01:02:36.200 --> 01:02:39.200
or hexagonal-looking craters, these weird craters.
01:02:40.200 --> 01:02:44.200
No, there's no atmosphere, or might have a very tiny amount of an atmosphere,
01:02:44.200 --> 01:02:46.200
almost immeasurable.
01:02:46.200 --> 01:02:49.200
Again, these are Richard Hoagland's graphics that he's drawn up,
01:02:49.200 --> 01:02:51.200
he can download this from Enterprise Mission,
01:02:51.200 --> 01:02:54.200
and what intrigued me is that when Richard Hoagland talked about this
01:02:54.200 --> 01:02:58.200
at the Beyond Knowledge conference in 2009 here in Liverpool,
01:02:58.200 --> 01:03:01.200
he didn't show these images, even though from his own website,
01:03:01.200 --> 01:03:03.200
he did not show these images.
01:03:03.200 --> 01:03:07.200
He showed some zoomed-in portion around here and said there were buildings and structures.
01:03:07.200 --> 01:03:09.200
I couldn't see them.
01:03:11.200 --> 01:03:16.200
And again, there seems to be some type of structure here.
01:03:16.200 --> 01:03:19.200
Are we seeing plates of armour or construction plates of some kind?
01:03:19.200 --> 01:03:21.200
I don't know. I don't know.
01:03:23.200 --> 01:03:27.200
And then he also highlighted that you've got this angular aspect
01:03:27.200 --> 01:03:31.200
to this highly contrasted image here, if you see it.
01:03:32.200 --> 01:03:34.200
It's somewhat difficult to see, but I think it's there.
01:03:34.200 --> 01:03:36.200
I don't think that's an image processing artefact.
01:03:36.200 --> 01:03:39.200
It's not a mosaic image, as far as I'm aware, that one.
01:03:41.200 --> 01:03:43.200
Skip over that one.
01:03:43.200 --> 01:03:48.200
And then they later re-imaged the wall much closer,
01:03:48.200 --> 01:03:50.200
but again, they didn't really say anything about it.
01:03:50.200 --> 01:03:52.200
That was from 2008, I think, that image.
01:03:53.200 --> 01:03:55.200
Is it a geodesic dome of some kind?
01:03:55.200 --> 01:03:57.200
This is a book Minster Fuller with his geodesic dome.
01:03:57.200 --> 01:04:00.200
Is it a structure? I think it could be.
01:04:00.200 --> 01:04:03.200
And that was another Hoagland image.
01:04:03.200 --> 01:04:05.200
Pretty extraordinary.
01:04:05.200 --> 01:04:08.200
You know, did George Lucas know something?
01:04:09.200 --> 01:04:12.200
I know Joseph Farrell writes a bit about this as well,
01:04:12.200 --> 01:04:14.200
but again, I haven't really read his book.
01:04:14.200 --> 01:04:17.200
And I could tell you things about Joseph Farrell, but...
01:04:17.200 --> 01:04:19.200
So imagine standing on Titan.
01:04:19.200 --> 01:04:21.200
This is another thing that Hoagland proposed.
01:04:21.200 --> 01:04:27.200
And he wondered if it was a spiritual retreat for people,
01:04:27.200 --> 01:04:29.200
because I'll just see if I can play a little bit of this video.
01:04:29.200 --> 01:04:32.200
Maybe I can't, but I've got a little video where it shows you,
01:04:32.200 --> 01:04:34.200
if you get one of these desktop planetariums,
01:04:34.200 --> 01:04:36.200
such as Redshift or Starry Night,
01:04:36.200 --> 01:04:40.200
you can actually stand yourself on an apatous and look at Saturn
01:04:40.200 --> 01:04:43.200
and watch the view that you get and accelerate it in time.
01:04:43.200 --> 01:04:45.200
And you get a very...
01:04:45.200 --> 01:04:47.200
I've got this video on my YouTube channel, what I made.
01:04:47.200 --> 01:04:51.200
You get very much a changing picture of moons going at different angles
01:04:51.200 --> 01:04:54.200
and the rings opening and closing on Saturn.
01:04:54.200 --> 01:04:58.200
So an extraordinary sort of image that you would be presented with,
01:04:58.200 --> 01:05:00.200
much as if you were in the Himalayas, you know, in Tibet,
01:05:00.200 --> 01:05:03.200
and that's where you see these incredible vistas and landscape,
01:05:03.200 --> 01:05:05.200
and it inspires you spiritually.
01:05:05.200 --> 01:05:09.200
And I was quite intrigued by this idea that Hoagland was putting forward.
01:05:10.200 --> 01:05:13.200
I'm going to skip over this video because we're running out of time.
01:05:13.200 --> 01:05:16.200
Not too long before he died, a couple of years before he died,
01:05:16.200 --> 01:05:23.200
Arthur C. Clarke, he did an address when Iapetus flew past...
01:05:23.200 --> 01:05:27.200
sorry, Cassini flew past Iapetus in 2007.
01:05:27.200 --> 01:05:29.200
And I've got this video on my YouTube channel.
01:05:29.200 --> 01:05:31.200
Why was he doing this address?
01:05:31.200 --> 01:05:34.200
And he talked about the fact that in the novel 2001,
01:05:34.200 --> 01:05:40.200
this monolith was discovered at Iapetus, and they changed it in the film.
01:05:40.200 --> 01:05:43.200
The monolith in 2001, or not the one on the moon,
01:05:43.200 --> 01:05:47.200
there was one on the moon obviously, but there was another one discovered near to or orbiting Iapetus
01:05:47.200 --> 01:05:50.200
in the book 2001, A Space Odyssey.
01:05:50.200 --> 01:05:54.200
I believe Arthur C. Clarke knows some of this story, I think.
01:05:55.200 --> 01:05:57.200
But I haven't got time to play that.
01:05:57.200 --> 01:06:03.200
So I want to move on and finish off with some of the Soho image anomalies.
01:06:03.200 --> 01:06:09.200
I've got about four or five slides here.
01:06:09.200 --> 01:06:11.200
These are all on my website as well.
01:06:11.200 --> 01:06:14.200
And some of these were sent to me by...
01:06:14.200 --> 01:06:18.200
I'm not going to give his name because he didn't want his name revealed.
01:06:18.200 --> 01:06:25.200
He was in Germany and he sent them to me in 2007.
01:06:25.200 --> 01:06:27.200
So he sent them a good few years ago.
01:06:27.200 --> 01:06:29.200
Now, what is Soho?
01:06:29.200 --> 01:06:33.200
Soho is the solar and heliospheric observatory, as it says there.
01:06:33.200 --> 01:06:36.200
And it was launched, I think, in 1997 or 1998.
01:06:36.200 --> 01:06:42.200
And it's been imaging the sun in X-ray and other infrared emissions and so on,
01:06:42.200 --> 01:06:47.200
and all kinds of emissions, various radio emissions, and creating these images,
01:06:47.200 --> 01:06:55.200
since, well, I think about 13 odd years now, probably longer, 14 years, 15 years.
01:06:55.200 --> 01:07:00.200
And it's in one of the Lagrange points, L1.
01:07:00.200 --> 01:07:06.200
And what that means is the force of gravity on the probe between the Earth and the sun is equal,
01:07:06.200 --> 01:07:08.200
so it's in a stable orbit.
01:07:08.200 --> 01:07:10.200
It's about a million miles from the Earth.
01:07:10.200 --> 01:07:13.200
1.5 million kilometres, about a million miles.
01:07:13.200 --> 01:07:17.200
So this probe is hanging in space about a million miles from the Earth.
01:07:17.200 --> 01:07:19.200
It's not in geosynchronous orbit, anything like that.
01:07:19.200 --> 01:07:24.200
And it's constantly pointing at the sun, 24-7.
01:07:25.200 --> 01:07:33.200
Now, 2003, we had this story featured on the BBC website and in various newspapers and so on.
01:07:33.200 --> 01:07:35.200
Proof of Aliens goes on show.
01:07:35.200 --> 01:07:40.200
Featured in UFO magazine, the magazine that was done by Graham Birtzel,
01:07:40.200 --> 01:07:47.200
Mike Murray of this strange organisation called EuroCETI claimed to have captured these images.
01:07:47.200 --> 01:07:51.200
And then, you know, these got into the website and stuff.
01:07:51.200 --> 01:07:53.200
Mike Murray, a UFO enthusiast, is putting on a show,
01:07:53.200 --> 01:07:57.200
warn people not to contact the centre as it has been inundated with interest.
01:07:57.200 --> 01:08:01.200
These were shown at the Space Centre in Leicester, not too far from where I live now.
01:08:03.200 --> 01:08:11.200
But NASA have their own page about how to make your own UFO from these SOHO images.
01:08:11.200 --> 01:08:17.200
And I did a critique of this because if you read this explanation, it doesn't really hold water.
01:08:17.200 --> 01:08:23.200
And they say on their web page, data can be interpolated using one of a possible zillion methods.
01:08:23.200 --> 01:08:27.200
A zillion. Is that a scientific word on NASA's website?
01:08:27.200 --> 01:08:30.200
A zillion. Well, give us some methods. Tell us some methods.
01:08:30.200 --> 01:08:33.200
You know, edge enhancements, you know, Gaussian filters.
01:08:33.200 --> 01:08:35.200
What is the method? Tell us.
01:08:35.200 --> 01:08:38.200
And they claim to have recreated the image.
01:08:38.200 --> 01:08:40.200
That image is nothing like that.
01:08:42.200 --> 01:08:44.200
It's just ridiculous.
01:08:44.200 --> 01:08:46.200
But we'll go on and see what the image is actually.
01:08:46.200 --> 01:08:52.200
So what intrigued me is that Mr. Murray, this Murray guy,
01:08:52.200 --> 01:08:56.200
he claimed that their images were from two different satellites, not just SOHO.
01:08:56.200 --> 01:09:02.200
He said, we looked at the Lascaux satellite, which is pretty much the same orbit as SOHO,
01:09:02.200 --> 01:09:04.200
but it transmits in black and white.
01:09:04.200 --> 01:09:09.200
The images were in that one as well, the UFO images, the saucer images, whatever you want to call them.
01:09:09.200 --> 01:09:15.200
Actually, Lascaux is not a separate satellite, but one of the 12 instruments aboard SOHO.
01:09:15.200 --> 01:09:19.200
So what he said was clearly wrong. Murray was putting out disinformation.
01:09:19.200 --> 01:09:22.200
If he'd looked at these SOHO images and knew about them,
01:09:22.200 --> 01:09:26.200
he would know that the Lascaux camera is one of the cameras. It's not a separate probe.
01:09:26.200 --> 01:09:32.200
So putting out false facts like that allows him to be immediately ignored and discredited.
01:09:32.200 --> 01:09:35.200
But there are things in these images.
01:09:35.200 --> 01:09:38.200
I'm going to show you some SOHO comets now.
01:09:38.200 --> 01:09:42.200
These are what comets look like on a time-lapse movie of SOHO.
01:09:42.200 --> 01:09:45.200
So you can see what comets look like. There you go.
01:09:45.200 --> 01:09:48.200
Some of them go round the sun and come out the other side.
01:09:48.200 --> 01:09:51.200
Most of them crash into the sun and never to return.
01:09:51.200 --> 01:09:54.200
So that's what comets look like. There's that repeated, that sequence.
01:09:54.200 --> 01:09:58.200
2010, January the 3rd there.
01:09:58.200 --> 01:10:03.200
Here's another one, 2003, February. Slightly lower resolution image here.
01:10:03.200 --> 01:10:06.200
That's a big one. Not crashing into the sun.
01:10:06.200 --> 01:10:09.200
That's what comets look like.
01:10:09.200 --> 01:10:13.200
So, there we go. There's a comet.
01:10:15.200 --> 01:10:18.200
We'll go on. What the hell is this?
01:10:20.200 --> 01:10:23.200
This is from 2005.
01:10:26.200 --> 01:10:29.200
That's a NASA image. What the hell is it?
01:10:29.200 --> 01:10:33.200
Why are these beams coming out of that object, or coming out of the sun and going to the object,
01:10:33.200 --> 01:10:37.200
or coming out of the object and going to the sun? Can't tell.
01:10:37.200 --> 01:10:40.200
NASA claimed that that image is not valid because it hasn't got a date in it.
01:10:40.200 --> 01:10:44.200
Well, I'm sorry, it has. You can go and download it from their archive if you want.
01:10:47.200 --> 01:10:52.200
And this chap in Germany who sent me the... I made that slide, but he sent me these other ones.
01:10:52.200 --> 01:10:57.200
I think he found my website, so I posted this image and some commentary on it.
01:10:57.200 --> 01:11:05.200
And, you know, he was also trying to find out what was causing the effects in that image.
01:11:05.200 --> 01:11:08.200
Didn't get a straight answer, and then he found a load more.
01:11:08.200 --> 01:11:12.200
That's the page again with the debunking information. He critiques that.
01:11:12.200 --> 01:11:14.200
And there's a load more of these objects.
01:11:14.200 --> 01:11:18.200
He's done some image enhancement to bring out the edge enhancement and such,
01:11:18.200 --> 01:11:22.200
to bring out these... are these structured craft?
01:11:23.200 --> 01:11:28.200
Beams flying across. They're not comets. Beams coming out of objects.
01:11:28.200 --> 01:11:30.200
He's got... he sent me a whole... they're all on my website.
01:11:30.200 --> 01:11:34.200
He sent me about... oh, he's got about 200 of these images. Something like that.
01:11:34.200 --> 01:11:38.200
These are all from Seoul. These are NASA's images. Hundreds of them.
01:11:38.200 --> 01:11:40.200
I haven't got time to discuss all of them.
01:11:40.200 --> 01:11:44.200
But then you get these anomalies where it's like two images have been merged together.
01:11:44.200 --> 01:11:47.200
Are they trying to cover something up? I would say yes, they are.
01:11:50.200 --> 01:11:52.200
And more. There's loads of them.
01:11:52.200 --> 01:11:54.200
He's catalogue, and he's got all the dates and times,
01:11:54.200 --> 01:11:57.200
so you can go and look in the archive and find these if you wish to do that.
01:11:57.200 --> 01:12:02.200
What are these images? They're not planets. They're not comets. You know?
01:12:02.200 --> 01:12:07.200
You know? From different dates. Yeah, correct. Correct.
01:12:08.200 --> 01:12:10.200
What are they?
01:12:11.200 --> 01:12:15.200
Hundreds of them, as I say. I'm not going to talk through all of them. Loads of them.
01:12:18.200 --> 01:12:20.200
Hundreds.
01:12:21.200 --> 01:12:24.200
Now then, I'm going to move on to... and finish with this video,
01:12:24.200 --> 01:12:27.200
and I've got one slide after this video. A very short video.
01:12:27.200 --> 01:12:31.200
This was made by Peter Dunne from the helioscope.
01:12:31.200 --> 01:12:33.200
I forget the name of this website.
01:12:33.200 --> 01:12:37.200
There's basically a website where you can make your own time-lapse movies
01:12:37.200 --> 01:12:40.200
from the Soho Image Databank.
01:12:40.200 --> 01:12:45.200
Very easy to use. You put in the start date, the end date, click save,
01:12:45.200 --> 01:12:49.200
and I think it generates a time-lapse video which you can save onto your computer.
01:12:49.200 --> 01:12:53.200
Now, this video, as I say, was done by Peter Dunne.
01:12:53.200 --> 01:12:56.200
He discovered when making his time-lapse video
01:12:56.200 --> 01:13:00.200
that there was something in the video which wasn't moving.
01:13:00.200 --> 01:13:03.200
Wasn't moving. Everything else was moving.
01:13:03.200 --> 01:13:06.200
Because remember, this probe is flying around in orbit with the Earth,
01:13:06.200 --> 01:13:10.200
60,000 miles an hour, whatever this orbital speed of the Earth is.
01:13:10.200 --> 01:13:12.200
I can't remember.
01:13:12.200 --> 01:13:14.200
Let's try this video.
01:13:26.200 --> 01:13:28.200
Let's try this video.
01:13:56.200 --> 01:13:58.200
Let's try this video.
01:14:26.200 --> 01:14:28.200
Let's try this video.
01:14:56.200 --> 01:14:58.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:26.200 --> 01:15:28.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:28.200 --> 01:15:30.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:30.200 --> 01:15:32.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:32.200 --> 01:15:34.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:34.200 --> 01:15:36.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:36.200 --> 01:15:38.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:38.200 --> 01:15:40.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:40.200 --> 01:15:42.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:42.200 --> 01:15:44.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:44.200 --> 01:15:46.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:46.200 --> 01:15:48.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:48.200 --> 01:15:50.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:50.200 --> 01:15:52.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:52.200 --> 01:15:54.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:54.200 --> 01:15:56.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:56.200 --> 01:15:58.200
Let's try this video.
01:15:58.200 --> 01:16:00.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:00.200 --> 01:16:02.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:02.200 --> 01:16:04.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:04.200 --> 01:16:06.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:06.200 --> 01:16:08.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:08.200 --> 01:16:10.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:10.200 --> 01:16:12.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:12.200 --> 01:16:14.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:14.200 --> 01:16:16.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:16.200 --> 01:16:18.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:18.200 --> 01:16:20.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:20.200 --> 01:16:22.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:22.200 --> 01:16:24.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:24.200 --> 01:16:26.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:26.200 --> 01:16:28.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:28.200 --> 01:16:30.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:30.200 --> 01:16:32.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:32.200 --> 01:16:34.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:34.200 --> 01:16:36.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:36.200 --> 01:16:38.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:38.200 --> 01:16:40.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:40.200 --> 01:16:42.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:42.200 --> 01:16:44.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:44.200 --> 01:16:46.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:46.200 --> 01:16:48.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:48.200 --> 01:16:50.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:50.200 --> 01:16:52.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:52.200 --> 01:16:54.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:54.200 --> 01:16:56.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:56.200 --> 01:16:58.200
Let's try this video.
01:16:58.200 --> 01:17:00.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:00.200 --> 01:17:02.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:02.200 --> 01:17:04.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:04.200 --> 01:17:06.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:06.200 --> 01:17:08.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:08.200 --> 01:17:10.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:10.200 --> 01:17:12.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:12.200 --> 01:17:14.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:14.200 --> 01:17:16.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:16.200 --> 01:17:18.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:18.200 --> 01:17:20.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:20.200 --> 01:17:22.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:22.200 --> 01:17:24.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:24.200 --> 01:17:26.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:26.200 --> 01:17:28.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:28.200 --> 01:17:30.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:30.200 --> 01:17:32.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:32.200 --> 01:17:34.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:34.200 --> 01:17:36.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:36.200 --> 01:17:38.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:38.200 --> 01:17:40.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:40.200 --> 01:17:42.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:42.200 --> 01:17:44.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:44.200 --> 01:17:46.200
Let's try this video.
01:17:46.200 --> 01:17:48.200
The paradigm remains the same.
01:17:48.200 --> 01:17:51.200
Anybody who says, oh yeah, that's a space platform,
01:17:51.200 --> 01:17:53.200
ding, end of Korea.
01:17:53.200 --> 01:17:55.200
End of Korea.
01:17:55.200 --> 01:17:57.200
Or worse.
01:17:57.200 --> 01:17:59.200
You know the other options.
01:17:59.200 --> 01:18:01.200
So anyway,
01:18:01.200 --> 01:18:04.200
let me give you the whole Mars conspiracy in a nutshell.
01:18:04.200 --> 01:18:06.200
I didn't write this, it just perfectly,
01:18:06.200 --> 01:18:08.200
pretty much covers it.
01:18:08.200 --> 01:18:10.200
I have no doubt that there is some real mind blowing stuff
01:18:10.200 --> 01:18:13.200
going on on Mars, or Aptus, or Phobos, or whatever.
01:18:13.200 --> 01:18:15.200
And now governments know it, maybe not the governments,
01:18:15.200 --> 01:18:17.200
but the secret government.
01:18:17.200 --> 01:18:19.200
What they have to do is take the people's minds off Mars.
01:18:19.200 --> 01:18:21.200
They send these rovers up there,
01:18:21.200 --> 01:18:23.200
and they send back these pictures of basically nothing.
01:18:23.200 --> 01:18:27.200
The TV and internet are flooded with these pictures of nothing.
01:18:27.200 --> 01:18:30.200
Soon the people get tired of looking at pictures of nothing,
01:18:30.200 --> 01:18:33.200
and don't want to be bothered with Mars anymore.
01:18:33.200 --> 01:18:35.200
They trust that the government will make them aware
01:18:35.200 --> 01:18:37.200
of any important happenings on Mars,
01:18:37.200 --> 01:18:39.200
or Aptus, or Phobos, or whatever, should they occur.
01:18:39.200 --> 01:18:41.200
Of course, this will never happen.
01:18:41.200 --> 01:18:43.200
We the taxpayers paid for those rovers,
01:18:43.200 --> 01:18:45.200
we had a right to know when they were launched,
01:18:45.200 --> 01:18:47.200
how they landed, we have a right to see the pictures,
01:18:47.200 --> 01:18:49.200
so they give us a million pictures of nothing.
01:18:49.200 --> 01:18:51.200
Now we're so bored with the pictures
01:18:51.200 --> 01:18:53.200
that we really don't care anymore.
01:18:53.200 --> 01:18:55.200
They know we won't ask questions
01:18:55.200 --> 01:18:57.200
for fear of being bored out of our minds.
01:18:57.200 --> 01:18:59.200
And that's about how it works,
01:18:59.200 --> 01:19:01.200
because most people have no interest in this stuff.
01:19:01.200 --> 01:19:03.200
Oh yeah, rovers landed on Mars, oh that's nice.
01:19:03.200 --> 01:19:05.200
Or what time's Coronation Street on?
01:19:05.200 --> 01:19:07.200
So that is basically the secret government.
01:19:07.200 --> 01:19:09.200
And that's the secret government.
01:19:09.200 --> 01:19:11.200
And that's the secret government.
01:19:11.200 --> 01:19:13.200
So that is basically my presentation for you.
01:19:13.200 --> 01:19:15.200
There is more stuff I haven't had time to show.
01:19:15.200 --> 01:19:17.200
Those are the websites, I've got all this on my website.
01:19:17.200 --> 01:19:19.200
So I've got some cards and leaflets,
01:19:19.200 --> 01:19:21.200
and you know, I've got books,
01:19:21.200 --> 01:19:23.200
booklets, booklets, 50 pence.
01:19:23.200 --> 01:19:25.200
And I think I'm just about up to time now.
01:19:25.200 --> 01:19:27.200
I think, do we have some time for questions, Anthony?
01:19:27.200 --> 01:19:29.200
Okay, if anybody's got any questions,
01:19:29.200 --> 01:19:31.200
I'll try and answer them if I can.
01:19:31.200 --> 01:19:33.200
Conrad.
01:19:33.200 --> 01:19:35.200
Did he?
01:20:03.200 --> 01:20:05.200
I think you're not being able to see it.
01:20:05.200 --> 01:20:07.200
Yeah, I think that's a lot of it how it works.
01:20:07.200 --> 01:20:09.200
Any other questions?
01:20:09.200 --> 01:20:11.200
Just one other.
01:20:11.200 --> 01:20:13.200
Have you got a copy of the Hale Crater?
01:20:13.200 --> 01:20:15.200
The what?
01:20:15.200 --> 01:20:17.200
Hale Crater.
01:20:17.200 --> 01:20:19.200
H-A-L-E.
01:20:19.200 --> 01:20:21.200
Hale Crater, no, not on here, no.
01:20:21.200 --> 01:20:23.200
I don't know.
01:20:23.200 --> 01:20:25.200
Well, I haven't really looked at the Moon very much.
01:20:25.200 --> 01:20:29.200
I don't find the Moon stuff as compelling as the Mars stuff, to be honest.
01:20:29.200 --> 01:20:31.200
It's more like science.
01:20:31.200 --> 01:20:33.200
Oh, sorry.
01:20:33.200 --> 01:20:35.200
I'm very angry on this thing.
01:20:35.200 --> 01:20:37.200
Which one is that?
01:20:37.200 --> 01:20:41.200
It shows buildings, roads, agricultural fields.
01:20:41.200 --> 01:20:43.200
Oh, is that the one that was on Joe Skipper's site?
01:20:43.200 --> 01:20:45.200
Yeah, I'm not so sure about that.
01:20:45.200 --> 01:20:49.200
That site has now gone down, but it was a bit of a mixed bag.
01:20:49.200 --> 01:20:51.200
I think there's some good stuff on there.
01:20:51.200 --> 01:20:55.200
Some stuff was just compression artifacts and stuff.
01:20:55.200 --> 01:20:57.200
But that's the size of the building.
01:20:57.200 --> 01:20:59.200
Yeah, quite possibly.
01:20:59.200 --> 01:21:01.200
Any other questions?
01:21:01.200 --> 01:21:03.200
Any thoughts on the Russian probes, Mars?
01:21:03.200 --> 01:21:05.200
What I've heard?
01:21:05.200 --> 01:21:17.200
Well, as I say, there's been various stories about the probes being switched off prematurely, or failing prematurely, or the Phobos 2 story.
01:21:17.200 --> 01:21:19.200
What he said that it was hit by a missile, that I don't think is true.
01:21:19.200 --> 01:21:21.200
I've got that in the full presentation as to why.
01:21:21.200 --> 01:21:28.200
There's quite a good breakdown on the website where I've got the original pictures, the original final six pictures from that probe.
01:21:28.200 --> 01:21:31.200
And you can see what is alleged to be a missile is no such thing.
01:21:31.200 --> 01:21:33.200
It's a digital artifact on the picture.
01:21:33.200 --> 01:21:37.200
And you can see that clearly if you see the sequence of about six or eight pictures.
01:21:37.200 --> 01:21:41.200
But I don't know, so I haven't gone to the Russian probes that much.
01:21:58.200 --> 01:22:00.200
Thank you.